Implementation of fetal clinical exome sequencing: Comparing prospective and retrospective cohorts.

PURPOSE: We compared the diagnostic yield of fetal clinical exome sequencing (fCES) in prospective and retrospective cohorts of pregnancies presenting with anomalies detected using ultrasound. We evaluated factors that led to a higher diagnostic efficiency, such as phenotypic category, clinical characterization, and variant analysis strategy. METHODS: fCES was performed for 303 fetuses (183 ongoing and 120 ended pregnancies, in which chromosomal abnormalities had been excluded) using a trio/duo-based approach and a multistep variant analysis strategy. RESULTS: fCES identified the underlying genetic cause in 13% (24/183) of prospective and 29% (35/120) of retrospective cases. In both cohorts, recessive heterozygous compound genotypes were not rare, and trio and simplex variant analysis strategies were complementary to achieve the highest possible diagnostic rate. Limited prenatal phenotypic information led to interpretation challenges. In 2 prospective cases, in-depth analysis allowed expansion of the spectrum of prenatal presentations for genetic syndromes associated with the SLC17A5 and CHAMP1 genes. CONCLUSION: fCES is diagnostically efficient in fetuses presenting with cerebral, skeletal, urinary, or multiple anomalies. The comparison between the 2 cohorts highlights the importance of providing detailed phenotypic information for better interpretation and prenatal reporting of genetic variants.

Spontaneous resolution of nonimmune hydrops fetalis in a fetus with TP63 gene mutation and LZTR1 gene variants.

In cases of fetal hydrops, searching for an etiology is essential to evaluate the fetal prognosis and propose the most appropriate management.

Cell-free DNA analysis in maternal blood: comparing genome-wide versus targeted approach as a first-line screening test.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the failure rate and performance of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing as a first-line screening method for major trisomies, performed by two laboratories using different analytical methods: a targeted chromosome-selective method (Harmony® prenatal Test) versus a home-brew genome-wide (GW) massively parallel sequencing method (HB-cfDNA test), and to evaluate the clinical value of incidental findings for the latter method. METHODS: CfDNA testing was performed in 3137 pregnancies with the Harmony® prenatal Test and in 3373 pregnancies with the HB-cfDNA test. Propensity score analysis was used to match women between both groups for maternal age, weight, gestational age at testing, in vitro fertilization, rate of twin pregnancies and that of aneuploidies. Detection rates for trisomy 21 were compared between the 2 laboratories. For the HB-cfDNA test, cases with rare incidental findings were reported, including their clinical follow-up. RESULTS: The Harmony® prenatal Test failed at the first attempt in 90 (2.9%) of 3114 women and the HB-cfDNA test in 413 (12.2%) of 3373 women. Postmatched comparisons of the women's characteristics indicate a significantly lower failure rate in the Harmony® group (2.8%) than in the HB cfDNA group (12.4%; p < .001). Of the 90 women in whom the Harmony® prenatal Test failed, 61 had a repeat test, which still failed in 10, and of the 413 women in whom the HB-cfDNA test failed, 379 had a repeat test, which still failed in 110. The total failure rate after one or two attempts was therefore 1.3% (39/3114) for Harmony® and 4.3% (144/3373) for the HB cfDNA test. After the first or second Harmony® prenatal Test, a high-risk result was noted in 17 of the 17 cases with trisomy 21, in 5 of the seven cases with trisomy 18, and a no-call in two cases, and in the one case with trisomy 13. The respective numbers for the HB-cfDNA test are 17 of the 18 cases with trisomy 21, and a no-call in one case, 2 of the two cases with trisomy 18, and in 2 of the three cases with trisomy 13, and a no-call in one. Of the 3373 women with the HB-cfDNA test, a rare incidental finding was noted in 28 (0.8%) of the cases, of which only 2 were confirmed on amniocytes (one with microduplication 1q21.1q21.2 and one with a deletion Xp21.1), and in another case a deletion rather than a duplication of the long arm of chromosome 8 was found. In all 28 cases, there was normal clinical follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Comparison of cfDNA testing between these two laboratories showed a four-fold lower failure rate with the Harmony® prenatal Test, with a similar detection rate for trisomy 21. We showed no clinical relevance of disclosing additional findings beyond common trisomies with the GW HB-cfDNA test.

Middle interhemispheric variant of holoprosencephaly: First prenatal report of a ZIC2 missense mutation.

We present a case of a middle interhemispheric variant of antenatal discovery associated with a de novo missense variant (NM_007129.5: c.1109G>A p.(Cys370Tyr)) in the ZIC2 gene. Our case represents the first prenatal description of a ZIC2 missense mutation found in association with syntelencephaly.