Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Acad Nutr Diet ; 121(1S): S9-S21, 2021 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33342530

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: To reduce childhood hunger, the US Department of Agriculture funded several innovative demonstration projects, including the Kentucky Ticket to Healthy Food project. OBJECTIVE: The study tested the hypothesis that Ticket to Healthy Food would reduce child food insecurity (FI-C) among rural, low-income households. DESIGN: The study used a randomized controlled trial in which households were randomly assigned to treatment and control groups. Outcomes were measured using household surveys and administrative data. Survey data were collected at baseline (n=2,202) and follow-up (n=1,639) 8 to 11 months into the project. PARTICIPANTS/SETTING: Households in 17 counties in southeastern Kentucky that had at least 1 child younger than 18 years and received a Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefit amount less than the maximum at baseline. INTERVENTION: Between January 2017 and March 2018, treatment households on SNAP received additional monthly benefits ranging from $1 to $122 based on distance to grocery store and earned income. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Key outcomes included FI-C (primary), food insecurity among adults and households, and food expenditures (secondary). STATISTICAL ANALYSES PERFORMED: Logistic and linear regression models were used to estimate differences between the treatment and control groups, controlling for baseline characteristics. Socioeconomic subgroups were also analyzed. RESULTS: The Kentucky Ticket to Healthy Food project did not reduce the primary outcome, FI-C (treatment=37.1%, control=35.2%; P=0.812), or secondary outcomes of very low food security among children (treatment=3.7%, control=4.4%; P=0.204) or food insecurity among adults (treatment=53.9%, control=53.0%; P=0.654). The project increased households' monthly food spending by $20 (P=0.030) and led more households to report that monthly benefits lasted at least 3 weeks (treatment=65%, control=56%; P=0.009). CONCLUSION: A demonstration project to reduce FI-C by raising SNAP benefits for Kentucky households with children did not reduce FI-C or other food insecurity measures. Future research should explore the effect of different increases in SNAP benefits and collect repeated measures of FI-C to assess whether intervention effects change over time. FUNDING/SUPPORT: This article is published as part of a supplement supported by the US Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service.


Assuntos
Transtornos da Nutrição Infantil/prevenção & controle , Assistência Alimentar/estatística & dados numéricos , Segurança Alimentar/economia , Pobreza/estatística & dados numéricos , População Rural/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Criança , Características da Família , Feminino , Assistência Alimentar/economia , Segurança Alimentar/métodos , Humanos , Kentucky , Masculino , Pobreza/economia , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Análise de Regressão
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...