Understanding the Role of Imide-Based Salts and Borate-Based Additives for Safe and High-Performance Glyoxal-Based Electrolytes in Ni-Rich NMC811 Cathodes for Li-Ion Batteries.

Herein, the design of novel and safe electrolyte formulations for high-voltage Ni-rich cathodes is reported. The solvent mixture comprising 1,1,2,2-tetraethoxyethane and propylene carbonate not only displays good transport properties, but also greatly enhances the overall safety of the cell thanks to its low flammability. The influence of the conducting salts, that is, lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (LiTFSI) and lithium bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide (LiFSI), and of the additives lithium bis(oxalato)borate (LiBOB) and lithium difluoro(oxalato)borate (LiDFOB) is examined. Molecular dynamics simulations are carried out to gain insights into the local structure of the different electrolytes and the lithium-ion coordination. Furthermore, special emphasis is placed on the film-forming abilities of the salts to suppress the anodic dissolution of the aluminum  current collector and to create a stable cathode electrolyte interphase (CEI). In this regard, the borate-based additives significantly alleviate the intrinsic challenges associated with the use of LiTFSI and LiFSI salts. It is worth remarking that a superior cathode performance is achieved by using the LiFSI/LiDFOB electrolyte, displaying a high specific capacity of 164 mAh g-1 at 6 C and ca. 95% capacity retention after 100 cycles at 1 C. This is attributed to the rich chemistry of the generated CEI layer, as confirmed by ex situ X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy.

An XPS Study of Electrolytes for Li-Ion Batteries in Full Cell LNMO vs Si/Graphite.

Two different types of electrolytes (co-solvent and multi-salt) are tested for use in high voltage LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4||Si/graphite full cells and compared against a carbonate-based standard LiPF6 containing electrolyte (baseline). Ex situ postmortem XPS analysis on both anodes and cathodes over the life span of the cells reveals a continuously growing SEI and CEI for the baseline electrolyte. The cells cycled in the co-solvent electrolyte exhibited a relatively thick and long-term stable CEI (on LNMO), while a slowly growing SEI was determined to form on the Si/graphite. The multi-salt electrolyte offers more inorganic-rich SEI/CEI while also forming the thinnest SEI/CEI observed in this study. Cross-talk is identified in the baseline electrolyte cell, where Si is detected on the cathode, and Mn is detected on the anode. Both the multi-salt and co-solvent electrolytes are observed to substantially reduce this cross-talk, where the co-solvent is found to be the most effective. In addition, Al corrosion is detected for the multi-salt electrolyte mainly at its end-of-life stage, where Al can be found on both the anode and cathode. Although the co-solvent electrolyte offers superior interface properties in terms of the limitation of cross-talk, the multi-salt electrolyte offers the best overall performance, suggesting that interface thickness plays a superior role compared to cross-talk. Together with their electrochemical cycling performance, the results suggest that multi-salt electrolyte provides a better long-term passivation of the electrodes for high-voltage cells.