Does a nurse-led mental health liaison service for older people reduce psychiatric morbidity in acute general medical wards? A randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the clinical effectiveness of a nurse-led mental health liaison service in managing mental health problems in older physically ill inpatients. DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Four general medical wards in a district general hospital in a northern UK town. PARTICIPANTS: 153 medically ill older people (aged 65 or over) who scored above the threshold for depression and/or cognitive impairment on a brief screening instrument (4-item geriatric depression scale and 6-item orientation-memory-concentration test): 77 were randomised to a nurse-led intervention and 76 to usual care. Included in the analysis were 120 participants who completed 6-8 week follow-up assessments. INTERVENTION: Multi-faceted intervention led by a mental health liaison nurse. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Scores on the Health of the Nation Outcome Scale 65+, the geriatric depression scale, and the Standardised Mini-Mental State Examination. RESULTS: No significant differences were found between groups on the total Health of the Nation Outcome Scale 65+ scores (11.5 versus 11.5, adjusted mean difference -0.04, 95% CI-1.4 to 1.3, P = 0.96) nor on the Standardised Mini-Mental State Examination (20.3 versus 21.8, adjusted mean difference -0.4, 95% CI-2.1 to 1.3, P = 0.63). Subjects randomised to the intervention arm had significantly lower Geriatric Depression Scale scores at 6-8 week follow-up than those receiving usual care (12.2 versus 14.0, adjusted mean difference -2.0, 95% CI-4.0 to -0.1, P = 0.043). CONCLUSIONS: Nurse-led mental health liaison services which accept all screened cases from acute medical wards are unlikely to be effective in reducing general psychiatric morbidity. Services which focus on the prevention of delirium and target particular patient groups or disorders such as depression are more likely to be effective.

Validation of short screening tests for depression and cognitive impairment in older medically ill inpatients.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the criterion validity of the four-item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS4) and the six-item Orientation-Memory-Concentration-test (OMC) against longer widely used screening instruments. METHOD: Participants were 153 patients (aged 65 or over) admitted to four acute medical wards of a northern UK town. The validity of the GDS4 was determined using the 30-item geriatric depression scale (GDS30) as the comparator; the validity of the OMC was determined using the standardised mini-mental state examination (MMSE) as the comparator. For both screens, the area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was calculated in addition to the number of true and false positives and the sensitivity and specificity for various cut-off points. RESULTS: The area under ROC curve was 0.80 for the GDS4 and 0.90 for the OMC. Using a cut-off of 0/1, the GDS4 correctly classified 78.2% of participants, using the GDS30 as the standard. This cut-off gave a sensitivity of 90.1% and specificity of 55.3%. With a cut-off of 1/2 the GDS4 correctly classified 76.8% of participants and had sensitivity and specificity of 78% and 74.5% respectively. The GDS4 and GDS30 were highly correlated (rho=0.63, p < 0.0005). A cut-off of 10/11 on the OMC gave optimum performance. With this cut-off, it correctly classified 85.9% of participants, and had 85.6% sensitivity and 86.8% specificity. There was a significant correlation between the OMC and the SMMSE (rho = -0.827, p < 0.0005). CONCLUSION: The GDS4 and OMC appear to be useful instruments for screening for depression and cognitive impairment among older medical inpatients.