Does phase 2 of the expiratory PCO2 versus volume curve have diagnostic value in emphysema patients?

It has been postulated that serial inhomogeneity of ventilation in the peripheral airways in emphysema is represented by the shape of expiratory carbon dioxide tension versus volume curve. We examined the diagnostic value of this test in patients with various degrees of emphysema. The volumes between 25-50% (V25-50) and 25-75% (V25-75) of the expiratory carbon dioxide tension versus volume curve were determined in 29 emphysematous patients (20 severely obstructed and 9 moderately obstructed), 12 asthma patients in exacerbation of symptoms, and 28 healthy controls. Discriminant analysis was used to examine whether these diagnostic groups could be separated. With regard to phase 2 of the expiratory CO2 versus volume curve (mixture of anatomic deadspace and alveolar air), a plot of intercept versus slope of the relationships of (V25-50) and (V25-75) versus inspiratory volume (VI) from functional residual capacity (FRC), obtained during natural breathing frequency, proved to be most discriminating in the separation between healthy controls and severely obstructed emphysema patients. Separating healthy controls and severely obstructed emphysema patients on the basis of the discriminant line for V25-50, 9 of the 12 asthma patients in exacerbation were classified as normal, and only 5 of the 9 moderately obstructed emphysema patients as emphysematous. For V25-75 involvement of phase 3 of the curve (alveolar plateau) in asthma patients in exacerbation caused a marked overlap with the severely obstructed emphysema patients. In the healthy controls, a fixed breathing frequency of 20 breaths.min-1 led to an increase of both volumes.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

A quasi steady state ramp method for the estimation of the ventilatory response to CO2.

There are two suitable methods for estimating the ventilatory response to CO2: the steady state or the Read method. The latter is usually applied because of its shorter duration and its stimulus, near to tissue PCO2. From recent studies on a physiological model but also on the dynamics of the ventilatory CO2 response (G liters min-1 kPa-1), it can be shown, both theoretically and experimentally, that the Read method markedly overestimates the steady-state estimate of the ventilatory CO2 response (Gss). We have, therefore, applied two ramp approaches: one with an initial end-tidal PCO2 (PetCO2) step of 0.5 kPa and a mean PetCO2 ramp slope of 0.41 kPa/min (step-ramp method, SR) and one without an initial step and a mean ramp slope of 0.21 kPa/min (ramp method; R). As predicted by theory, the ventilatory CO2 response from the R method (GR) during the second 4-min interval of the 8-min procedure and the ventilatory CO2 response from the SR method (GSR) from the whole 6-min procedure, except for the first 30 s, should yield a good approximation of Gss. In a group of 12 normal volunteers we indeed found no differences between these estimates, and, as predicted by theory, we found both estimates to be larger than GR from the first 4-min interval. From the interindividual spread, only the difference with respect to GSR was significant (p less than 0.02). The volunteers preferred the R approach because of the lower PetCO2 attained and the smaller ventilation increase.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)