Clinical evaluation of instrumentation time and quality of obturation using paediatric hand and rotary file systems with conventional hand K-files for pulpectomy in primary mandibular molars: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial.

AIM: The present study aims to comparatively evaluate the instrumentation time and obturation quality using paediatric manual (Kedo-SH) and rotary (Kedo-S and Kedo-SG Blue) with conventional manual (Hand K-files) instrumentation technique for pulpectomy in primary mandibular molars. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A double-blinded randomized controlled trial was designed, recruiting participants with pulpally involved primary mandibular molars requiring pulpectomy in the age group of 6-9 years old. Sixty primary mandibular molars were randomly allocated to either of the four intervention groups: Group I: 15 teeth were instrumented using hand K-files (control group); Group II: 15 teeth were instrumented with paediatric rotary files (Kedo-S); Group III: 15 teeth were instrumented with paediatric hand files Kedo-SH (experimental group) and Group IV: 15 teeth were instrumented with paediatric rotary file system Kedo-SG Blue. Instrumentation time was recorded during root canal preparation and post-operative quality of obturation in each group was also assessed. Extracted data was subjected to statistical analysis using Chi-square, One-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey test. RESULTS: Mean instrumentation time was significantly reduced for Kedo-SG Blue (2.7840 ± 0.34217) min-s followed by Kedo-S (3.4827 ± 0.48657), Kedo-SH (5.8800 ± 0.48345) min-s and hand K-files (6.2167 ± 0.30978) min-s (p = 0.0005). A statistically significant difference was found in the obturation quality (p = 0.001) between the four groups with higher percentage of optimal fillings observed with rotary Kedo-SG Blue (80%) followed by Kedo-SH (46.7%); Kedo-S (40.0%) and hand K-files (20%). CONCLUSIONS: On comparative evaluation, a marked reduction in instrumentation time and superior quality of obturation was found with rotary Kedo-SG Blue file system followed by Kedo-SH, Kedo-S and hand K-files.

Clinical comparison of Kedo-S paediatric rotary files vs manual instrumentation for root canal preparation in primary molars: a double blinded randomised clinical trial.

AIM: This was to compare and evaluate the instrumentation time and quality of obturation between paediatric rotary file (Kedo-S) and manual instrumentation techniques in primary molars. METHODS: A double blinded randomised control trial was performed that included mandibular primary molars in children of age 4-7 years with pulp necrosis. Sixty primary mandibular molars were randomly divided into two groups: 30 were instrumented with paediatric rotary files Kedo-S (experimental group) and 30 with hand K-files (control group). During the preparation of the primary root canals the instrumentation time was recorded in seconds. The quality of obturation was recorded as optimal, under filled or over filled using immediate post-operative radiographs. The instrumentation time and quality of obturation were analysed using independent t-test and Chi-square test. RESULTS: Mean instrumentation time with paediatric rotary files Kedo-S (78.53 s) was significantly less than K-files (95.46 s) (p < 0.05). There was a significant improvement in the quality of obturation (p < 0.05) with paediatric rotary files (Kedo-S). CONCLUSION: Clinical use of paediatric rotary files Kedo-S was effective during root canal preparation of primary teeth with reduction in instrumentation time and better quality of obturation.