Morbidity experienced by women before and after operative vaginal delivery: prospective cohort study nested within a two-centre randomised controlled trial of restrictive versus routine use of episiotomy.

OBJECTIVE: To explore: (1) the antenatal and postnatal morbidity experienced by women in relation to operative vaginal delivery (OVD); and (2) the impact of restrictive versus routine use of episiotomy. DESIGN: Longitudinal prospective cohort study embedded within a two-centre randomised controlled trial (RCT). SETTING: Two UK tertiary-level maternity units. POPULATION: Antenatally recruited participants of an RCT of restrictive versus routine use of episiotomy at OVD. METHODS: A self-completing questionnaire was administered antenatally, before hospital discharge, at 6 weeks and at 1 year postpartum. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Urinary and anal incontinence, dyspareunia, perineal pain and psychological morbidity. RESULTS: Longitudinal data have revealed that morbidities historically associated with OVD were often as prevalent, if not more prevalent, in the third trimester of pregnancy than postpartum. Restrictive episiotomy use was associated with: a higher incidence of perineal pain in the immediate postpartum period (98.9% restrictive versus 87.8% routine, RR 1.10, 95% CI 1.01-1.21); greater psychological morbidity in the immediate postpartum period (mean scores on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Score (EPDS) 6.7 restrictive versus 5.1 routine; P = 0.01 ); and more stress urinary incontinence at 6 weeks postpartum (42.2% restrictive versus 27.2% routine, RR 1.55, 95% CI 1.00-2.40); however, this had resolved by 1 year. No other differences were found between the groups at 6 weeks and 1 year postpartum. CONCLUSIONS: Morbidities previously attributed to OVD may in fact be present antenatally, to a greater or similar degree. A restrictive approach to the use of episiotomy at OVD may increase rates of urinary morbidity, in particular stress incontinence and perineal pain, in the immediate postpartum period.

A randomised controlled trial of routine versus restrictive use of episiotomy at operative vaginal delivery: a multicentre pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the maternal and neonatal outcomes of operative vaginal delivery in relation to the use of episiotomy. DESIGN: Pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT). SETTING: Two urban maternity units in Scotland and England. SAMPLE: Nulliparous women anticipating a singleton cephalic vaginal delivery were recruited in the antenatal period. METHODS: If an operative vaginal delivery was required in the second stage of labour, women were randomised to either routine (in all cases) or restrictive (only if tearing apparent) use of episiotomy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was anal sphincter tearing (third or fourth degree). Secondary outcomes included postpartum haemorrhage (PPH), neonatal trauma and pelvic floor symptoms up until 10 days postpartum. RESULTS: In a group of 317 women requiring operative vaginal delivery, 200 were randomised: 99 to routine use of episiotomy and 101 to restrictive use. There were small differences in the rates of anal sphincter tears (8.1% routine versus 10.9% restrictive, OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.28-1.87) and primary PPH (36.4% routine versus 26.7% restrictive, OR 1.57, 95% CI 0.86-2.86). Neonatal trauma was similar between the two groups (45.5% routine versus 43.6% restrictive, OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.62-1.89), as was prolonged catheterisation, urinary incontinence, faecal incontinence, perineal infection and prolonged hospital admission. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study does not provide conclusive evidence that a policy of routine episiotomy is better or worse than a restrictive policy. A definitive RCT is feasible but will require a large sample size to inform clinical practice.

A prospective cohort study of maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to use of episiotomy at operative vaginal delivery.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the maternal and neonatal morbidity of operative vaginal delivery in relation to the use of episiotomy. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Two urban maternity units in Scotland and England. POPULATION: All nonrandomised nulliparous women delivered by forceps or vacuum during the recruitment period of a clinical trial evaluating the use of episiotomy at operative vaginal delivery. METHODS: Use of episiotomy was compared to no episiotomy for all operative vaginal deliveries with sub-group analyses for forceps or vacuum deliveries. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was anal sphincter tearing (third or fourth degree). Secondary outcomes included postpartum haemorrhage, neonatal trauma and pelvic floor symptoms up until 10 days postpartum. RESULTS: A total of 1360 women were included in the study, of whom 294 (21.6%) did not receive an episiotomy. Vacuum delivery was associated with less use of episiotomy than forceps (56.1 versus 89.4%, OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.11-0.20). Anal sphincter tear rates were not statistically different with use of episiotomy compared with no episiotomy (9.9 versus 7.1%, adjusted OR 1.11, 95% CI 0.66-1.87). Episiotomy use was associated with higher rates of postpartum haemorrhage (28.5 versus 18.4%, adjusted OR 1.72, 95% CI 1.21-2.45), need for moderate or strong analgesia (90.5 versus 67.6%, adjusted OR 3.70, 95% CI 2.60-5.27), perineal infection (5.1 versus 1.4%, adjusted OR 4.04, 95% CI 1.44-11.37) and neonatal trauma (38.1 versus 22.0%, adjusted OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.20-2.27). Use of episiotomy did not reduce the risk of shoulder dystocia (3.5 versus 1.7%, adjusted OR 1.42, 95% CI 0.53-3.85). CONCLUSIONS: The use of episiotomy did not reduce or greatly increase anal sphincter tears and was associated with greater maternal and neonatal morbidity. This may reflect the complexity of deliveries. The role of episiotomy at operative vaginal delivery should be evaluated in a randomised controlled trial.