Normal Costoclavicular Distance as a Standard in the Radiological Evaluation of Thoracic Outlet Syndrome in the Costoclavicular Space.

BACKGROUND: The costoclavicular space is a common site of thoracic outlet syndrome. When there is no anatomical alteration, the diagnosis of thoracic outlet syndrome is difficult. Several authors relate costoclavicular distance to symptoms of thoracic outlet syndrome; however, there is no standardized site for measurement of the costoclavicular distance. This study aimed to determine the standard costoclavicular distance at neurovascular bundle crossing points (near the subclavian vein [Measure V] and the subclavian artery/brachial plexus branches [Measure NA]) using high-resolution chest computed tomography (CT) scans and evaluate its variations with respect to age, sex, height, and body mass index. METHODS: This prospective cross-sectional observational study analyzed 150 of 156 CT scans from consecutive adult patients (72 females and 78 males). Costoclavicular distance was measured at the subclavian vein and brachial plexus/subclavian artery sites, where narrowing of the costoclavicular distance could lead to symptoms of thoracic outlet syndrome. Costoclavicular distance was analyzed with respect to sex, laterality, age group (<50 and ≥50 years) and body mass index group (body mass index <25 and ≥25 kg/m2). RESULTS: Measures of V and NA were normally distributed. The measured costoclavicular distances were 1.23 cm (±0.40) and 1.24 cm (±0.47), respectively. Age (≥50 years) and body mass index (≥25 kg/m2) increased the costoclavicular distance. Measurements V and NA below the fifth percentile indicated a narrowed costoclavicular distance and a greater chance of developing thoracic outlet syndrome. For young (<50 years) and eutrophic patients (body mass index <25 kg/m2), these measurements were 0.46 and 0.44 cm, respectively; for young people and body mass index ≥25 kg/m2, they were 0.54 and 0.24 cm, respectively; for the elderly (≥50 years) and eutrophic, they were 0.57 and 0.48 cm, respectively; and for the elderly and body mass index ≥ 25 kg/m2, they were 0.83 and 0.73 cm, respectively. There was no significant difference between measurements V and NA regarding patient laterality, gender, and height. CONCLUSIONS: Standardization of costoclavicular distance measurements at neurovascular bundle crossing points (subclavian vein and brachial plexus/subclavian artery) is possible. It may aid the diagnosis and help direct the therapeutic indications for symptomatic patients with thoracic outlet syndrome.

The similarities and differences among patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms referred to a tertiary hospital and found at necropsy.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the characteristics of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms referred to a tertiary center and to compare with individuals with abdominal aortic aneurysm found at necropsy. METHODS: We have retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 556 patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm and 102 cases abdominal aortic aneurysm found at necropsy. RESULTS: At univariated analysis, hypertension, tobacco use and maximum diameter were significant risk factors for symptomatic aneurysm, while diabetes tended to be a protective factor for rupture. By logistic regression analysis, the largest transverse diameter was the only one significantly associated with abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture (p < .0001, odds ratio 1.7, 95% confidence interval 1.481-1.951). Intact abdominal aortic aneurysm found at necropsy showed similarities with outpatients in relation to abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter and risk factors. CONCLUSION: Intact abdominal aortic aneurysm at necropsy and at outpatients setting showed similarities that confirmed that abdominal aortic aneurysm repair is less offered to women, and they died more frequently with intact abdominal aortic aneurysm from other causes.