Beneficial effect of a bile acid resin binder on enteral feeding induced diarrhea.

OBJECTIVES: Diarrhea is a complication of enteral feeding, occurring in up to 68% of critically ill patients. We hypothesized that prolonged fasting results in abnormal bile acid homeostasis. Subsequent enteral feeding then causes a relative luminal excess of bile acids, which leads to choleretic diarrhea. Hence, diarrhea induced by enteral feeding should improve with the use of a bile acid binding agent, such as Colestid Granules. METHODS: We evaluated the effect of Colestid on enteral feeding-induced diarrhea in a double-blind placebo-controlled study. Nineteen patients who were nil per os (NPO) for 5 days before initiation of enteral feeding were enrolled in the study and treatment continued for 7 days. The severity and frequency of diarrhea were quantified. Fecal bile acids were measured enzymatically. Stool nutrient loss was measured by fat extraction, microkjeldahl determination of nitrogen, and bomb calorimetry of dried fecal specimens. RESULTS: Enteral feeding resulted in a high frequency of diarrhea (95%) at some time during the observation period. The majority of episodes of diarrhea in both groups were of low volume. Colestid significantly decreased the prevalence and severity of diarrhea. Colestid had no significant effect on fecal calorie or nutrient losses. The average bile acid concentration in the stool increased significantly after enteral feeding. CONCLUSION: Enteral feeding-induced diarrhea is, at least in part, due to malabsorption of bile acids. The bile acid resin binding agent Colestid improves diarrhea induced by enteral feeding.

Enhanced low-density lipoprotein cholesterol reduction and cost-effectiveness by low-dose colestipol plus lovastatin combination therapy.

A total of 96 patients with moderate elevations of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol were randomly assigned to 4 different double-blind treatment regimens: placebo; colestipol 5 g and lovastatin 20 mg/day (C5 + L20); colestipol 10 g and lovastatin 20 mg/day (C10 + L20); and lovastatin 40 mg/day (L40). During 12 weeks of therapy, C10 + L20 achieved the greatest reduction in total cholesterol (-32%) and LDL cholesterol (-48%) levels from baseline. This combination also exhibited significantly greater reductions in LDL cholesterol levels than the C5 + L20 and L40 groups (p < 0.01). The differences in total and LDL cholesterol reduction between the C5 + L20 and L40 groups were not significant. Similar changes and differences between treatments were seen in apolipoprotein B levels. Whereas mean total apolipoprotein A-I levels increased with all treatments (p < 0.05), lipoprotein particles A-I were significantly increased in the C10 + L20 group (p < 0.01) only. Results demonstrate that the combination of low-dose lovastatin (20 mg/day) with low-dose colestipol (5 or 10 g/day) produces LDL cholesterol reductions equal to or greater than higher doses of lovastatin (40 mg/day). In addition, low-dose combinations are > 25% more cost-effective than high-dose monotherapy.

Blind comparison of patient preference for Flavored Colestid Granules and Questran Light.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the sensory and mixability characteristics of Flavored Colestid Granules (a new colestipol formulation) with Questran Light (the most recent cholestyramine formulation). METHODOLOGY: Seventy-two nonsmoking adults between the ages of 25 and 64 years were enrolled in the study. Subjects assessed the sensory and mixability characteristics of each product in chilled bottled water and orange juice after at least a one-hour fast. Products were administered in a double-blind, randomized fashion. The sensory characteristics that were rated included overall rating, aftertaste, appearance, aroma, color, consistency, flavor, sweetness, mouthfeel, and thickness. Each characteristic was rated with a nine-point hedonic scale. Mixability of the products was assessed on a five-point scale. Subjects also were asked to choose which product they preferred as to sensory and mixability characteristics in each vehicle. RESULTS: Fifty-three of the 72 subjects preferred the sensory characteristics of Flavored Colestid Granules in water (p < 0.001). Questran Light was preferred by 61 subjects when mixed in orange juice (p < 0.001). The sensory characteristic rating scores also supported subject preferences for Flavored Colestid Granules in water and Questran Light in orange juice. Mixability of Flavored Colestid Granules was rated significantly better (p < 0.001) than Questran Light in water. There was no significant difference for mixability between the products in orange juice. CONCLUSIONS: Questran Light was significantly preferred on a sensory basis when mixed in orange juice. Flavored Colestid Granules was significantly preferred over Questran Light for both sensory and mixability characteristics with water as the vehicle.

Effect of ibuprofen in patients with severe sepsis: a randomized, double-blind, multicenter study. The Ibuprofen Study Group.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and physiologic actions of ibuprofen in patients with severe sepsis. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: Three university hospital medical ICUs. PATIENTS: Twenty-nine patients with clinical evidence of sepsis and the need for hemodynamic monitoring with a pulmonary artery flotation catheter. INTERVENTIONS: Thirteen patients received placebo and 16 received ibuprofen that consisted of 600 mg (n = 11) or 800 mg (n = 5) iv over 20 mins, followed by three 800-mg doses administered as a rectal solution every 6 hrs. The initial iv dose was given within 4 hrs of the presumptive diagnosis of sepsis. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The peak circulating total ibuprofen concentration after the iv dose (49.4 +/- 4.5 micrograms/mL, mean +/- SEM) was higher than peak concentrations after the three rectal doses (17.0 +/- 2.7, 16.4 +/- 3.0, 16.0 +/- 3.1 micrograms/mL). Both routes of ibuprofen administration were well tolerated. Frequent monitoring for gastrointestinal bleeding and assessment of renal and hepatic function failed to demonstrate significant differences between ibuprofen and placebo. Because a trend for reduced creatinine clearance was observed at 8 hrs in the ibuprofen group, nephrotoxicity of this drug in sepsis cannot be excluded. Temperature decreased significantly within 4 hrs of the initial dose of investigational therapy in patients who received ibuprofen (38.5 +/- 0.3 degrees to 37.0 +/- 0.2 degrees C, p less than .001). However, despite this significant change in temperature, we were unable to detect significant differences in hemodynamic and respiratory values or survival when ibuprofen-treated patients were compared with controls. CONCLUSIONS: Ibuprofen was well tolerated when administered iv and rectally to patients with severe sepsis, although drug absorption was poor with the rectal route. Significant antipyretic effects of ibuprofen were demonstrated. Although an excellent safety profile characterized ibuprofen in this study, the absence of ibuprofen-associated toxicity may have been secondary to poor rectal absorption of the drug. Our results support the continued clinical investigation of ibuprofen in sepsis, using an all-intravenous route of administration.

Pharmacokinetics of the R(-) and S(+) enantiomers of ibuprofen in the serum and synovial fluid of arthritis patients.

Eight patients with arthritis and knee effusions received 13 doses of a single 800-mg ibuprofen tablet every 8 hours. Serum and synovial fluid samples were obtained after the first and last doses and assayed for the R(-) and S(+) enantiomers of ibuprofen by a stereospecific assay. Since only S(+)-ibuprofen inhibits cyclo-oxygenase, a description of the time course of this isomer in synovial fluid is needed for the development of suitable pharmacodynamic models. The isomers were significantly different with respect to peak concentrations and areas under the concentration-time curves (AUC) in synovial fluid levels. No significant accumulation of either isomer was observed in serum or synovial fluid levels between the first and the last doses. The steady-state concentration of both isomers fluctuated less in synovial fluid than in plasma, and the synovial fluid concentrations of the S(+) isomer were about twice that of the R(-) isomer. The mean synovial albumin concentration was about 60% of the serum albumin concentration, and the steady-state isomer AUC values in synovial fluid were significantly correlated with the corresponding serum values after the differences between the two fluids with respect to albumin concentration were corrected. The authors conclude that binding of the isomers to albumin and the serum-synovial fluid albumin ratio controls the steady-state distribution of the ibuprofen isomers into synovial fluid. The ramifications of these findings in the development of satisfactory concentration-response relationships are discussed.