Identification and diagnosis of Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis during the clinical encounter: Results from a physician survey.

BACKGROUND: It is difficult to characterize the transition from relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) to secondary progressive MS (SPMS), due to symptomatic variability across patients. Diagnosis of SPMS is prolonged and often established retrospectively, as it is based on patient clinical history and symptoms. This cross-sectional study aimed to identify MS neurologist reported clinical indicators deemed important in diagnosing SPMS in clinical practice. METHODS: A web-based quantitative survey was conducted among MS-treating neurologists across the United States in January 2019. The questionnaire comprised of 17 questions evaluating primary clinical indicators used by neurologists in assessing patient progression to SPMS. Treatment approach and factors influencing treatment decision-making following SPMS diagnosis were also analyzed in the survey. RESULTS: Overall, 300 neurologists completed the survey; most of the respondents were general MS-treating neurologists (63%) and from private care setting (58%). The overall respondents as well as MS-focused neurologists ranked patient history (45% and 42%, respectively) and patients' neurological exam (39% and 44%, respectively) as -primary clinical indicators of SPMS diagnosis. 57% of neurologists always or mostly switched disease modifying therapies after progression to SPMS, and mostly considered 3-6 months' assessment interval to diagnose SPMS. CONCLUSION: The survey indicated that neurologists are able to recognize signs of SPMS within six months of symptomatic assessment. The diagnosis is primarily based on patient history among MS-treating neurologists. Therefore, continued education to neurologists may facilitate early diagnosis and timely introduction of effective treatment to manage the progression of SPMS.

Inpatient and outpatient treatment patterns of cancer-associated thrombosis in the United States.

Low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are among the recommended treatment options for cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) in the 2019 National Comprehensive Care Network guidelines. Little is known about the current utilization of DOACs in CAT patients, particularly on the inpatient to outpatient therapy transition. This study assessed real-world treatment patterns of CAT in hospital/ED in adult cancer patients (≥ 18 years) diagnosed with CAT during a hospital visit in IQVIA's Hospital Charge Data Master database between July 1, 2015 and April 30, 2018, and followed their outpatient medical and pharmacy claims to evaluate the initial inpatient/ED and outpatient anticoagulants received within 3 months post-discharge. Results showed that LMWH and unfractionated heparin (UFH) were the most common initial inpatient/ED CAT treatments (35.2% and 27.4%, respectively), followed by DOACs (9.6%); 20.8% of patients received no anticoagulants. Most DOAC patients remained on DOACs from inpatient/ED to outpatient settings (71.4%), while 24.1%, 43.5%, and 0.1% of patients treated with LMWH, warfarin, or UFH respectively, remained on the same therapy after discharge. In addition, DOACs were the most common initial post-discharge outpatient therapy. Outpatient treatment persistence and adherence appeared higher in patients using DOACs or warfarin versus LMWH or UFH. This study shows that DOACs are used as an inpatient/ED treatment option for CAT, and are associated with less post-discharge treatment switching and higher persistence and adherence. Further research generating real-world evidence on the role of DOACs to help inform the complex CAT clinical treatment decisions is warranted.