Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Prosthet Dent ; 110(2): 82-9, 2013 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23929369

RESUMO

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Currently, no commercially available facial shade guide exists in the United States for the fabrication of facial prostheses. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to measure facial skin and lip color in a human population sample stratified by age, gender, and race. Clustering analysis was used to determine optimal color coordinates for a proposed facial shade guide. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Participants (n=119) were recruited from 4 racial/ethnic groups, 5 age groups, and both genders. Reflectance measurements of participants' noses and lower lips were made by using a spectroradiometer and xenon arc lamp with a 45/0 optical configuration. Repeated measures ANOVA (α=.05), to identify skin and lip color differences, resulting from race, age, gender, and location, and a hierarchical clustering analysis, to identify clusters of skin colors) were used. RESULTS: Significant contributors to L*a*b* facial color were race and facial location (P<.01). b* affected all factors (P<.05). Age affected only b* (P<.001), while gender affected only L* (P<.05) and b* (P<.05). Analyses identified 5 clusters of skin color. CONCLUSIONS: The study showed that skin color caused by age and gender primarily occurred within the yellow-blue axis. A significant lightness difference between gender groups was also found. Clustering analysis identified 5 distinct skin shade tabs.


Assuntos
Face/anatomia & histologia , Lábio/anatomia & histologia , Pigmentação em Prótese/instrumentação , Desenho de Prótese/instrumentação , Pigmentação da Pele/fisiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Povo Asiático , População Negra , Análise por Conglomerados , Cor , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nariz/anatomia & histologia , Projetos Piloto , Radiometria/instrumentação , Fatores Sexuais , População Branca , Adulto Jovem
2.
J Prosthet Dent ; 101(1): 46-53, 2009 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19105991

RESUMO

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: It remains unclear which gingival shade guide is most effective in producing the best visual shade match. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine and compare the coverage errors (CEs) of 2 different gingival shade guides and their combination in a selected population. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The CEs of the following gingival shade guides were evaluated: (1) Lucitone 199, (2) IPS Gingiva, and (3) a combination of the 2 shade guide systems. The spectral reflectance values of the center of each gingival shade tab (1.5 mm in diameter) were measured (without a backing) with a spectroradiometer and an external light source at wavelengths from 380 nm to 780 nm at 2-nm intervals. All spectral reflectance measurements were made using 0-degree observer and 45-degree illumination and then converted to CIE values. The attached gingiva of 120 subjects was measured with the same protocol. The CEs of each of the 120 subjects' attached gingiva for each of the 2 shade guide systems and their combination were determined and averaged. The mean minimum CEs were analyzed with repeated measures ANOVA and the post hoc Tukey HSD for multiple comparison (alpha=.05). RESULTS: A significant difference (P<.001) was found among the mean minimum CEs of the 2 gingival shade guide systems and their combination. The Tukey HSD test revealed that the mean minimum CEs for Lucitone 199 (Delta E 10.8 +/-4.4) were significantly different from the IPS Gingiva (Delta E 8.6 +/-3.6) shade guide system. However, the combination of the 2 gingival shade guide systems (Delta E 7.9 +/-3.4) was not significantly different from the IPS Gingiva system, but a significant difference was found among races (P=.016). No interactions were found between the other tested groups. The mean CE for white individuals (Delta E 8.3 +/-2.5) is significantly different and less than the mean CE for African Americans (Delta E 10.0 +/-4.4). The CEs for Asians (Delta E=9.1 +/-4.3) and others (Delta E 9.0 +/-4.4) are not significantly different from CEs for whites or African Americans. CONCLUSIONS: The IPS Gingiva shade guide system resulted in the lowest CEs compared to the Lucitone 199 shade guide system. The mean CE for Lucitone 199 was significantly greater than the mean CE for IPS Gingiva and for the combination of the 2 guides. The mean CE for whites is significantly different and less than the mean CE for African Americans. The CEs for Asians and others are not significantly different from CEs for whites or African Americans.


Assuntos
Cor/normas , Inserção Epitelial/anatomia & histologia , Gengiva/anatomia & histologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Colorimetria/instrumentação , Colorimetria/normas , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Grupos Raciais , Adulto Jovem
3.
J Prosthet Dent ; 97(1): 45-53, 2007 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17280891

RESUMO

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The color of vital craniofacial structures has not been measured accurately. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the color of vital craniofacial structures and evaluate the validity and test-retest reliability of a noncontacting 45/0-degree optical configuration. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A spectroradiometer and an external light source were configured in a noncontacting 45/0-degree (45-degree illumination and 0-degree observer) optical configuration to measure the color of subjects' vital craniofacial structures (central and lateral incisor and canine, attached gingiva, lips, and facial skin). The 120 subjects were stratified into 5 age groups with 4 racial categories and balanced for gender. For evaluation of validity, linear regressions and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for DeltaL( *), Deltaa( *), Deltab( *) [color difference of (CIE) LAB values] between the measured and certified values of the 22 color patches of the DC Color Checker. For test-retest reliability, a random sample of 12 (10%) subjects was remeasured at a second visit. Paired t tests, correlations, and Bland-Altman analyses were performed between the first and second measurements of the 12 pairs of L( *), a( *), and b( *) values for the 6 craniofacial structures. RESULTS: For validity, the mean color difference and linear regression for Commission Internationale d'Eclairage (CIE) LAB values between measured and certified color of the 22 opaque color patches were DeltaE of 1.46 and 0.99 for all regressions, respectively. Only Deltaa( *) did not contain zero in its 95% confidence interval. For test-retest reliability, no paired t tests were significantly different from each other, and the Pearson correlation coefficient ranged from 0.9 (9 pairs) to 0.7 (3 pairs). Ten of the 18 Bland-Altman plots showed good reliability. CONCLUSION: The spectral reflectance of craniofacial structures can be measured with acceptable validity and test-retest reliability using a noncontacting 45/0-degree optical configuration.


Assuntos
Cor/normas , Colorimetria/normas , Prótese Dentária , Prótese Maxilofacial , Pigmentação em Prótese/normas , Colorimetria/instrumentação , Estética Dentária , Face , Gengiva , Humanos , Lábio , Desenho de Prótese/instrumentação , Desenho de Prótese/métodos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Pele
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...