Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Vaccine ; 34(39): 4718-4723, 2016 09 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27527819

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Rotavirus infection is a leading cause of gastroenteritis in infants and children globally. Reductions in rotavirus activity have been observed following introduction of rotavirus vaccination programmes, however a reductions have also been reported in some unvaccinated countries. The Island of Ireland incorporates the two jurisdictions Northern Ireland (NI) and the Republic of Ireland (IE). Both have similarities in climate, demography, morbidity and mortality but distinct health administrations and vaccination policies. Rotarix was added to the childhood immunisation programme in NI on the 1 July 2013. IE have not introduced routine rotavirus vaccination to date. The aim of this population based ecological study was to evaluate the impact of the rotavirus vaccine on burden of rotavirus disease in NI, and to compare with IE as an unvaccinated control population. This will help determine if the changes seen were due to the rotavirus vaccine, or due to confounding factors. METHODS: A number of population based measures of disease burden were compared in both jurisdictions pre-vaccine (six years; 2007/08-2012/13) and post-vaccine (two years; 2013/14-2014/15). The data sources included national rotavirus surveillance data based on laboratory reports/notifications; hospital admission data; and notifications of gastroenteritis in under 2year olds. RESULTS: In the post-vaccination period, rotavirus incidence in NI dropped by 54% while in IE it increased by 19% compared to the pre-vaccine period. Notifications of gastroenteritis in under 2s in NI declined by 53% and hospital admissions in under 5year olds in NI declined by 40% in the post vaccine period. CONCLUSIONS: This natural experiment demonstrated a significant reduction in rotavirus disease activity post-vaccine introduction in NI with associated reductions in healthcare utilisation, with a concurrent increase in rotavirus disease activity in the non-vaccinated population in IE. These findings support rotavirus vaccination as an effective measure to reduce childhood morbidity.


Assuntos
Estudos Epidemiológicos , Gastroenterite/epidemiologia , Programas de Imunização , Infecções por Rotavirus/epidemiologia , Pré-Escolar , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Gastroenterite/prevenção & controle , Política de Saúde , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Lactente , Irlanda , Vigilância em Saúde Pública , Infecções por Rotavirus/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra Rotavirus/uso terapêutico , Cobertura Vacinal/estatística & dados numéricos , Vacinas Atenuadas/uso terapêutico
2.
BMJ Open ; 5(9): e008266, 2015 Sep 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26353870

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To identify the reasons why some people do not participate in bowel cancer screening so that steps can be taken to improve informed decision-making. DESIGN: Qualitative study, using focus groups with thematic analysis of data to identify, analyse and report patterns. Transcripts were repeatedly read and inductively coded using a phenomenological perspective, and organised into key themes. SETTING: Belfast and Armagh, two areas of Northern Ireland with relatively low uptake of bowel cancer screening. PARTICIPANTS: Ten women and 18 men in three single-gender focus groups (two male and one female), each with 9-10 participants. Study participants were recruited by convenience sampling from the general public and were eligible for, but had not taken part in, the Northern Ireland Bowel Cancer Screening Programme. RESULTS: Key themes identified were fear of cancer; the test procedure; social norms; past experience of cancer and screening; lack of knowledge or understanding about bowel cancer screening; and resulting behaviour towards the test. Fear about receiving bad news and reluctance to conduct the test themselves were reactions that participants seemed willing to overcome after taking part in open discussion about the test. CONCLUSIONS: We identified barriers to participation in bowel cancer screening and used these insights to develop new materials to support delivery of the programme. Some of the issues raised have been identified in other UK settings, suggesting that knowledge about barriers, and strategies to improve uptake, may be generalisable.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais/psicologia , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/psicologia , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/psicologia , Participação do Paciente/psicologia , Idoso , Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Grupos Focais , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Programas de Rastreamento , Motivação , Irlanda do Norte/epidemiologia , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Participação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Fatores Socioeconômicos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...