RESUMO
AIM: A cancer diagnosis is often associated with physical as well as emotional distress. Previous studies indicate a higher risk for suicide in patients diagnosed with cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of death by suicide in a national cohort of patients with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer compared with a matched control group to determine if patients with colorectal cancer had an increased incidence of death by suicide. METHOD: This national Swedish cohort was retrieved from the register-based research database CRCBaSe, which includes all patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer between 1997-2006 (rectal) and 2008-2016 (colon) and six controls for each patient matched by age, sex, and county. Cause specific mortality due to suicide was modelled using Cox proportional hazards model and adjusted for known risk factors. RESULTS: The main analysis included patients operated for colorectal cancer, 55 578 patients compared with 307 888 controls. The first year after diagnosis the hazard ratio (HR) for suicide among patients operated for colorectal cancer was 1.86 (CI: 1.18-2.95) compared to controls. Suicide was more common among men than women (HR 2.08; 1.26-3.42 vs. 1.09; 0.32-3.75). A subgroup analysis of the 9198 patients who did not undergo surgery after diagnoses found a seven-fold increase of suicide (HR 7.03; 3.10-15.91). CONCLUSION: Suicide after surgery for colorectal cancer was almost twice as high as in the control group, mainly driven by excess mortality among men. Although the cases were few in the subgroup of nonoperated patients, the considerably higher risk of suicide indicates that more resources might be needed in this group. Evaluation of risk factors for suicide among patients with colorectal cancer should be performed for early identification of individuals at risk.
RESUMO
In both pain research and clinical practice, patient-reported outcome measures are used to assess dimensions of health. Interpreting these instruments requires understanding their measurement error and what magnitude of change has subjective importance for patients. This study estimated the standard error of measurement, 1-year minimal detectable change, and 1-year minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the Short Form-36 Health Survey physical component summary and mental component summary, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale subscales for anxiety symptoms and depression symptoms, and the numeric rating scale for past-week average pain intensity. MCIDs for these instruments have not previously been estimated in a large sample of chronic pain patients participating in interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation. Data were drawn from the Swedish Quality Registry for Pain Rehabilitation (n = 8,854 patients). MCID was estimated as average change and change difference based on 3 different anchors. MCID estimates were 2.62 to 4.69 for Short Form-36 Health Survey physical component summary, 4.46 to 6.79 for Short Form-36 Health Survey mental component summary, .895 to 1.48 for numeric rating scale, 1.17 to 2.13 for anxiety symptoms in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and 1.48 to 2.54 for depression symptoms in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. The common assumption of an identical standard error of measurement for pre- and post-treatment measurements was not always applicable. When estimating MCID, researchers should select an estimation method and anchor aligned with the study's context and objectives. PERSPECTIVE: This article presents estimates of MCID and minimal detectable change for several commonly used patient-reported outcome measures among patients with chronic pain. These estimates can help clinicians and researchers to determine when a measured health improvement is subjectively important to the patient and greater than measurement error.
