Improved microbial and sensory quality of chicken meat by treatment with lactic acid, organic acid salts and modified atmosphere packaging.

Microbial contamination and growth play important roles in spoilage and quality loss of raw poultry products. We evaluated the suitability of three commercially available organic acid based antimicrobial compounds, Purac FCC80 (l-lactic acid), Verdad N6 (buffered vinegar fermentate) and Provian K (blend of potassium acetate and diacetate) to prevent growth of the innate microbiota, reduce spoilage and enhance the sensory quality of raw chicken under vacuum, high CO2 (60/40% CO2/N2), and high O2 (75/25% O2/CO2) modified atmosphere (MA) storage conditions. Solutions were applied warm (50 °C) or cold (4 °C) to reflect treatments prior to (Prechill) or after (Postchill) cooling of chicken carcasses, respectively. Single postchill treatments of raw chicken wings with 5% Verdad N6 or Provian K solutions and MA storage enabled complete growth inhibition during the first seven days of storage before growth resumed. Enhanced bacterial control was obtained by combining Prechill lactic acid and Postchill Verdad N6 or Provian K treatments which indicated initial reductions up to 1.1 log and where total bacterial increase after 20 days storage was limited to 1.8-2.1 log. Antibacterial effects were dependent on the concentration of the inhibiting salts used, pH and the storage conditions. Bacterial community analyses showed increased relative levels of Gram-positive bacteria and with reductions of potential spoilage organisms in samples treated with the organic acid salts Verdad N6 and Provian K. Sensory analyses of raw, treated wings showed prominent lower scores in several spoilage associated odour attributes when compared with untreated chicken wings after 13 days storage. For heat-treated chicken, only minor differences for 22 tested attributes were detected between seven antimicrobial treatments and untreated control chicken. Immersion in commercially available organic acid/salt solutions combined with MA storage can reduce bacterial levels, improve microbial and sensory quality, and potentially improve shelf life and reduce food waste of chicken products.

Cooking chicken at home: Common or recommended approaches to judge doneness may not assure sufficient inactivation of pathogens.

About one third of foodborne illness outbreaks in Europe are acquired in the home and eating undercooked poultry is among consumption practices associated with illness. The aim of this study was to investigate whether actual and recommended practices for monitoring chicken doneness are safe. Seventy-five European households from five European countries were interviewed and videoed while cooking chicken in their private kitchens, including young single men, families with infants/in pregnancy and elderly over seventy years. A cross-national web-survey collected cooking practices for chicken from 3969 households. In a laboratory kitchen, chicken breast fillets were injected with cocktails of Salmonella and Campylobacter and cooked to core temperatures between 55 and 70°C. Microbial survival in the core and surface of the meat were determined. In a parallel experiment, core colour, colour of juice and texture were recorded. Finally, a range of cooking thermometers from the consumer market were evaluated. The field study identified nine practical approaches for deciding if the chicken was properly cooked. Among these, checking the colour of the meat was commonly used and perceived as a way of mitigating risks among the consumers. Meanwhile, chicken was perceived as hedonically vulnerable to long cooking time. The quantitative survey revealed that households prevalently check cooking status from the inside colour (49.6%) and/or inside texture (39.2%) of the meat. Young men rely more often on the outside colour of the meat (34.7%) and less often on the juices (16.5%) than the elderly (>65 years old; 25.8% and 24.6%, respectively). The lab study showed that colour change of chicken meat happened below 60°C, corresponding to less than 3 log reduction of Salmonella and Campylobacter. At a core temperature of 70°C, pathogens survived on the fillet surface not in contact with the frying pan. No correlation between meat texture and microbial inactivation was found. A minority of respondents used a food thermometer, and a challenge with cooking thermometers for home use was long response time. In conclusion, the recommendations from the authorities on monitoring doneness of chicken and current consumer practices do not ensure reduction of pathogens to safe levels. For the domestic cook, determining doneness is both a question of avoiding potential harm and achieving a pleasurable meal. It is discussed how lack of an easy "rule-of-thumb" or tools to check safe cooking at consumer level, as well as national differences in contamination levels, food culture and economy make it difficult to develop international recommendations that are both safe and easily implemented.