How do we stand? Variations during repeated standing phases of asymptomatic subjects and low back pain patients.

An irreproducible standing posture can lead to mis-interpretation of radiological measurements, wrong diagnoses and possibly unnecessary treatment. This study aimed to evaluate the differences in lumbar lordosis and sacrum orientation in six repetitive upright standing postures of 353 asymptomatic subjects (including 332 non-athletes and 21 athletes - soccer players) and 83 low back pain (LBP) patients using a non-invasive back-shape measurement device. In the standing position, all investigated cohorts displayed a large inter-subject variability in sacrum orientation (∼40°) and lumbar lordosis (∼53°). In the asymptomatic cohort (non-athletes), 51% of the subjects showed variations in lumbar lordosis of 10-20% in six repeated standing phases and 29% showed variations of even more than 20%. In the sacrum orientation, 53% of all asymptomatic subjects revealed variations of >20% and 31% of even more than 30%. It can be concluded that standing is highly individual and poorly reproducible. The reproducibility was independent of age, gender, body height and weight. LBP patients and athletes showed a similar variability as the asymptomatic cohort. The number of standing phases performed showed no positive effect on the reproducibility. Therefore, the variability in standing is not predictable but random, and thus does not reflect an individual specific behavioral pattern which can be reduced, for example, by repeated standing phases.

Separate the Sheep from the Goats: Use and Limitations of Large Animal Models in Intervertebral Disc Research.

Approximately 5,168 large animals (pigs, sheep, goats, and cattle) were used for intervertebral disc research in identified studies published between 1985 and 2016. Most of the reviewed studies revealed a low scientific impact, a lack of sound justifications for the animal models, and a number of deficiencies in the documentation of the animal experimentation. The scientific community should take suitable measures to investigate the presumption that animal models have translational value in intervertebral disc research. Recommendations for future investigations are provided to improve the quality, validity, and usefulness of animal studies for intervertebral disc research. More in vivo studies are warranted to comprehensively evaluate the suitability of animal models in various applications and help place animal models as an integral, complementary part of intervertebral disc research.

Review of the fluid flow within intervertebral discs - How could in vitro measurements replicate in vivo?

By maintaining a balance between external mechanical loads and internal osmotic pressure, fluid content of intervertebral discs constantly alters causing fluctuations in disc hydration, height, diameter and pressure that govern disc temporal response. This paper reviews and discusses the relevant findings of earlier studies on the disc fluid flow with the aim to understand and remedy discrepancies between in vivo and in vitro observations. New results of finite element model studies are also exploited in order to help identify the likely causes for such differences and underlying mechanisms observed in vitro. In vivo measurements of changes in spinal height and disc fluid content/pressure via stadiometry, magnetic resonance imaging and intradiscal pressure measurements have been carried out. They have demonstrated that the disc volume, fluid content, height and nucleus pressure alter depending to a large extent on prior-current external load conditions. Although the diurnal loading lasts on average nearly twice longer than the subsequent resting (16 vs. 8h), the disc completely recovers its height and volume during the latter period through fluid inflow. In view of much longer periods required to recover disc height and pressure in vitro in ovine, porcine, caprine, bovine and rat discs, concerns have been raised on the fluid inflow through the endplates that might be hampered by clogged blood vessels post mortem. Analyses of discrepancies in the flow-dependent recoveries in vivo and in vitro highlight an excessive fluid content in the latter as a likely cause. To replicate in vivo conditions as closely as possible in vitro, preparation and preconditioning of specimens and/or pressure and osmolarity of the culture media in which specimens are immersed should hence be designed in a manner as to diminish disc hydration level and/or fluid transport.

In vivo loads on a vertebral body replacement during different lifting techniques.

The repeated lifting of heavy weights has been identified as a risk factor for low back pain (LBP). Whether squat lifting leads to lower spinal loads than stoop lifting and whether lifting a weight laterally results in smaller forces than lifting the same weight in front of the body remain matters of debate. Instrumented vertebral body replacements (VBRs) were used to measure the in vivo load in the lumbar spine in three patients at level L1 and in one patient at level L3. Stoop lifting and squat lifting were compared in 17 measuring sessions, in which both techniques were performed a total of 104 times. The trunk inclination and amount of knee bending were simultaneously estimated from recorded images. Compared with the aforementioned lifting tasks, the patients additionally lifted a weight laterally with one hand 26 times. Only a small difference (4%) in the measured resultant force was observed between stoop lifting and squat lifting, although the knee-bending angle (stoop 10°, squat 45°) and trunk inclination (stoop 52°, squat 39°) differed considerably at the time points of maximal resultant forces. Lifting a weight laterally caused 14% less implant force on average than lifting the same weight in front of the body. The current in vivo biomechanical study does not provide evidence that spinal loads differ substantially between stoop and squat lifting. The anterior-posterior position of the lifted weight relative to the spine appears to be crucial for spinal loading.

In vivo implant forces acting on a vertebral body replacement during upper body flexion.

Knowledge about in vivo spinal loads is required for the identification of risk factors for low back pain and for realistic preclinical testing of spinal implants. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to measure the in vivo forces on a vertebral body replacement (VBR) during trunk flexion and to analyze in detail the typical relationship between trunk inclination and spinal load. Telemeterized VBRs were implanted in five patients. In vivo loads were measured 135 times during flexion while standing or sitting. The trunk inclination was simultaneously recorded. To reveal elementary differences between flexion while standing and sitting, the force increases at the maximal inclination, as compared to the upright position, were also determined. Approximately 90% of all standing trials showed a characteristic inclination-load relationship, with an initial increase of the resultant force followed by a plateau or even a decrease of the force at an inclination of approximately 33°. Further flexion to the average maximal inclination angle of 53° only marginally affected the implant loads (~450N). Maximal forces were measured during the return to the initial standing position (~565N). Flexion during standing led to a greater force increase (~330N) than during sitting (~200N) when compared to the respective upright positions. The force plateau at greater inclination angles might be explained by abdominal load support, complex stabilization of active and passive spinal structures or intricate load sharing within the implant complex. The data presented here aid in understanding the loads acting on an instrumented lumbar spine.

Spinal loads during post-operative physiotherapeutic exercises.

After spinal surgery, physiotherapeutic exercises are performed to achieve a rapid return to normal life. One important aim of treatment is to regain muscle strength, but it is known that muscle forces increase the spinal loads to potentially hazardous levels. It has not yet been clarified which exercises cause high spinal forces and thus endanger the surgical outcome. The loads on vertebral body replacements were measured in 5 patients during eleven physiotherapeutic exercises, performed in the supine, prone, or lateral position or on all fours (kneeling on the hands and knees). Low resultant forces on the vertebral body replacement were measured for the following exercises: lifting one straight leg in the supine position, abduction of the leg in the lateral position, outstretching one leg in the all-fours position, and hollowing the back in the all-fours position. From the biomechanical point of view, these exercises can be performed shortly after surgery. Implant forces similar or even greater than those for walking were measured during: lifting both legs, lifting the pelvis in the supine position, outstretching one arm with or without simultaneously outstretching the contralateral leg in the all-fours position, and arching the back in the all-fours position. These exercises should not be performed shortly after spine surgery.

Activities of everyday life with high spinal loads.

Activities with high spinal loads should be avoided by patients with back problems. Awareness about these activities and knowledge of the associated loads are important for the proper design and pre-clinical testing of spinal implants. The loads on an instrumented vertebral body replacement have been telemetrically measured for approximately 1000 combinations of activities and parameters in 5 patients over a period up to 65 months postoperatively. A database containing, among others, extreme values for load components in more than 13,500 datasets was searched for 10 activities that cause the highest resultant force, bending moment, torsional moment, or shear force in an anatomical direction. The following activities caused high resultant forces: lifting a weight from the ground, forward elevation of straight arms with a weight in hands, moving a weight laterally in front of the body with hanging arms, changing the body position, staircase walking, tying shoes, and upper body flexion. All activities have in common that the center of mass of the upper body was moved anteriorly. Forces up to 1650 N were measured for these activities of daily life. However, there was a large intra- and inter-individual variation in the implant loads for the various activities depending on how exercises were performed. Measured shear forces were usually higher in the posterior direction than in the anterior direction. Activities with high resultant forces usually caused high values of other load components.

Spinal loads during cycling on an ergometer.

Cycling on an ergometer is an effective exercise for improving fitness. However, people with back problems or previous spinal surgery are often not aware of whether cycling could be harmful for them. To date, little information exists about spinal loads during cycling. A telemeterized vertebral body replacement allows in vivo measurement of implant loads during the activities of daily living. Five patients with a severe compression fracture of a lumbar vertebral body received these implants. During one measurement session, four of the participants exercised on a bicycle ergometer at various power levels. As the power level increased, the maximum resultant force and the difference between the maximum and minimum force (force range) during each pedal revolution increased. The average maximum-force increases between the two power levels 25 and 85 W were 73, 84, 225 and 75 N for the four patients. The corresponding increases in the force range during a pedal revolution were 84, 98, 166 and 101 N. There were large variations in the measured forces between the patients and also within the same patient, especially for high power levels. In two patients, the maximum forces during high-power cycling were higher than the forces during walking measured on the same day. Therefore, the authors conclude that patients with back problems should not cycle at high power levels shortly after surgery as a precaution.

Standardized loads acting in knee implants.

The loads acting in knee joints must be known for improving joint replacement, surgical procedures, physiotherapy, biomechanical computer simulations, and to advise patients with osteoarthritis or fractures about what activities to avoid. Such data would also allow verification of test standards for knee implants. This work analyzes data from 8 subjects with instrumented knee implants, which allowed measuring the contact forces and moments acting in the joint. The implants were powered inductively and the loads transmitted at radio frequency. The time courses of forces and moments during walking, stair climbing, and 6 more activities were averaged for subjects with I) average body weight and average load levels and II) high body weight and high load levels. During all investigated activities except jogging, the high force levels reached 3,372-4,218N. During slow jogging, they were up to 5,165N. The peak torque around the implant stem during walking was 10.5 Nm, which was higher than during all other activities including jogging. The transverse forces and the moments varied greatly between the subjects, especially during non-cyclic activities. The high load levels measured were mostly above those defined in the wear test ISO 14243. The loads defined in the ISO test standard should be adapted to the levels reported here. The new data will allow realistic investigations and improvements of joint replacement, surgical procedures for tendon repair, treatment of fractures, and others. Computer models of the load conditions in the lower extremities will become more realistic if the new data is used as a gold standard. However, due to the extreme individual variations of some load components, even the reported average load profiles can most likely not explain every failure of an implant or a surgical procedure.

Friction in total hip joint prosthesis measured in vivo during walking.

Friction-induced moments and subsequent cup loosening can be the reason for total hip joint replacement failure. The aim of this study was to measure the in vivo contact forces and friction moments during walking. Instrumented hip implants with Al2O3 ceramic head and an XPE inlay were used. In vivo measurements were taken 3 months post operatively in 8 subjects. The coefficient of friction was calculated in 3D throughout the whole gait cycle, and average values of the friction-induced power dissipation in the joint were determined. On average, peak contact forces of 248% of the bodyweight and peak friction moments of 0.26% bodyweight times meter were determined. However, contact forces and friction moments varied greatly between individuals. The friction moment increased during the extension phase of the joint. The average coefficient of friction also increased during this period, from 0.04 (0.03 to 0.06) at contralateral toe off to 0.06 (0.04 to 0.08) at contralateral heel strike. During the flexion phase, the coefficient of friction increased further to 0.14 (0.09 to 0.23) at toe off. The average friction-induced power throughout the whole gait cycle was 2.3 W (1.4 W to 3.8 W). Although more parameters than only the synovia determine the friction, the wide ranges of friction coefficients and power dissipation indicate that the lubricating properties of synovia are individually very different. However, such differences may also exist in natural joints and may influence the progression of arthrosis. Furthermore, subjects with very high power dissipation may be at risk of thermally induced implant loosening. The large increase of the friction coefficient during each step could be caused by the synovia being squeezed out under load.

In vivo hip joint loading during post-operative physiotherapeutic exercises.

INTRODUCTION: After hip surgery, it is the orthopedist's decision to allow full weight bearing to prevent complications or to prescribe partial weight bearing for bone ingrowth or fracture consolidation. While most loading conditions in the hip joint during activities of daily living are known, it remains unclear how demanding physiotherapeutic exercises are. Recommendations for clinical rehabilitation have been established, but these guidelines vary and have not been scientifically confirmed. The aim of this study was to provide a basis for practical recommendations by determining the hip joint contact forces and moments that act during physiotherapeutic activities. METHODS: Joint contact loads were telemetrically measured in 6 patients using instrumented hip endoprostheses. The resultant hip contact force, the torque around the implant stem, and the bending moment in the neck were determined for 13 common physiotherapeutic exercises, classified as weight bearing, isometric, long lever arm, or dynamic exercises, and compared to the loads during walking. RESULTS: With peak values up to 441%BW, weight bearing exercises caused the highest forces among all exercises; in some patients they exceeded those during walking. During voluntary isometric contractions, the peak loads ranged widely and potentially reached high levels, depending on the intensity of the contraction. Long lever arms and dynamic exercises caused loads that were distributed around 50% of those during walking. CONCLUSION: Weight bearing exercises should be avoided or handled cautiously within the early post-operative period. The hip joint loads during isometric exercises depend strongly on the contraction intensity. Nonetheless, most physiotherapeutic exercises seem to be non-hazardous when considering the load magnitudes, even though the loads were much higher than expected. When deciding between partial and full weight bearing, physicians should consider the loads relative to those caused by activities of daily living.

Effect of an orthosis on the loads acting on a vertebral body replacement.

BACKGROUND: The spinal load reduction by an orthosis is still a matter of debate. Some studies predicted a load reduction while others found no effect. The aim of this study was to measure the in vivo effect of the Lumbo TriStep brace and the hyperextension orthosis medi 3C on the spinal implant loads. METHODS: Telemeterized vertebral body replacements were implanted in 5 patients suffering from a severe fracture of the L1 or L3 vertebral body. The implant allows the measurement of 6 load components acting on it. For several activities during standing, sitting and walking, implant loads were measured in patients with and without an orthosis. FINDINGS: The average resultant force on the vertebral body for 26 activities was reduced by 9% with the Lumbo TriStep brace, and by 19% with the hyperextension orthosis. The force reduction is usually more pronounced for activities performed during sitting than it is for those performed while standing. However, considerable inter- and intra-individual variation was observed. In several cases, the measured implant forces were even higher when the patients were wearing an orthosis. INTERPRETATION: In some patients, for certain activities, an orthosis may reduce the force on a vertebral body replacement and thus on the anterior column of the spine. However, in other patients for the same activities, an orthosis may increase the force. The measurements do not allow a clear recommendation to wear an orthosis since the clinically relevant reduction of implant forces is unknown.

Lifting up and laying down a weight causes high spinal loads.

Lifting up weights from a cupboard or table and putting them back are activities of daily living. Patients with spinal problems want to know whether they should avoid these activities. However, little is known about the spinal forces during these activities and about the effect of level height. Loads on a telemeterized vertebral body replacement were measured in 5 patients. The effect of level height when lifting or setting down weights of 0.01, 1.5 and 3.0 kg in a standing posture were investigated. Furthermore, these weights were lifted and set down with a stretched arm while sitting at a table. No instructions were given on how to perform the task. For these activities, forces as high as 5 times the value for standing alone were measured. In 2 patients, implant loads decreased with increasing level height. In the other patients the effect of level height was small. Lifting a weight from a table with a stretched arm while sitting led to a strong increase of the maximum implant force. Setting down the weight usually caused a slightly higher maximum implant force than lifting it. Forces on a vertebral body replacement during lifting and setting down a weight varied strongly when no precise instructions were given on how to perform the activity. Thus, the measured forces are representative for such activities performed in daily life. This, however, led to wide variations in measured data. Compared to the value for standing, 5 times higher forces were measured for lifting and setting down of weights. This suggests that these activities should be avoided by patients who have spinal problems.

The influence of footwear on knee joint loading during walking--in vivo load measurements with instrumented knee implants.

Since footwear is commonly used every day, its influence on knee joint loading and thereby on the development and progression of osteoarthritis may be crucial. So far the influence of footwear has been examined only indirectly. The aim of this study was to directly measure the effect of footwear on tibiofemoral contact loads during walking. Instrumented knee implants with telemetric data transmission were used to measure the tibiofemoral contact forces and moments in six subjects. The loads during walking with four different shoes (basic running shoes, advanced running shoes, classical dress shoes and shoes with a soft rounded sole in the sagittal plane (MBT)) were compared to those during barefoot walking. Peak values of all six load components were analyzed. In general, footwear tended to increase knee joint loading slightly, with the dress shoe being the most unfavorable type of footwear. At the early stance phase all load components were increased by all shoe types. The resultant force rose by 2-5%, the internal adduction moment by 7-12% and the forces on the medial compartment by 3-5%. Significant reductions of the resultant force were solely observed for the advanced running shoe (-6%) and the MBT (-9%) shoe at late stance. Also the medial compartment force was slightly yet non-significantly reduced by 2-5% with the two shoes. It is questionable whether such small load changes have an influence on the progression of gonarthrosis. Future research is necessary to examine which factors regarding the shoe design, such as heel height, arch support or flexibility are most decisive for a reduction of knee joint loading.

High-tech hip implant for wireless temperature measurements in vivo.

When walking long distances, hip prostheses heat up due to friction. The influence of articulating materials and lubricating properties of synovia on the final temperatures, as well as any potential biological consequences, are unknown. Such knowledge is essential for optimizing implant materials, identifying patients who are possibly at risk of implant loosening, and proving the concepts of current joint simulators. An instrumented hip implant with telemetric data transfer was developed to measure the implant temperatures in vivo. A clinical study with 100 patients is planned to measure the implant temperatures for different combinations of head and cup materials during walking. This study will answer the question of whether patients with synovia with poor lubricating properties may be at risk for thermally induced bone necrosis and subsequent implant failure. The study will also deliver the different friction properties of various implant materials and prove the significance of wear simulator tests. A clinically successful titanium hip endoprosthesis was modified to house the electronics inside its hollow neck. The electronics are powered by an external induction coil fixed around the joint. A temperature sensor inside the implant triggers a timer circuit, which produces an inductive pulse train with temperature-dependent intervals. This signal is detected by a giant magnetoresistive sensor fixed near the external energy coil. The implant temperature is measured with an accuracy of 0.1°C in a range between 20°C and 58°C and at a sampling rate of 2-10 Hz. This rate could be considerably increased for measuring other data, such as implant strain or vibration. The employed technique of transmitting data from inside of a closed titanium implant by low frequency magnetic pulses eliminates the need to use an electrical feedthrough and an antenna outside of the implant. It enables the design of mechanically safe and simple instrumented implants.

Influence of limb alignment on mediolateral loading in total knee replacement: in vivo measurements in five patients.

BACKGROUND: Malalignment after total knee replacement could cause overloading of the implant bearing as well as of the bone itself, leading to osteolysis and early loosening. To quantify the stresses the implant has to withstand and to define a safe zone of limb alignment, the total contact forces as well as their mediolateral distribution have to be determined. Analytical gait data and mathematical models have been used for this purpose. We performed this study to determine in vivo loads of five patients after implantation of an instrumented tibial baseplate. METHODS: Five patients with osteoarthritis of the knee received total knee replacement. The tibial component was instrumented with strain gauges for the measurement of three forces and three moments. The signals from the gauges were transferred telemetrically to an external receiver. At twelve months after surgery, postoperative measurements were obtained with the patients walking at a self-selected comfortable speed across a level walkway. Peak axial and medial forces of fifteen to twenty gait cycles were averaged and reported as a percent of individual body weight. RESULTS: During the stance phase of the gait cycle, two maxima of the axial force occurred. Typical values were 215% of body weight at the first peak and 266% of body weight at the second peak. The medial load share was typically 73% at the first axial force peak and 65% at the second axial force peak. Analysis of inter-individual variations revealed a linear correlation with limb alignment. A deviation of 1° varus from neutral alignment increased the medial load share by 5%. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with the results of previous studies, we found that the force transferred by the medial compartment was usually greater than that transferred by the lateral compartment. Concerning the design of total knee replacements, an asymmetric tibial component with a larger medial contact area could possibly reduce peak contact stress on the bone and improve fixation of the implant. Mediolateral load distribution was quantified and correlated with limb alignment, thereby permitting the effects of malalignment after total knee replacement to be estimated.

Loading of the knee joint during ergometer cycling: telemetric in vivo data.

STUDY DESIGN: Within-subject, repeated-measures design. OBJECTIVES: To measure tibiofemoral contact forces during cycling in vivo and to quantify the influences of power, pedaling cadence, and seat height on tibiofemoral contact forces. BACKGROUND: Cycling is usually classified as a low-demand activity for the knee joint and is therefore recommended for persons with osteoarthritis and rehabilitation programs following knee surgery. However, there are limited data regarding actual joint loading. METHODS: Instrumented knee implants with telemetric data transmission were used to measure the tibiofemoral contact forces. Data were obtained in 9 subjects, during ergometer cycling and walking, 15 ± 7 months after total knee arthroplasty. Tibiofemoral forces during cycling at power levels between 25 and 120 W, cadences of 40 and 60 rpm, and 2 seat heights were investigated. RESULTS: Within the examined power range, tibiofemoral forces during cycling were smaller than those during walking. At the moderate condition of 60 W and 40 rpm, peak resultant forces of 119% of body weight were measured during the pedal downstroke. Shear forces ranged from 5% to 7% of body weight. Forces increased linearly with cycling power. Higher cadences led to smaller forces. A lower seat height did not increase the resultant force but caused higher posterior shear forces. CONCLUSION: Due to the relatively small tibiofemoral forces, cycling with moderate power levels is suited for individuals with osteoarthritis and rehabilitation programs following knee surgery, such as cartilage repair or total knee replacement. The lowest forces can be expected while cycling at a low power level, a high cadence, and a high seat height.

Measured loads on a vertebral body replacement during sitting.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Sitting is frequently assumed to cause high spinal loads because people with sedentary work often suffer from low back pain. It is assumed that the posture while sitting, as well as several seat parameters, also affects the spinal loads. PURPOSE: To measure the loads on a spinal implant for different upper body inclinations, backrest declinations, seat heights, types of seat, and arm positions. STUDY DESIGN: Loads on a vertebral body replacement during sitting were measured in five patients with telemeterized implants. METHODS: The telemeterized vertebral body replacement measures all six load components. It was implanted into five patients suffering from compression fractures of a lumbar vertebral body. Loads were measured when the patients were sitting on a stool and inclining their upper body between 15° flexion and 10° extension in steps of 5°; on a chair with an adjustable backrest that allowed declination angles between 108° and 180°; on an office chair while the seat height was varied between 40 and 60 cm in steps of 5 cm; and successively on seven different types of seats. The effect of the arm position was also studied. RESULTS: The resultant implant force was increased on the average by 48% for 15° flexion and decreased by 19% for 10° extension of the trunk. When sitting on a chair with an adjustable backrest, the loads decreased with an increasing backrest declination angle. The seat height had in most cases only a minor effect on implant loads. In comparison to sitting on a stool, the loads were reduced when sitting on a bench (7%) or a stool with a padded wedge (9%), a knee stool (19%), a chair (35%), and an office chair (41%). Sitting on a physiotherapy ball increased the loads by 7%. Placing the hands on the thighs reduced the implant loads on the average by 19% in comparison to arms hanging on the sides. CONCLUSION: Spinal loads can be reduced by leaning against the backrest, placing the arms on the armrest or the thighs, and by decreasing the flexion angle of the upper body.

The effect of laterally wedged shoes on the loading of the medial knee compartment-in vivo measurements with instrumented knee implants.

A conventional method to unload the medial compartment of patients with gonarthrosis and thus to achieve pain reduction is the use of laterally wedged shoes. Our aim was to measure in vivo their effect on medial compartment loads using instrumented knee implants. Medial tibio-femoral contact forces were measured in six subjects with instrumented knee implants during walking with the following shoes: without wedge, with 5 and 10 mm wedges under the lateral sole, and with a laterally wedged insole (5 mm). Measurements were repeated with the shoes in combination with an ankle-stabilizing orthosis. Without orthosis, peak medial forces were reduced by only 1-4% on average. With orthosis, the average reduction was 2-7%. Highest reductions were generally observed with the 10 mm wedge, followed by the 5 mm wedge, and the 5 mm insole. Individual force reductions reached up to 15%. Medial force reductions while walking with wedged shoes were generally small. Due to high inter-individual differences, it seems that some patients might benefit from lateral wedges, whereas others might not. Further analyses of the individual kinematics will show which factors are most decisive for the reduction of medial compartment load.

Comparison of two methods for in vivo estimation of the glenohumeral joint rotation center (GH-JRC) of the patients with shoulder hemiarthroplasty.

Determination of an accurate glenohumeral-joint rotation center (GH-JRC) from marker data is essential for kinematic and dynamic analysis of shoulder motions. Previous studies have focused on the evaluation of the different functional methods for the estimation of the GH-JRC for healthy subjects. The goal of this paper is to compare two widely used functional methods, namely the instantaneous helical axis (IHA) and symmetrical center of rotation (SCoRE) methods, for estimating the GH-JRC in vivo for patients with implanted shoulder hemiarthroplasty. The motion data of five patients were recorded while performing three different dynamic motions (circumduction, abduction, and forward flexion). The GH-JRC was determined using the CT-images of the subjects (geometric GH-JRC) and was also estimated using the two IHA and SCoRE methods. The rotation centers determined using the IHA and SCoRE methods were on average 1.47±0.62 cm and 2.07±0.55 cm away from geometric GH-JRC, respectively. The two methods differed significantly (two-tailed p-value from paired t-Test ∼0.02, post-hoc power ∼0.30). The SCoRE method showed a significant lower (two-tailed p-value from paired t-Test ∼0.03, post-hoc power ∼0.68) repeatability error calculated between the different trials of each motion and each subject and averaged across all measured subjects (0.62±0.10 cm for IHA vs. 0.43±0.12 cm for SCoRE). It is concluded that the SCoRE appeared to be a more repeatable method whereas the IHA method resulted in a more accurate estimation of the GH-JRC for patients with endoprostheses.