Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int Ophthalmol ; 34(3): 557-61, 2014 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24081914

RESUMO

The aim of this study is to assess the ability of non-ophthalmologist doctors to detect eyes with occludable angles using the flashlight test (FLT). For this study, a total of 45 patients were prospectively enrolled. After an ophthalmological examination all patients underwent FLT by two non-ophthalmologist examiners in a masked and standardized fashion. Two gynecologists were chosen, as they often deal with patients exposed to drugs that can trigger pupillary block. An occludable angle was defined as ≥2 quadrants in which the posterior trabecular meshwork was not visible by gonioscopy without indentation (performed by an experienced glaucoma specialist). Whenever both eyes were eligible, one was randomly selected for analysis. Sensitivity and specificity for detection of occludable angles were generated, and the agreement between examiners was assessed. This study results showed that the mean age was 47.1 ± 16.4 years and most patients were female (67.7 %). There was a good agreement between observers for FLT results (κ = 0.77; p = 0.04). Similar values of sensitivity and specificity were found for both examiners (92 and 67 % vs 97 and 67 %, respectively). Based on the findings of this study, it was concluded that FLT showed good sensitivity for detection of eyes with occludable angles. The fact that it can be easily and reliably performed by non-ophthalmologist highlights its use as a screening tool in patients requiring medications that can induce angle closure.


Assuntos
Competência Clínica/estatística & dados numéricos , Glaucoma/diagnóstico , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Testes Visuais/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Câmara Anterior/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Estudos Prospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Adulto Jovem
2.
Am J Infect Control ; 37(10): 858-60, 2009 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19608297

RESUMO

Risk perception of acquiring vaccine preventable diseases and the immune status of 187 health care workers (HCW) from a high-complexity university hospital in São Paulo, Brazil, were assessed. The vaccine preventable diseases more cited as at risk for acquisition were hepatitis B (94.1%), influenza (92.5%), meningococcal disease (90.3%), tuberculosis (85.0%), and varicella (72.7%). Previous disease or vaccination reported by HCW were hepatitis B (82.4%), tetanus (87.7%), diphtheria (81.8%), measles (86.6%), mumps (85.6%), rubella (85.0%), varicella (82.9%), and influenza (35.8%). One third of HCW reported previous percutaneous or mucosal occupational accidents, and 83.6% had notified the event to the Hospital Infection Control Committee. Despite good risk perception of acquiring vaccine preventable diseases, only 35.8% of individuals were fully immunized. Efforts should be made to increase influenza vaccination coverage among all professionals and to reduce the number of nonreported accidents, especially among physicians.


Assuntos
Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Pessoal de Saúde , Comportamento de Redução do Risco , Vacinação/psicologia , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Vacinas/imunologia , Adulto , Brasil , Transmissão de Doença Infecciosa/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Hospitais Universitários , Humanos , Masculino , Doenças Profissionais/prevenção & controle
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...