Magnetic resonance image-guided adaptive radiotherapy enables safe CTV-to-PTV margin reduction in prostate cancer: a cine MRI motion study.

Introduction: We aimed to establish if stereotactic body radiotherapy to the prostate can be delivered safely using reduced clinical target volume (CTV) to planning target volume (PTV) margins on the 1.5T MR-Linac (MRL) (Elekta, Stockholm, Sweden), in the absence of gating. Methods: Cine images taken in 3 orthogonal planes during the delivery of prostate SBRT with 36.25 Gray (Gy) in 5 fractions on the MRL were analysed. Using the data from 20 patients, the percentage of radiotherapy (RT) delivery time where the prostate position moved beyond 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 mm in the left-right (LR), superior-inferior (SI), anterior-posterior (AP) and any direction was calculated. Results: The prostate moved less than 3 mm in any direction for 90% of the monitoring period in 95% of patients. On a per-fraction basis, 93% of fractions displayed motion in all directions within 3 mm for 90% of the fraction delivery time. Recurring motion patterns were observed showing that the prostate moved with shallow drift (most common), transient excursions and persistent excursions during treatment. Conclusion: A 3 mm CTV-PTV margin is safe to use for the treatment of 5 fraction prostate SBRT on the MRL, without gating. In the context of gating this work suggests that treatment time will not be extensively lengthened when an appropriate gating window is applied.

Real-time motion-including dose estimation of simulated multi-leaf collimator-tracked magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Real-time dose estimation is a key-prerequisite to enable online intra-fraction treatment adaptation in magnetic resonance (MR)-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT). It is an essential component for the assessment of the dosimetric benefits and risks of online adaptive treatments, such as multi-leaf collimator (MLC)-tracking. PURPOSE: We present a proof-of-concept for a software workflow for real-time dose estimation of MR-guided adaptive radiotherapy based on real-time data-streams of the linac delivery parameters and target positions. METHODS: A software workflow, combining our in-house motion management software DynaTrack, a real-time dose calculation engine that connects to a research version of the treatment planning software (TPS) Monaco (v.6.09.00, Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden) was developed and evaluated. MR-guided treatment delivery on the Elekta Unity MR-linac was simulated with and without MLC-tracking for three prostate patients, previously treated on the Elekta Unity MR-linac (36.25 Gy/five fractions). Three motion scenarios were used: no motion, regular motion, and erratic prostate motion. Accumulated monitor units (MUs), centre of mass target position and MLC-leaf positions, were forwarded from DynaTrack at a rate of 25 Hz to a Monte Carlo (MC) based dose calculation engine which utilises the research GPUMCD-library (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden). A rigid isocentre shift derived from the selected motion scenarios was applied to a bulk density-assigned session MR-image. The respective electron density used for treatment planning was accessed through the research Monaco TPS. The software workflow including the online dose reconstruction was validated against offline dose reconstructions. Our investigation showed that MC-based real-time dose calculations that account for all linac states (including MUs, MLC positions and target position) were infeasible, hence states were randomly sampled and used for calculation as follows; Once a new linac state was received, a dose calculation with 106 photons was started. Linac states that arrived during the time of the ongoing calculation were put into a queue. After completion of the ongoing calculation, one new linac state was randomly picked from the queue and assigned the MU accumulated from the previous state until the last sample in the queue. The queue was emptied, and the process repeated throughout treatment simulation. RESULTS: On average 27% (23%-30%) of received samples were used in the real-time calculation, corresponding to a calculation time for one linac state of 148 ms. Median gamma pass rate (2%/3 mm local) was 100.0% (99.9%-100%) within the PTV volume and 99.1% (90.1%-99.4.0%) with a 15% dose cut off. Differences in PTVDmean , CTVDmean , RectumD2% , and BladderD2% (offline-online, % of prescribed dose) were below 0.64%. Beam-by-beam comparisons showed deviations below 0.07 Gy. Repeated simulations resulted in standard deviations below 0.31% and 0.12 Gy for the investigated volume and dose criteria respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Real-time dose estimation was successfully performed using the developed software workflow for different prostate motion traces with and without MLC-tracking. Negligible dosimetric differences were seen when comparing online and offline reconstructed dose, enabling online intra-fraction treatment decisions based on estimates of the delivered dose.

Feasibility of MR-guided ultrahypofractionated radiotherapy in 5, 2 or 1 fractions for prostate cancer.

The drive towards hypofractionated prostate radiotherapy is motivated by a low alpha/beta ratio for prostate cancer (1 to 3 Gy) compared to surrounding organs at risk, implying an improved therapeutic ratio with increasing dose per fraction. Early evidence from studies of ultrahypofractionated (UHF) prostate HDR brachytherapy has shown good tolerability in terms of normal tissue toxicities and clinical outcomes similar to conventional fractionation schedules. MR-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) with online plan adaptation and real-time tumour imaging may enable UHF doses to be delivered to the prostate safely, without the invasiveness of brachytherapy. The feasibility of UHF prostate treatment planning for the Unity MR-Linac (MRL, Elekta AB, Stockholm) was investigated for target prescriptions and planning constraints derived from the HDR brachytherapy and SBRT literature. Monaco 5.40 (Elekta) was used to generate MRL step-and-shoot IMRT plans for three dose fractionation protocols (5, 2 and 1 fractions), for ten randomly selected previously treated prostate cancer patients. Of the ten plans per UHF scheme, all clinical goals were met in all cases for 5 fractions, and in six cases for both 2 and 1 fraction schemes. PTV D95% was compromised by up to 6.4% and 3.9% of the associated target dose for 2 and 1 fraction plans respectively. There were two cases of PTV D95% compromise greater than a 5% dose decrease for the 2 fraction plans. The study suggests feasibility of the UHF treatment planning approaches if combined with real-time motion mitigation strategies.

Daily adaptive radiotherapy for patients with prostate cancer using a high field MR-linac: Initial clinical experiences and assessment of delivered doses compared to a C-arm linac.

INTRODUCTION: MR-guided adapted radiotherapy (MRgART) using a high field MR-linac has recently become available. We report the estimated delivered fractional dose of the first five prostate cancer patients treated at our centre using MRgART and compare this to C-Arm linac daily Image Guided Radiotherapy (IGRT). METHODS: Patients were treated using adapted treatment plans shaped to their daily anatomy. The treatments were recalculated on an MR image acquired immediately prior to treatment delivery in order to estimate the delivered fractional dose. C-arm linac non-adapted VMAT treatment plans were recalculated on the same MR images to estimate the fractional dose that would have been delivered using conventional radiotherapy techniques using a daily IGRT protocol. RESULTS: 95% and 93% of mandatory target coverage objectives and organ at risk dose constraints were achieved by MRgART and C-arm linac delivered dose estimates, respectively. Both delivery techniques were estimated to have achieved 98% of mandatory Organ At Risk (OAR) dose constraints whereas for the target clinical goals, 86% and 80% were achieved by MRgART and C-arm linac delivered dose estimates. CONCLUSIONS: Prostate MRgART can be delivered using the a high field MR-linac. Radiotherapy performed on a C-arm linac offers a good solution for prostate cancer patients who present with favourable anatomy at the time of reference imaging and demonstrate stable anatomy throughout the course of their treatment. For patients with critical OARs abutting target volumes on their reference image we have demonstrated the potential for a target dose coverage improvement for MRgART compared to C-arm linac treatment.