Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Methods Enzymol ; 463: 285-303, 2009.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19892178

RESUMO

There are a variety of reliable methods for cellular disintegration and extraction of proteins ranging from enzymatic digestion and osmotic shock to ultrasonication, and pressure disruption. Each method has inherent advantages and disadvantages. Generally vigorous mechanical treatments reduce extract viscosity but can result in the inactivation of labile proteins by heat or oxidation, while gentle treatments may not release the target protein from the cells, and resulting extracts are extremely viscous. Depending on the cell type selected as the source for target protein expression, cellular extracts contain large amounts of nucleic acid, ribosomal material, lipids, dispersed cell wall polysaccharide, carbohydrates, chitin, small molecules, and thousands of unwanted proteins. Isolation and recovery of a single protein from this complex mixture of macromolecules presents considerable challenges. The first and possibly most important of these challenges is generation of a cellular extract that can be efficiently manipulated in downstream processes without inactivation or degradation of labile protein targets. Cell disruption techniques must rapidly and efficiently lyse cells to extract proteins with minimal proteolysis or oxidation while reducing extract viscosity caused by cell debris and genomic DNA contamination. Advanced bioprocessing equipment and reagents have been developed over the past twenty years to complement established disruption procedures and accomplish these tasks with even greater success. This chapter will summarize these advances and describe detailed protocols for some of the most popular methods for protein extraction.


Assuntos
Bioquímica/tendências , Extratos Celulares/química , Fracionamento Celular/métodos , Proteínas/isolamento & purificação , Animais , Técnicas Bacteriológicas , Bioquímica/métodos , Fenômenos Biomecânicos/fisiologia , Fracionamento Celular/tendências , Fracionamento Químico/métodos , Escherichia coli/química , Escherichia coli/citologia , Humanos , Indicadores e Reagentes/química , Indicadores e Reagentes/provisão & distribuição
2.
J Struct Funct Genomics ; 6(2-3): 189-94, 2005.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16211518

RESUMO

A fundamental challenge in high-throughput (HT) expression screening is to rapidly identify the appropriate expression system for many targets in parallel. Known or unknown open reading frames (ORFs) are typically amplified by PCR and then cloned into a variety of vectors, producing recombinants used to direct target protein expression in Escherichia coli, insect cells, mammalian cells, or yeast. To facilitate rapid expression and purification in Spodoptera insect cells (Sf9), we developed transient expression vectors that include an enterokinase cleavage site immediately upstream of a ligation-independent cloning site (Ek/LIC). We also developed a high-efficiency insect cell transfection reagent, and automation-compatible fusion protein purification system for insect cells to facilitate expression screening and protein production. Positive clones identified from the small-scale screening were subjected to a larger scale production. Using this InsectDirect approach, we successfully expressed milligram quantities of different human proteins including heat shock proteins, phospholipases, and protein kinases.


Assuntos
Proteínas/isolamento & purificação , Proteômica/métodos , Spodoptera/citologia , Transfecção/métodos , Animais , Clonagem Molecular/métodos , Vetores Genéticos/genética , Humanos , Fases de Leitura Aberta/genética , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase , Proteínas/metabolismo , Spodoptera/metabolismo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...