Vibration improves gait biomechanics linked to posttraumatic knee osteoarthritis following anterior cruciate ligament injury.

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) incurs a high risk of posttraumatic knee osteoarthritis (PTOA). Aberrant gait biomechanics contribute to PTOA and are attributable in part to quadriceps dysfunction. Vibration improves quadriceps function following ACLR, but its effects on gait biomechanics are unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of whole-body vibration (WBV) and local muscle vibration (LMV) on gait biomechanics in individuals with ACLR. Seventy-five volunteers (time since ACLR 27 ± 16 months) were randomized to WBV, LMV, or Control interventions. Walking biomechanics were assessed prior to and following a single exposure to the interventions. Outcomes included pre-post change scores in the ACLR limb for the peak vertical ground reaction force (vGRF) and its loading rate, peak internal knee extension (KEM) and abduction moments, and peak knee flexion and varus angles. LMV produced a significant decrease in the vGRF loading rate (-3.6 BW/s) that was greater than the changes in the WBV (-0.3 BW/s) and Control (0.5 BW/s) groups. Additionally, WBV produced an increase in the peak KEM (0.27% BW × Ht) that was greater than the change in the Control group (-0.17% BW × Ht) but not the LMV group (0.01% BW × Ht). Lower KEM and greater loading rates have been linked to declines in joint health following ACLR. WBV acutely increased the peak KEM and LMV decreased loading rates. These data suggest that vibration has the potential to mitigate aberrant gait biomechanics, and may represent an effective approach for reducing PTOA risk following ACLR.

Associations Among Eccentric Hamstrings Strength, Hamstrings Stiffness, and Jump-Landing Biomechanics.

CONTEXT: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury risk can be assessed from landing biomechanics. Greater hamstrings stiffness is associated with a landing-biomechanics profile consistent with less ACL loading but is difficult to assess in the clinical setting. Eccentric hamstrings strength can be easily evaluated by clinicians and may provide a surrogate measure for hamstrings stiffness. OBJECTIVE: To examine associations among eccentric hamstrings strength, hamstrings stiffness, and landing biomechanics linked to ACL injury risk. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Research laboratory. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: A total of 34 uninjured, physically active participants (22 women, 12 men; age = 20.2 ± 1.6 years, height = 171.5 ± 9.7 cm, mass = 67.1 ± 12.7 kg). INTERVENTION(S): We collected eccentric hamstrings strength, active hamstrings stiffness, and double- and single-legged landing biomechanics during a single session. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Bivariate associations were conducted between eccentric hamstrings strength and hamstrings stiffness, vertical ground reaction force, internal knee-extension moment, internal knee-varus moment, anterior tibial shear force, knee sagittal-plane angle at initial ground contact, peak knee-flexion angle, knee frontal-plane angle at initial ground contact, peak knee-valgus angle, and knee-flexion displacement using Pearson product moment correlations or Spearman rank-order correlations. RESULTS: We observed no association between hamstrings stiffness and eccentric hamstrings strength (r = 0.029, P = .44). We also found no association between hamstrings stiffness and landing biomechanics. However, greater peak eccentric strength was associated with less vertical ground reaction force in both the double-legged (r = -0.331, P = .03) and single-legged (r = -0.418, P = .01) landing conditions and with less internal knee-varus moment in the single-legged landing condition (r = -0.326, P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: Eccentric hamstrings strength was associated with less vertical ground reaction force during both landing tasks and less internal knee-varus moment during the single-legged landing but was not an acceptable clinical estimate of active hamstrings stiffness.

Somatosensory Function Influences Aberrant Gait Biomechanics Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Osteoarthritis is common following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ALCR), and aberrant gait biomechanics are considered a primary contributor. Somatosensory dysfunction potentially alters gait biomechanics, but this association is unclear. Therefore, the purposes of this investigation were to compare somatosensory function between limbs and evaluate associations between somatosensory function and gait biomechanics linked to osteoarthritis development in individuals with ALCR. Seventy-three volunteers with ALCR participated. Gait biomechanics (peak vertical ground reaction force magnitude and loading rate, peak internal knee extension and valgus moments, peak knee flexion and varus angles, and quadriceps/hamstrings co-activation) were assessed as subjects walked at their preferred speed. The somatosensory function was assessed via joint position sense error (knee flexion) and vibratory perception threshold (femoral epicondyles, malleoli, and first metatarsal). Though somatosensory function did not differ between the ACLR and contralateral limbs, poorer joint position sense in the ACLR limb was associated with lower loading rates and internal knee extension moments, and greater co-activation. Poorer vibratory perception at the medial and lateral malleoli and first metatarsal head in the ACLR limb was associated with lower loading rates, greater internal knee valgus moments and varus angles, and greater co-activation. Poorer vibratory perception at the medial malleolus and first metatarsal head in the contralateral limb was associated with greater peak knee varus angles and internal knee valgus moments. These results suggest that future research evaluating rehabilitation approaches for improving somatosensory function is warranted as a potential approach for restoring normal gait biomechanics and reducing osteoarthritis risk. © 2019 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 38:620-628, 2020.

Co-activation during gait following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Heightened co-activation of the quadriceps and hamstrings has been reported following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction during various tasks, and may contribute to post-traumatic osteoarthritis risk. However, it is unclear if this phenomenon occurs during walking or how co-activation influences gait biomechanics linked to changes in joint health. METHODS: Co-activation and gait biomechanics were assessed in 50 individuals with ACLR and 25 healthy controls. Biomechanical outcomes included knee flexion displacement, peak vertical ground reaction force magnitude and rate, peak internal knee extension and valgus moments and rates, sagittal knee stiffness, and the heelstrike transient. Co-activation was calculated for the flexors and extensors collectively (i.e. composite), the medial musculature, and the lateral musculature. FINDINGS: Composite co-activation was greater in the ACLR limb compared to the contralateral limb and the control cohort during the preparatory and heelstrike phases of gait, and co-activation of the medial musculature was greater in the ACLR limb compared to the control cohort during the heelstrike phase. Greater co-activation in multiple gait phases was associated with less knee flexion displacement (r = -0.293 to -0.377), smaller peak vertical ground reaction force magnitude (r = -0.291), smaller peak internal knee extension moment (r = -0.291 to -0.328), and greater peak internal knee valgus moment (r = 0.317). INTERPRETATION: Individuals with ACLR displayed heightened co-activation during walking which was associated with biomechanical outcomes that have been linked to negative changes in joint health following ACLR. These data suggest that excessive co-activation may contribute to the mechanical pathogenesis of post-traumatic osteoarthritis. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02605876.

Medial Unloader Braces and Lateral Heel Wedges Do not Alter Gait Biomechanics in Healthy Young Adults.

Context: Orthotic devices such as medial unloader knee braces and lateral heel wedges may limit cartilage loading following trauma or surgical repair. However, little is known regarding their effects on gait biomechanics in young, healthy individuals who are at risk of cartilage injury during physical activity due to greater athletic exposure compared with older adults. Objective: Determine the effect of medial unloader braces and lateral heel wedges on lower-extremity kinematics and kinetics in healthy, young adults. Design: Cross-sectional crossover design. Setting: Laboratory setting. Patients: Healthy, young adults who were recreationally active (30 min/d for 3 d/wk) between 18 and 35 years of age, who were free from orthopedic injury for at least 6 months, and with no history of lower-extremity orthopedic surgery. Interventions: All subjects completed normal over ground walking with a medial unloader brace at 2 different tension settings and a lateral heel wedge for a total of 4 separate walking conditions. Main Outcome Measures: Frontal plane knee angle at heel strike, peak varus angle, peak internal knee valgus moment, and frontal plane angular impulse were compared across conditions. Results: The medial unloader brace at 50% (-2.04° [3.53°]) and 100% (-1.80° [3.63°]) maximum load placed the knee in a significantly more valgus orientation at heel strike compared with the lateral heel wedge condition (-0.05° [2.85°]). However, this difference has minimal clinical relevance. Neither of the orthotic devices altered knee kinematics or kinetics relative to the control condition. Conclusions: Although effective in older adults and individuals with varus knee alignment, medial unloader braces and lateral heel wedges do not influence gait biomechanics in young, healthy individuals.

Gait biomechanics in individuals with patellar tendon and hamstring tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction grafts.

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) restores joint stability following ACL injury but does not attenuate the heightened risk of developing knee osteoarthritis. Additionally, patellar tendon (PT) grafts incur a greater risk of osteoarthritis compared to hamstring grafts (HT). Aberrant gait biomechanics, including greater loading rates (i.e. impulsive loading), are linked to the development of knee osteoarthritis. However, the role of graft selection on walking gait biomechanics linked to osteoarthritis is poorly understood, thus the purpose of this study was to compare walking gait biomechanics between individuals with HT and PT grafts. Ninety-eight (74 PT; 24 HT) subjects with a history of ACLR performed walking gait at a self-selected speed from which the peak vertical ground reaction force (vGRF) during the first 50% of the stance phase and its instantaneous loading rate, peak internal knee extension and valgus moments, and peak knee flexion and varus angles were obtained. When controlling for time since ACLR and quadriceps strength, there were no differences in any kinetic or kinematic variables between graft types. While not significant, 44% of the PT cohort were identified as impulsive loaders (displaying a heelstrike transient in the majority of walking trials) compared to only 25% of the HT cohort (odds ratio = 2.3). This more frequent observation of impulsive loading may contribute to the greater risk of osteoarthritis with PT grafts. Future research is necessary to determine if impulsive loading and small magnitude differences between graft types contribute to osteoarthritis risk when extrapolated over thousands of steps per day.

Clinical Predictors of Dynamic Lower Extremity Stiffness During Running.

BACKGROUND: Lower extremity stiffness describes the relative loading and kinematics of the entire lower extremity during ground contact. Previously injured subjects demonstrate altered lower extremity stiffness values. Clinical analysis of lower extremity stiffness is not currently feasible due to increased time and cost. OBJECTIVE: To determine the clinically identifiable contributors to lower extremity stiffness. METHODS: In this cross-sectional controlled laboratory study, 92 healthy runners completed a clinical screening involving passive assessment of hip, knee, and ankle range of motion, along with body anthropometrics. The range of motion was predominantly assessed in the sagittal and frontal planes. In the same session, runners completed an overground kinematic and kinetic running assessment at 3.35 m/s (±5%) to obtain lower extremity stiffness. Correlations between lower extremity stiffness and clinical variables were completed. Modifiable variables were included in an all-possible-linear regressions approach to determine a parsimonious model for predicting lower extremity stiffness. RESULTS: Clinically modifiable measures included in the regression model accounted for 48.4% of the variance of lower extremity stiffness during running. The variables that predicted greater stiffness included greater body mass, less ankle dorsiflexion range of motion with the knee flexed, less hip internal rotation range of motion, and less first-ray mobility. CONCLUSION: Reduced lower extremity range of motion and greater body mass are associated with greater lower extremity stiffness during running. These variables could be addressed clinically to potentially alter lower extremity stiffness and injury risk. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2019;49(2):98-104. Epub 27 Jul 2018. doi:10.2519/jospt.2019.7683.