Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Infect Dis ; 202(3): 436-44, 2010 Aug 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20557239

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Persistent human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is the most important risk factor for cervical cancer, and understanding genotype-specific HPV persistence is essential for elucidating the natural history of HPV infections. METHODS: In the Finnish Family HPV Study, 329 pregnant women (mean age, 25.5 years) were recruited during the third trimester of pregnancy and were followed up for 6 years. Multiplex HPV genotyping for 27 low- and high-risk HPV types was used to define genotype-specific prevalence at each visit. Generalized estimating equation models were constructed to estimate predictors of type-specific persistence (positive results at 2 consecutive visits) of species 7 and 9 HPV genotypes. RESULTS: HPV16 was the most common type, followed by HPV types 18, 31, 35, 45, 58, 70, and 6. Prevalence of multiple infections ranged from 21% to 45%. Persistence was most prolonged for HPV types 35, 58, and 52, with durations of 38.7, 32.1, and 24.2 months, respectively, and was equal for multiple-type infections and HPV16, with durations of 21 and 24 months, respectively. Independent predictors of type-specific persistence of species 7 and 9 HPV genotypes were age (odds ratio, 1.13 [95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.25]; P=.017), oral sex (odds ratio, 0.37 [95% confidence interval, 0.17-0.81]; P=.013), and young age (<13 years) at initiation of smoking (odds ratio, 0.51 [95% confidence interval, 0.27-0.98]; P=.046). CONCLUSION: HPV16 was the most frequent persisting HPV genotype followed by multiple infections. Early initiation of smoking, practicing oral sex and older age increase the risk for persistence of species 7 and 9 HPV genotypes.


Assuntos
Papillomaviridae/classificação , Papillomaviridae/genética , Infecções por Papillomavirus/epidemiologia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/virologia , Adulto , Comorbidade , DNA Viral/genética , Feminino , Finlândia/epidemiologia , Genótipo , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Papillomaviridae/isolamento & purificação , Gravidez , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/virologia , Prevalência , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo
2.
Anticancer Res ; 22(2B): 1151-5, 2002.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12168916

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: To compare the toxicity of salvage chemotherapy (CT) given for recurrent or progressive ovarian cancer (OC) after either high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) or conventional CT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: HDC supported by autologous stem cell transplantation was given to ten OC patients. Seven of them were treated with salvage CT for recurrent disease and were included in this study (Group A). Seven patients with recurrent OC treated primarily with conventional CT (Group B) were matched for age (+/- 3 years), stage and histology. The hematological toxicity of treatment was graded according to the WHO criteria. RESULTS: During salvage CT, grade 3-4 neutropenia was seen in nine out of 81 courses (11.1%) in Group A and in six out of 85 courses (7.1%) in Group B (p <0.1). The use of G-CSF was more common in Group A than in Group B, both during first-line and salvage CT. When the mobilisation courses were excluded in Group A, the use of G-CSF was more common during salvage treatment than during primary treatment (27 out of 81 vs. 16 out of 85, p < 0.05). Also, in Group B the use of G-CSF was more common during salvage CT than during primary treatment (10 out of 85 vs. 0 out of 73, p < 0.01). Grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia was seen in nine out of 81 courses (11.1%) in Group A but in none of the 85 courses (0%) in Group B (p<0.05). No platelet transfusion was needed during salvage treatment. The mean interval of courses in salvage CT was 27.7 days (range 19-71) in Group A and 27.5 days (range 18-120) in Group B (p = ns). Overall survival was 40.4 months in Group A and 33.0 months in Group B (p < 0.1). CONCLUSION: Salvage treatment after HDC was well-tolerated when given with G-CSF support. Salvage chemotherapy could be carried out with the same doses and intervals both for patients treated earlier with HDC and conventional CT.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Doenças Hematológicas/induzido quimicamente , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ovarianas/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Terapia Combinada , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Feminino , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/sangue , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Ovarianas/sangue , Neoplasias Ovarianas/patologia , Terapia de Salvação/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...