Feasibility of Intraoperative Proctosigmoidoscopy after Discoid Bowel Resection for Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis: A Pilot Multicenter Study.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Although surgery is the gold standard treatment for pain refractory to medical management or partial occlusion owing to rectosigmoid endometriosis, surgical resection can be associated with major perioperative complications. From general surgery experience, intraoperative proctosigmoidoscopy has shown encouraging results as a feasible, safe, and effective technique in reducing the risk of complications related to intestinal anastomosis after segmental resection. Unfortunately, there are no studies evaluating its role after discoid resection for rectosigmoid endometriosis. DESIGN: A pilot, multicentric, observational, prospective, cohort study. SETTING: Two academic hospitals, from March 1 to December 31, 2022. PATIENTS: We enrolled all consecutive fertile-age patients affected by symptomatic endometriosis scheduled for laparoscopic discoid bowel resection. Inclusion criteria were (1) age between 18 and 50 years, (2) diagnosis of rectosigmoid endometriosis performed by transvaginal ultrasound and/or magnetic resonance imaging, and (3) women scheduled for laparoscopic discoid bowel resection of endometriosis at low risk of segmental resection. INTERVENTIONS: During data analysis, enrolled patients were divided into 2 study groups for comparisons based on whether or not the intraoperative proctosigmoidoscopy was performed upon surgeons' discretion after discoid resection for treating endometriosis, in addition to standard integrity tests. Primary outcome was the rate of intraoperative proctosigmoidoscopy success. Secondary study outcomes were the differences between the intraoperative proctosigmoidoscopy group and the nonintraoperative proctosigmoidoscopy group in (1) mean of total operative time and (2) rate of perioperative complications. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 28 patients were enrolled and equally distributed in the 2 groups. The rate of intraoperative proctosigmoidoscopy success was 86%. No significant difference was reported between the 2 groups in terms of total operative time (p = .1) and intraoperative and postoperative complications (p = .5 and p = 1, respectively), with no surgical complication related to intraoperative proctosigmoidoscopy. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative proctosigmoidoscopy seems as a feasible and non-time-consuming intraoperative procedure in women undergone discoid resection for rectosigmoid endometriosis. Larger studies with longer follow-up period are necessary to confirm our findings and assess clinical benefits over standard procedure.

Not All Bad Comes to Harm: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery for Rectosigmoid Endometriosis.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of implementing an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol on the length of hospitalization in women undergoing laparoscopy for rectosigmoid deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE). DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. SETTING: An academic referral center for endometriosis and minimally invasive gynecologic surgery. PATIENTS: Women aged between 18 and 50 years scheduled for laparoscopic excision (shaving, full-thickness anterior wall resection, segmental resection) of rectosigmoid endometriosis between February 2017 and February 2023. INTERVENTIONS: We divided patients into 2 groups (non-ERAS and ERAS) based on the timing of surgery (before or after March 5, 2020). Starting from this day, restrictions were issued to limit the spread of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, inducing our group to implement an ERAS protocol for patients hospitalized after surgery for posterior DIE. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We included 579 patients in the analysis, 316 (54.6%) in the non-ERAS group and 263 (45.4%) in the ERAS group. In the ERAS group, we observed a shorter length of hospital stay (5.8 ± 3.1 days vs 4.8 ± 2.9 days; p <.001) and lower complications rates (33, 12.5% vs 60, 19.0%; p = .04), despite a decreased frequency of conservative surgical approaches (shaving procedures 121 vs 196; p <.001). Repeated surgery or hospital readmissions owing to postdischarge complications were infrequent, with no significant differences between the 2 groups. The multiple linear regression analysis strengthened our results given the higher prevalence of bowel resection surgeries (both full-thickness anterior wall or segmental), showing that patients managed with a multimodal protocol had an overall reduction of hospital stay by 1.5 days. CONCLUSION: The implementation of an ERAS program in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for DIE is associated with a significant reduction in hospital stay, without an increase in perioperative or postoperative complication rates.

Laparoscopic treatment of pelvic floor defects in women of reproductive age.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of conservative laparoscopic treatment of genital prolapse in women of reproductive age. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). SETTING: University hospital, Center of Reconstrutive Pelivc Endosurgery, Reproductive Medical Unit, S. Orsola Hospital, Bologna, Italy. PATIENTS: Fifteen women of reproductive age with genital prolapse. Interventions. Conservative laparoscopic surgical correction of genital prolapse. Apical prolapse was corrected by sacral colpohysteropexy. Burch colposuspension was always included to treat evident or latent stress urinary incontinence. Anterior compartment defects were treated by laparoscopic paravaginal repair and by the interposition of an intervesicouterine prosthesis. Posterior compartment defects were corrected by a prosthetic reconstruction of the rectovaginal support structure. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: All patients underwent surgery between January 1998 and December 2000. They were prospectively evaluated for a minimum of 24 months of follow-up. No woman underwent additional surgery during the follow-up period. All women had resolution of the apical prolapse. In one woman, anterior compartment correction (i.e., correction of the anterior part of endopelvic fascia, including correction of bladder and anterior vaginal wall prolapse) was reported. No woman underwent additional prolapse surgery during the follow-up period. Three women became pregnant after surgery: one had an abortion at 8 weeks' gestation; the other two completed term pregnancies and delivered by cesarean section. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic therapy of genital prolapse is a desirable procedure in patients of reproductive age because it respects the anatomic structures and maintains the function of the organs. Furthermore, laparoscopic treatment is feasible and well-tolerated and produces good results.

Total laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with abdominal hysterectomy in the presence of a large uterus.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate in a prospective series whether, even in presence of a large uterus, total laparoscopic hysterectomy is feasible and safe, and may be substituted for abdominal hysterectomy. DESIGN: Randomized comparison (Canadian Task Force classification I). Setting. Center for Reconstructive Pelvic Endosurgery, Bologna, Italy. PATIENTS: One hundred twenty-two women with large uterus (>14 wks' gestation) caused by myomas. INTERVENTION: Total laparoscopic hysterectomy and total abdominal hysterectomy. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Sixty women underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy (group 1) and 62 abdominal hysterectomy (group 2). Mean longitudinal diameter of the uterus, mean number and diameter of myomas, operating time, and average drop in hemoglobin were similar in the groups. One conversion to laparotomy was necessary because of a bowel injury in a patient with severe pelvic adhesions. Cystotomy occurred in one woman in group 2 and was immediately repaired. Febrile morbidity was statistically more frequent in group 2 than in group 1. Postoperative hospitalization and convalescence were statistically shorter in group 1. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic hysterectomy is safe and feasible even in the presence of large uterus, and is a valid alternative to abdominal hysterectomy when the vaginal route is contraindicated.