RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Phimosis is the inability to retract the preputium downward over the glans penis. Despite the various techniques of preputial plasty described in literature, the most performed surgical treatment is still the conventional circumcision. METHODS: In this paper we retrospectively reviewed data of a homogeneous population of 36 consecutive adult patients who underwent phimosis correction by circumcsion with dissection of the Deep Fascia. Patients were followed up by one independent plastic surgeon that measured penis length and circumference in nonerected state preoperatively and at 6 month time postoperatively. RESULTS: The Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test showed a significant (p < 0.0001) difference between the two groups both in terms of length and circumference. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the ancillary technique we described leads to an increase of penis size, is safe and easy to perform and does not increase significantly operative time nor complication rate to the conventional procedure.
Assuntos
Circuncisão Masculina/métodos , Prepúcio do Pênis/cirurgia , Fimose/cirurgia , Adulto , Fasciotomia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Tamanho do Órgão , Pênis/anatomia & histologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Standard open repair of true or false aneurysms of the aortic arch usually require cardiopulmonary bypass, hypothermia and circulatory arrest, associated with increased mortality and morbidity rates. Thus, an alternative strategy that avoids cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and hypothermic circulatory arrest would benefit the patient. Endovascular stent-grafting has developed as a safe and effective treatment for descending aortic pathologies.5,6 We share our experience with the endovascular approach to pseudoaneurysm of the aortic arch in a patient with high risk for aortic arch replacement under extracorporal circulation. KEY WORDS: Aortic arch, Endoprosthesis, Evar, Penetrating ulcer.