A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Clinical Studies on Ankylosing Spondylitis and Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio.

BACKGROUND: Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a marker for many inflammatory diseases. Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is among these inflammatory diseases, and many studies have compared the NLR ratio between patients with AS and healthy controls. AIM: This study aims to systematically review and analyze the available evidence about the significance of NLR values in AS. METHOD: Based on Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines, we searched Embase, Pubmed, ISI Web of Science, and Scopus databases from inception to August 2020 using ("Ankylosing spondyl* " OR "Bechterew Disease" OR "Rheumatoid Spondylitis") AND ((neutrophil* AND lymphocyte*) OR NLR) as key terms of the search strategy. Data selection and extraction were conducted separately by two authors. We appraised the included articles according to the Joanna Briggs checklist. Comprehensive Meta-analysis Version 2 was used for analysis and assessment of publication bias. I2 > 75% and p-value < 0.05 were considered significant. RESULT: In total, 182 studies resulted from a search in all databases. Duplicate removal, title, abstract, and full-text screening yielded 12 related studies, with 11 included in the meta-analysis. Quality assessment was satisfying in all studies. Pooled difference in NLR means value between patients and controls was 0.38 (95% CI: 0.24-0.52, p-value <0.0001). An I2 of 51% and a Cochran Q test p-value of <0.05 indicated moderate heterogeneity; thus, subgroup analysis had no indication. Publication bias was not significant (Funnel plot with an Egger's intercept of -0.07; p-value=0.95). CONCLUSION: Significant higher amounts of NLR may be strongly indicative of underlying inflammation in AS.

Lethal area 50 percent (LA50) or standardized mortality ratio (SMR): Which one is more conclusive?

BACKGROUND: Burn injuries impose a considerable burden on healthcare systems. It is among the top ten causes of mortality and a major cause of disability. This study aimed to calculate and compare the lethal area fifty percent (LA50) and standardized mortality ratio (SMR) in patients with burns. METHODS: This is a five-year cross-sectional study. The study population consisted of 3284 patients with acute burns who were admitted to the Burn Department of Imam Reza Hospital in Mashhad, Iran, from 2010 to 2015. LA50 and SMR were calculated. SPSS 16 was used for logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The mean percentage of burn total body surface area (TBSA%) was 37.0 (25.5), and deceased patients with burns had a significantly higher burn TBSA% than alive discharged patients (70.3 (24.2) vs. 28.1 (17.1), p<0.001). The most common cause of burn was fire (71.7%). The total case fatality rate was 21.2%. However, this index was more than double in females than in males (31.9% vs. 14.3%, p<0.001). The SMR, based on the abbreviated burn severity index (ABSI), increased from 61% to 80% during the 5-year period. LA50 for total admitted patients was 63.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]=60.4-67.7). LA50 for scalds was the highest (72.1%) compared to those of other types of mechanisms of burn injuries. TBSA, age, and gender were found to be mutually independent predictors of death. CONCLUSION: The trend of LA50 in these five years declined by 12%, whereas the SMR was below 100%. Improvement in burn management quality in high-risk groups including the elderly, females, and patients with extensive burns may improve LA50 in burn units. However, LA50 alone is not a conclusive index for the performance of a burn department, and it should be interpreted alongside with SMR.