Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
Orthopedics ; 46(5): 285-290, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36853950

RESUMO

Tranexamic acid (TXA) has been shown to decrease blood loss and transfusion rates across a variety of routes of administration and doses in the setting of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Oral TXA is less studied but has decreased cost and increased ease of administration. This prospective, randomized study compared the efficacy and cost of three routes of TXA administration in the setting of primary TKA. Primary outcomes were 24-hour hemoglobin loss, calculated blood loss, and blood transfusion rate. One-way analysis of variance, Pearson's chi-square test, and Fisher's exact test were used for statistical analysis. One hundred eleven patients were enrolled. The mean 24-hour hemoglobin loss for the intravenous (IV), oral, and topical TXA groups was 2.50±0.95 g/dL, 2.64±0.94 g/dL, and 2.52±0.90 g/dL, respectively, with no clinical or statistically significant differences among the groups (P=.79). Calculated blood loss was not significantly different (P=.61) among the IV TXA (1067±371 mL), oral TXA (1127±455 mL), and topical TXA (1027±454 mL) groups. No patients in any treatment group required a blood transfusion. IV, oral, and topical routes of TXA administration offer similar clinical benefits for perioperative bleeding and blood transfusion rate in TKA. Oral TXA provides a cost-benefit relative to the other routes of administration ($14 vs $114 per patient), making it a more cost-effective choice. Oral TXA has additional logistical challenges compared with other routes of administration due to increased absorption time, which may impact its use in clinical practice. [Orthopedics. 2023;46(5):285-290.].


Assuntos
Antifibrinolíticos , Artroplastia do Joelho , Ácido Tranexâmico , Humanos , Artroplastia do Joelho/efeitos adversos , Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Administração Intravenosa , Administração Tópica , Hemoglobinas
3.
Arthroplast Today ; 13: 181-187, 2022 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35118181

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is a significant problem in total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Although risk factors for POUR have been well documented, they are ubiquitous in an aging total joint population, which makes risk stratification difficult. The purpose of this study was to determine if a high preoperative post-void bladder scan identifies patients at risk for POUR. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on all TJAs performed at a high-volume orthopedic center between December 2019 and February 2020. A total of 585 elective TJA patients received post-void bladder scans before surgery. Bladder scan volumes were correlated with catheterization via Chi-squared tests. RESULTS: A high post-void residual volume (PVRV > 50 ml) was associated with an increased risk of catheterization (23% vs 34%, chi-squared statistic = 6.2638, P value = .013), as was intravenous fluid volume (>1000 ml in knee, >2000 ml in hip). Catheterization rates were higher among total knee arthroplasty patients younger than 60 years (37% vs 24%, chi-squared statistic = 4.284, P value = .0385) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients older than 65 years (30% vs 18%, chi-squared statistic = 3.292, P value = .0695). Multiple risk factors were additive. CONCLUSIONS: Higher PVRV and intravenous fluids were independently associated with catheterization after TJA. Younger age was associated with greater risk in total knee arthroplasty, while older age increased risk in THA. We propose that a preoperative bladder scan to detect a high PVRV may provide clinical utility to identify patients likely to develop POUR.

5.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) ; 68(11): 1631-1639, 2016 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26881821

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To define a minimum Standard Set of outcome measures and case-mix factors for monitoring, comparing, and improving health care for patients with clinically diagnosed hip or knee osteoarthritis (OA), with a focus on defining the outcomes that matter most to patients. METHODS: An international working group of patients, arthroplasty register experts, orthopedic surgeons, primary care physicians, rheumatologists, and physiotherapists representing 10 countries was assembled to review existing literature and practices for assessing outcomes of pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic OA therapies, including surgery. A series of 8 teleconferences, incorporating a modified Delphi process, were held to reach consensus. RESULTS: The working group reached consensus on a concise set of outcome measures to evaluate patients' joint pain, physical functioning, health-related quality of life, work status, mortality, reoperations, readmissions, and overall satisfaction with treatment result. To support analysis of these outcome measures, pertinent baseline characteristics and risk factor metrics were defined. Annual outcome measurement is recommended for all patients. CONCLUSION: We have defined a Standard Set of outcome measures for monitoring the care of people with clinically diagnosed hip or knee OA that is appropriate for use across all treatment and care settings. We believe this Standard Set provides meaningful, comparable, and easy to interpret measures ready to implement in clinics and/or registries globally. We view this set as an initial step that, when combined with cost data, will facilitate value-based health care improvements in the treatment of hip and knee OA.


Assuntos
Consenso , Gerenciamento Clínico , Osteoartrite do Quadril/terapia , Osteoartrite do Joelho/terapia , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/normas , Humanos , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento
6.
J Bone Joint Surg Am ; 96(16): 1327-32, 2014 Aug 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25143492

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing total hip or total knee arthroplasty have risks that include venous thromboembolism. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons has promulgated guidelines for the preoperative assessment of patients with the primary objective of preventing pulmonary embolism. We aimed to evaluate and establish the utility of the first-generation American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons guidelines for the prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty at a single institution. METHODS: A prospective analysis of 3289 consecutive patients managed with total hip or total knee arthroplasty at the Connecticut Joint Replacement Institute between June 1, 2009, and April 30, 2011, was conducted. Data on age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, and a personal or family history of blood clots requiring long-term warfarin use were analyzed, as were data on a personal history of a malignant tumor, a bleeding disorder, gastrointestinal bleeding, or a hemorrhagic cerebrovascular accident. All patients were managed prophylactically with a specific algorithm based on the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons guidelines. All of the patients were mobilized on postoperative day one, and pneumatic foot-pump compression was used for the duration of the hospitalization. RESULTS: Thirty-six major venous thromboembolic events were documented with Doppler ultrasound or computed tomography angiography, for a ninety-day incidence of 1.1% (95% confidence interval, 0.8% to 1.5%). A personal history of blood clots was significantly associated with a blood clot in the proximal part of the thigh or a pulmonary embolism, but a family history of blood clots and a personal history of a malignant tumor did not show a significant relationship with venous thromboembolism. The ninety-day incidence of venous thromboembolism was significantly different between total hip arthroplasty patients (0.56%; 95% confidence interval, 0.30% to 1.15%) and total knee arthroplasty patients (1.46%; 95% confidence interval, 1.01% to 2.10%). The risk was greater in high-risk total knee arthroplasty patients compared with high-risk total hip arthroplasty patients despite comparable prophylaxis with enoxaparin sodium for twenty-eight days. CONCLUSIONS: The prospective use of the first-generation American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons guidelines resulted in a low incidence of clinically important thromboembolic events in total hip and total knee arthroplasty patients. When properly used in these patients, the guidelines to minimize adverse outcomes are executable and effective. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Assuntos
Artroplastia de Quadril/efeitos adversos , Artroplastia do Joelho/efeitos adversos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Tromboembolia Venosa/prevenção & controle , Idoso , Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Meias de Compressão , Varfarina/uso terapêutico
7.
J Bone Joint Surg Am ; 95(21): 1935-41, 2013 Nov 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24196463

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We studied the efficacy of local infiltration analgesia in surgical wounds with 0.2% ropivacaine (50 mL), ketorolac (15 mg), and adrenaline (0.5 mg) compared with that of local infiltration analgesia combined with continuous infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine as a method of pain control after total hip arthroplasty. We hypothesized that as a component of multimodal analgesia, local infiltration analgesia followed by continuous infusion of ropivacaine would result in reduced postoperative opioid consumption and lower pain scores compared with infiltration alone, and that both of these techniques would be superior to placebo. METHODS: In this prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 105 patients were randomized into three groups: Group I, in which patients received infiltration with ropivacaine, ketorolac, and adrenaline followed by continuous infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine at 5 mL/hr; Group II, in which patients received infiltration with ropivacaine, ketorolac, and adrenaline followed by continuous infusion of saline solution at 5 mL/hr; and Group III, in which patients received infiltration with saline solution followed by continuous infusion of saline solution at 5 mL/hr.All patients received celecoxib, pregabalin, and acetaminophen perioperatively and patient-controlled analgesia; surgery was performed under general anesthesia. Before wound closure, the tissues and periarticular space were infiltrated with ropivacaine, ketorolac, and adrenaline or saline solution and a fenestrated catheter was placed. The catheter was attached to a pump prefilled with either 0.2% ropivacaine or saline solution set to infuse at 5 mL/hr.The primary outcome measure was postoperative opioid consumption and the secondary outcome measures were pain scores, adverse side effects, and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: There were no differences between groups in the administration of opioids in the operating room, in the recovery room, or on the surgical floor. The pain scores on recovery room admission and discharge and the floor were low and similar between groups. There were no differences in the incidence of adverse side effects among groups. Patient satisfaction with pain management was similar in all groups. CONCLUSIONS: Local infiltration analgesia alone or followed by continuous infusion of ropivacaine as part of multimodal analgesia provides no additional analgesic benefit or reduction in opioid consumption compared with placebo following total hip arthroplasty. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Assuntos
Analgesia/métodos , Anestesia Local/métodos , Anestésicos Locais/uso terapêutico , Artroplastia de Quadril/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Amidas/administração & dosagem , Amidas/uso terapêutico , Analgesia Controlada pelo Paciente/métodos , Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Método Duplo-Cego , Vias de Administração de Medicamentos , Epinefrina/administração & dosagem , Epinefrina/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Cetorolaco/administração & dosagem , Cetorolaco/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Manejo da Dor , Medição da Dor , Ropivacaina
8.
Am J Sports Med ; 30(4): 469-73, 2002.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12130398

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Ruptures of the patellar tendon are rare injuries. Surgical treatment for this injury is mandatory. HYPOTHESIS: Gap formation does not differ between the three patellar tendon repair techniques. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Twelve fresh-frozen cadaveric knees were used to compare three techniques of patellar tendon repairs. The standard suture repair used two Krackow sutures placed in the avulsed patellar tendon, passed through transpatellar drill holes, and secured with the knee in 30 degrees of flexion. In the second group, suture repair was augmented with a No. 5 Ethibond suture. In the third group, suture repair was augmented with a 2.0 Dall-Miles cable. Testing was performed with the specimens mounted to a custom knee jig with the tibia free, simulating the knee moment of a 70-kg person. Each knee was then cycled 250 times at 0.25 Hz. RESULTS: Gap formation across the standard suture repair averaged 7.3 mm; across the suture augmentation and cable augmentation groups it averaged 4.9 mm and 3.5 mm, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Augmentation of patellar tendon avulsions can decrease gap formation at the repair site, allowing early mobilization. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Gap formation seen in repair without augmentation could lead to clinical failure with resultant patella alta and extensor mechanism lag.


Assuntos
Traumatismos do Joelho/cirurgia , Técnicas de Sutura , Traumatismos dos Tendões/fisiopatologia , Traumatismos dos Tendões/cirurgia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Fenômenos Biomecânicos , Cadáver , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ruptura
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...