Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Rev Neurol (Paris) ; 158(8-9): 807-12, 2002 Sep.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12386525

RESUMO

Six hundred and sixty nine out patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease were enrolled by 193 French neurologists, psychiatrists and gerontologists. The patients, 38p.cent males and 62p.cent females with a mean age of 75 years were progressively titrated from 3 to 12mg by day of rivastigmine, Exelon((R)), a day, and treated for 6 months. Mean Mini-Mental State (MMS) at baseline was 18.6. Concomitant pathologies and treatments were present in 89p.cent of the patients. Safety was good though 86p.cent reported an adverse event which was mild in most of the cases. The premature drop out rate was 29p.cent. Seventy-five patients showed no change or an improvement in their 4 Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) score with no change in the MMS at the end of treatment (18.8). Four items of the Neuro-Psychiatric Inventory (NPI): delusions, anxiety, apathy, and irritability were significantly improved at week 12 and the improvement in anxiety was still significant at the end of treatment. The total score frequency X severity showed a tendency to improvement. The correlations between the sum of the 4 IADL, MMS and NPI scores were strongly significant.


Assuntos
Doença de Alzheimer/tratamento farmacológico , Carbamatos/uso terapêutico , Inibidores da Colinesterase/uso terapêutico , Transtornos Cognitivos/diagnóstico , Fenilcarbamatos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Tolerância a Medicamentos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Rivastigmina , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
2.
Therapie ; 48(3): 233-8, 1993.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7908147

RESUMO

In order to compare two titrations of Parlodel in early combination with levodopa in the treatment of Parkinson's disease a multicentre randomized open study was performed with a fast titration in group A (15 mg/day for 3 weeks) and slow in group B (15 mg/day for 5 weeks). 153 patients were included: 77 in group A and 76 in group B. The recommended titration was observed in 76% in group A and 88% in group B, the difference was not significant. The efficacy assessed by the Webster Scale was remarkable and similar in the two groups. This study confirms the additive benefit of bromocriptine on the symptoms and long term complications of levodopa therapy, but no absolute conclusion can be drawn regarding the best titration.


Assuntos
Bromocriptina/uso terapêutico , Dopaminérgicos/uso terapêutico , Levodopa/uso terapêutico , Doença de Parkinson/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Bromocriptina/administração & dosagem , Dopaminérgicos/administração & dosagem , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Levodopa/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Tempo
3.
Therapie ; 48(3): 201-5, 1993.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8140558

RESUMO

Therapeutic trials conducted in Alzheimer's disease have benefited from the standardization of diagnostic criteria based on internationally recognized scales (DSM III-R, NINCDS-ADRDA) which ensure more valid inclusions. Well specified exclusion criteria are also of the utmost importance, in particular depression, vascular dementia and concomitant psychotropic drugs. Cognitive and/or functional scales allow an appreciation of the severity of the disease. Due to the heterogeneity of Alzheimer's disease stratification methods on identified prognostic factors i.e. aphasia, extrapyramidal symptoms should be performed. Selection of responders during an enrichment phase has still to be discussed. Multicentric studies become imperative because of the large number of patients required and the difficulties in selecting the adequate patients. These raise the issues of investigators' experience, coordination and between center variability.


Assuntos
Doença de Alzheimer/diagnóstico , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Doença de Alzheimer/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Prognóstico , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
4.
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol ; 29(8): 314-22, 1991 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1743806

RESUMO

Parlodel-SRO is a newly developed slow-release formulation of bromocriptine, which prevents initial plasma peak--a known source of adverse events--and extends the half-life of the compound, an interesting feature for the management of motor symptoms in Parkinsonians. This study was designed to determine the best daily administration schedule for 30 mg Parlodel-SRO in 18 parkinsonians previously treated with levodopa and standard Bromocriptine (Br). The 30 mg dose was replaced from one day to the next, in a randomized, double-blind latin square design trial. Three consecutive 7-day courses were implemented, during which a total daily dose of 30 mg P-SRO was administered in one dose, two intakes (b.i.d.) and three intakes, (t.i.d.) respectively. The b.i.d. schedule produced the best improvement in UPDRS scores, especially as to postural stability, walking, bradykinesia; it also provided greater pharmacological stability throughout the assessment day. Adverse event analysis was not in favor of a single daily dose. It appeared that P-SRO administered in two 15 mg intakes (morning and evening) produces the best benefit-risk ratio in Parkinsonians who were already being treated with levodopa.


Assuntos
Bromocriptina/administração & dosagem , Levodopa/uso terapêutico , Doença de Parkinson/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Comportamento/efeitos dos fármacos , Bromocriptina/efeitos adversos , Bromocriptina/uso terapêutico , Preparações de Ação Retardada , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doença de Parkinson/metabolismo , Doença de Parkinson/psicologia
5.
Arch Neurol ; 46(6): 646-8, 1989 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2658924

RESUMO

The reliability of the clinical diagnosis of dementia was estimated by comparing the diagnosis made at 1-year intervals on 55 consecutive subjects with suspected cognitive impairment seen at three different centers by neurologists and gerontologists. The diagnosis was based on history and clinical examination, the criteria of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (revised ed 3), the Modified Ischemic Score, and a computed tomographic scan. Fifty-two of 55 subjects were given the same diagnosis a year later indicating a reliability of 95%. The study shows that a diagnosis of dementia established by simple clinical criteria comparable to the NINCDS/ADRDA criteria affords sufficient reliability to allow the comparability of groups at different centers for purposes of research, including research on the evaluation of the efficacy of pharmacologic treatment.


Assuntos
Demência/diagnóstico , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Feminino , Seguimentos , Geriatria/métodos , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Entrevista Psiquiátrica Padronizada , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...