Pre-Incisional and Multiple Intradermal Injection of N-Acetylcysteine Slightly Improves Incisional Wound Healing in an Animal Model.

The objective of this study was to investigate if delivering multiple doses of N-acetylcysteine (NAC) post-surgery in addition to pre-incisional administration significantly impacts the wound healing process in a rat model. Full-thickness skin incisions were carried out on the dorsum of 24 Sprague-Dawley rats in six locations. Fifteen minutes prior to the incision, half of the sites were treated with a control solution, with the wounds on the contralateral side treated with solutions containing 0.015%, 0.03% and 0.045% of NAC. In the case of the NAC treated group, further injections were given every 8 h for three days. On days 3, 7, 14 and 60 post-op, rats were sacrificed to gather material for the histological analysis, which included histomorphometry, collagen fiber organization analysis, immunohistochemistry and Abramov scale scoring. It was determined that scars treated with 0.015% NAC had significantly lower reepithelization than the control at day 60 post-op (p = 0.0018). Scars treated with 0.045% NAC had a significantly lower collagen fiber variance compared to 0.015% NAC at day 14 post-op (p = 0.02 and p = 0.04) and a lower mean scar width than the control at day 60 post-op (p = 0.0354 and p = 0.0224). No significant differences in the recruitment of immune cells and histological parameters were found. The results point to a limited efficacy of multiple NAC injections post-surgery in wound healing.

VEGF and Other Gene Therapies Improve Flap Survival-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Preclinical Studies.

Surgical flaps are basic tools in reconstructive surgery. Their use may be limited by ischemia and necrosis. Few therapies address or prevent them. Genetic therapy could improve flap outcomes, but primary studies in this field present conflicting results. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to appraise the efficacy of external gene delivery to the flap for its survival in preclinical models. This review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022359982). PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched to identify studies using animal models reporting flap survival outcomes following any genetic modifications. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to calculate mean differences in flap survival with accompanying 95% CI. The risk of bias was assessed using the SYRCLE tool. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed to ascertain the robustness of primary analyses, and the evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. The initial search yielded 690 articles; 51 were eventually included, 36 of which with 1576 rats were meta-analyzed. VEGF gene delivery to different flap types significantly improved flap survival area by 15.66% (95% CI 11.80-19.52). Other interventions had smaller or less precise effects: PDGF-13.44% (95% CI 3.53-23.35); VEGF + FGF-8.64% (95% CI 6.94-10.34); HGF-5.61% (95% CI 0.43-10.78); FGF 3.84% (95% CI 1.13-6.55). Despite considerable heterogeneity, moderate risk of bias, and low quality of evidence, the efficacy of VEGF gene therapy remained significant in all sensitivity analyses. Preclinical data indicate that gene therapy is effective for increasing flap survival, but further animal studies are required for successful clinical translation.

Forgotten Poles in the history of neurology: from Flatau to Frey.

With the majority of eponyms being removed from disease classification systems, it is even more difficult to remember the neurologists who influenced the development of techniques and understanding of the brain over the last centuries. Determining whether Polish researchers were given similar attention to Western equivalents based on eponymic presence in medical databases is an interesting way to provide an overview of unremembered Polish neurologists. This work aims to recognize the developments of forgotten Polish neurologists, whose work, although important, was not properly appreciated over the centuries.

Con la eliminación de la mayoría de los epónimos de los sistemas de clasificación de enfermedades, es aún más difícil recordar a los neurólogos que influyeron en el desarrollo de técnicas y comprensión del cerebro durante los últimos siglos. Determinar si los investigadores polacos recibieron una atención similar a la de los equivalentes occidentales en función de la presencia de los epónimos en las bases de datos médicos es una forma interesante de proporcionar una visión general de los neurólogos polacos no recordados. Este trabajo tiene como objetivo reconocer los desarrollos de los neurólogos polacos olvidados, cuyo trabajo, aunque importante, no fue debidamente apreciado a lo largo de los siglos.

Forgotten Poles in the history of neurology: from Flatau to Frey / Polacos olvidados en la historia de la neurología: de Flatau a Frey

Abstract With the majority of eponyms being removed from disease classification systems, it is even more difficult to remember the neurologists who influenced the development of techniques and understanding of the brain over the last centuries. Determining whether Polish researchers were given similar attention to Western equivalents based on eponymic presence in medical databases is an interesting way to provide an overview of unremembered Polish neurologists. This work aims to recognize the developments of forgotten Polish neurologists, whose work, although important, was not properly appreciated over the centuries.

Resumen Con la eliminación de la mayoría de los epónimos de los sistemas de clasificación de enfermedades, es aún más difícil recordar a los neurólogos que influyeron en el desarrollo de técnicas y comprensión del cerebro durante los últimos siglos. Determinar si los investigadores polacos recibieron una atención similar a la de los equivalentes occidentales en función de la presencia de los epónimos en las bases de datos médicos es una forma interesante de proporcionar una visión general de los neurólogos polacos no recordados. Este trabajo tiene como objetivo reconocer los desarrollos de los neurólogos polacos olvidados, cuyo trabajo, aunque importante, no fue debidamente apreciado a lo largo de los siglos.