Tofacitinib in Pediatric Alopecia Areata Totalis and Alopecia Universalis: A Retrospective Analysis From India.

Alopecia areata totalis and universalis are disabling conditions and therapeutically challenging as they are refractory to conventional options. Tofacitinib is a Janus-kinase (JAK) inhibitor utilized to treat alopecia areata (AA) as an off-label drug. In India, FDA-approved JAK inhibitors such as baricitinib and ritlecitinib are not available. There are only a few case reports on tofacitinib in AA in the Indian population. We present the data of 9 pediatric cases of clinically and histologically proven alopecia areata totalis (AT) and alopecia universalis (AU), for whom oral tofacitinib was given after baseline investigations. The following parameters were analysed: Photographic image and severity of alopecia tool (SALT) score at baseline, 3 months and 6 months, and Children Dermatology Life Quality Index (cDLQI) at baseline and 6 months. The mean ± standard deviation (M ± SD) of the SALT score and cDLQI(M ± SD) at baseline were 95 ± 5 and 17 ± 2. At weeks 4 and weeks 12, the SALT (M ± SD) score was 92.7 ± 6.1 and 34.35 ± 11.16, respectively. At weeks 24, the SALT (M ± SD) score and cDLQI (M ± SD) were 3.33 ± 5 and 6 ± 2. The final reduction in SALT score from the baseline was 100% in 6/9 cases (66.67%), 75% to 99% in 3/9 (22.23%), and 50 to 75% in 1/9 (11.12%). We also observed minimal adverse effects (one child developed herpes zoster) with tofacitinib. Our study demonstrates that oral tofacitinib represents a viable modality in managing difficult-to-treat pediatric AA, such as AT and AU, with a good safety profile.

An unusual case of scalp ulceration.

ABSTRACT: Granulomatosis with polyangiitis, a form of necrotizing vasculitis can present as a limited variant with the involvement of a single organ system. The superficial protracted form can present as face and scalp ulceration for chronic periods of time. Diagnosis can be established histopathologically by examining the involvement of blood vessels. Here, we present a case of scalp ulceration that was diagnosed as a limited variant and started on steroids and immunosuppressants with excellent response.

Trichoscopic Features of Scalp Discoid Lupus Erythematosus versus Lichen Planopilaris: A Systematic Review.

Introduction: Lichen planopilaris (LPP) and discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) are primary scarring alopecias that pose diagnostic challenges clinically, where trichoscopy features may provide benefit in delineating these two cicatricial alopecia, and also helps in assessing the evolution and therapeutic response. To date, there are few reviews on dermoscopic findings in differentiating these two alopecias. Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted using the PubMed and Google Scholar databases. The search terms included for scalp DLE were 'lupus' OR 'discoid lupus' OR "scalp lupus" and for scalp LPP were "lichen planopilaris" OR "scalp follicular lichen planus" OR "lichen planus follicularis" and were combined with "dermoscopy" OR "dermatoscopy" OR "videodermoscopy" OR "video dermatoscopy" OR "trichoscopy". The differences in the prevalence of dermoscopic features in scalp DLE and LPP were calculated using the Chi-square test. Results: Of 52 articles, 36 (17 LPP, 19 DLE) were eligible for quantitative analysis. We found predominant peripilar tubular casts and perifollicular erythema with the presence of arborizing vessels in the vicinity of these changes, indicating early LPP. In contrast, follicular red dots, speckled brown pigmentation, and hair diameter variability indicated active DLE. Shiny white areas were common in both the groups in late stages. The target pattern of distribution of blue-grey dots, milky red areas, and irregular white fibrotic dots were seen in LPP, and pink-white background, follicular plugs, perifollicular and interfollicular scale, rosettes, chrysalides, and red spider on yellow dots were detected in DLE. Features such as yellow dots and blue-grey structureless areas were nonspecific and did not have a major role in differentiating DLE from LPP. Conclusion: This article provides a comprehensive review of the literature and delineates the trichoscopic differences and peculiarities of scalp DLE and LPP, including the correlation of dermoscopic features with histopathological findings.