Flanker performance in female college students with ADHD: a diffusion model analysis.

Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is characterized by poor adaptation to environmental demands, which leads to various everyday life problems. The present study had four aims: (1) to compare performance in a flanker task in female college students with and without ADHD (N = 39) in a classical analyses of reaction time and error rate and studying the underlying processes using a diffusion model, (2) to compare the amount of focused attention, (3) to explore the adaptation of focused attention, and (4) to relate adaptation to psychological functioning. The study followed a 2-between (group: ADHD vs. control) × 2-within (flanker conflict: incongruent vs. congruent) × 2-within (conflict frequency: 20 vs. 80 %) design. Compared to a control group, the ADHD group displayed prolonged response times accompanied by fewer errors in a flanker task. Results from the diffusion model analyses revealed that the members of the ADHD group showed deficits in non-decisional processes (i.e., higher non-decision time) and leaned more toward accuracy than participants without ADHD (i.e., setting higher boundaries). The ADHD group showed a more focused attention and less adaptation to the task conditions which is related to psychological functioning. Deficient non-decisional processes and poor adaptation are in line with theories of ADHD and presumably typical for the ADHD population, although this has not been shown using a diffusion model. However, we assume that the cautious strategy of trading speed of for accuracy is specific to the subgroup of female college students with ADHD and might be interpreted as a compensation mechanism.

Carotid artery stenting, what can be learned after more than 1,000 patients: a single centre single operator experience.

AIMS: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the outcome of carotid artery stenting (CAS) in a single, high-volume centre of a single operator and to analyse the circumstances under which complications occur. Recent trials comparing CAS with carotid endarterectomy demonstrated controversial results. The low experience of interventionists in performing CAS was a major limitation of these studies. The number of procedures needed to achieve optimal skills is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: From May 1997 until April 2010, 1,004 patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis underwent CAS by a single operator. A cerebral protection device was in mandatory use since 2000. In-hospital complication rates were defined as the cumulative rate of death, myocardial infarction or stroke. Procedural success was achieved in 97.77% of patients. The perioperative complication rate was 1.69% including 0.2% deaths, 1.1% patients with minor stroke, 0.4% patients with major stroke. In 88% (15 out of 17) of the patients with complications, unfavourable anatomical or procedural factors could be identified. After the first 100 CAS performed,the complication rate was at 3% and significantly decreased to 1% after more than 500 procedures. Patients ≥80 years had a significantly higher complication rate. CONCLUSIONS: In a high-volume experienced centre, the in-hospital complication rate is low. Complications occurred almost exclusively in patients with unfavourable anatomical or procedural characteristics and seem to be avoidable in most patients. A learning curve was observed up to 500 procedures. Elderly patients have a higher complication rate.

Multitasking in adults with ADHD.

Adults with ADHD have problems in everyday multitasking situations presumably because of deficits in executive functions. The present study aims to find out (a) whether adults with ADHD show deficient multitasking performance in a standardized task, (b) how they perceive the multitasking situation, and (c) which task structure might be beneficial for them as compared with adults without ADHD. Therefore, we experimentally compared task performance, mood, and motivation in a group of 45 men with ADHD (M-age = 34.47, SD = 9.95) with a comparison group of 42 men without ADHD (M-age = 31.12, SD = 10.59) in three conditions: (a) a multitasking paradigm, (b) an interleaving condition in which tasks had to be performed without planning or monitoring, and (c) a non-interleaving condition. Our results showed no impaired multitasking performance in adults with ADHD. However, they showed better mood and more motivation in the non-interleaving condition.