The Relationship of Cup Inclination and Anteversion in the Coronal Plane with Ante-Inclination in the Sagittal Plane: Exposing the Fallacy of Cup Safe Zones.

Background: This study aimed to establish an equation for calculating cup ante-inclination (AI) from radiographic cup inclination and anteversion, to validate this equation in a total hip arthroplasty (THA) cohort, and to test whether achieving previously described radiographic cup inclination and anteversion targets would also satisfy sagittal cup AI targets. Methods: A mathematical equation linking cup AI, radiographic inclination (RI), and anteversion (RA) was determined: tan(AI) = tan(RA)/cos(RI). Supine and standing anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of 440 consecutive THAs were assessed to measure cup RI and RA and spinopelvic parameters, including cup AI, using a validated software tool. Whether orientation within previously defined RI and RA targets was associated with achieving the AI target and satisfying the sagittal component orientation (combined sagittal index, 205° to 245°) was tested. Results: The cups in the THA cohort had a measured mean inclination (and standard deviation) of 43° ± 7°, anteversion of 26° ± 9°, and AI of 34° ± 10°. The calculated cup AI was 34° ± 12°. A strong correlation existed between measured and calculated AI (r = 0.75; p < 0.001), with a mean error of 0° ± 8°. The inclination and anteversion targets were both satisfied in 194 (44.1%) to 330 (75.0%) of the cases, depending on the safe zone targets that were used, and 311 cases (70.7%) satisfied the AI target. Only 125 (28.4%) to 233 (53.0%) of the cases satisfied the AI target as well as the inclination and anteversion targets. Satisfying inclination and anteversion targets was not associated with increased chances of satisfying the AI target. Conclusions: Achieving optimal cup inclination and anteversion does not ensure optimal orientation in the sagittal plane. The equation and nomograms provided can be used to determine and visualize how the 2 planes used for evaluating the cup orientation and the pertinent angles relate, potentially aiding in preoperative planning.

How Does Radiographic Acetabular Morphology Change Between the Supine and Standing Positions in Asymptomatic Volunteers?

BACKGROUND: The radiographic appearance of the acetabulum differs between the supine and standing positions in patients with hip conditions. The pelvis undergoes a change in tilt when transitioning between positions, resulting in variations in version and acetabular coverage. However, the extent of these variations in well-functioning volunteers without compensatory patterns caused by pain is unknown. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We performed this study to (1) quantify differences in radiographic acetabular measurements when transitioning between supine and standing among asymptomatic, well-functioning volunteers; (2) assess differences in pelvic tilt between positions; and (3) test whether individual anatomic parameters are associated with the change in tilt. METHODS: This was a prospective, single-center study performed at an academic referral center. One hundred volunteers (students, staff, and patients with upper limb injuries) with well-functioning hips (Oxford hip score ≥ 45) were invited to participate. A total of 45% (45) of them were female, their mean age was 37 ± 14 years, and their mean BMI was 25 ± 2 kg/m2. Supine and standing AP pelvic radiographs were analyzed to determine numerous acetabular parameters including the lateral center-edge angle (LCEA), acetabular index (AI), anterior wall index (AWI), posterior wall index (PWI), crossover sign (COS), crossover ratio (COR), posterior wall sign (PWS), ischial spine sign (ISS), and femoroepiphyseal acetabular roof index (FEAR), as well as pelvic parameters including the sacrofemoral-pubic angle (SFP). Spinopelvic parameters were measured from lateral standing spinopelvic radiographs. Radiographic measurements were performed by one hip preservation research fellow and a fellowship-trained staff surgeon. Differences in parameters were determined, and correlations between postural differences and morphological parameters were tested. Clinically important differences were defined as a difference greater than 3° for acetabular angle measurements and 0.03 for acetabular ratio measurements, based on previous studies. RESULTS: Lateral coverage angles did not show a clinically important difference between positions. AWI decreased when standing (0.47 ± 0.13 versus 0.41 ± 0.14; p < 0.001), whereas acetabular retroversion signs were more pronounced when supine (COS: 34% [34 of 100], PWS: 68% [68 of 100], and ISS: 34% [34 of 100] versus COS: 19% [19 of 100], PWS: 38% [38 of 100], and ISS: 14% [14 of 100]; all p values < 0.05). Pelvic tilt increased by a mean of 4° ± 4° when standing, but the range of change was from -15° to 7°. The change in AWI (ρ = 0.47; p < 0.001), PWI (ρ = -0.45; p < 0.001), and COR (ρ = 0.52; p < 0.001) between positions correlated with ΔSFP. Volunteers with spinal imbalance (pelvic incidence lumbar lordosis > 10°) demonstrated greater change in pelvic tilt (ΔSFP) (-7° ± 3° versus -4° ± 4°; p = 0.02) and a greater reduction in AWI (by 10%). These volunteers demonstrated reduced standing lumbar lordosis angles (45° ± 11° versus 61° ± 10°; p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Acetabular version increases from supine to standing because of an increase in pelvic tilt. The change in pelvic tilt between positions exhibited substantial variability. Individuals with reduced lumbar lordosis for a given pelvic incidence value demonstrated greater pelvic mobility. No features on supine radiographs were associated with the change in tilt. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Performing standing radiographs in addition to supine views can help identify aberrant physiologic patterns in patients with diagnostic dilemmas and might thus help with management. Normative data of pelvic tilt change can help clinicians identify patients who demonstrate excessive change in tilt that contributes to abnormal hip pathomechanics.

How Is Variability in Femoral and Acetabular Version Associated With Presentation Among Young Adults With Hip Pain?

BACKGROUND: Acetabular and femoral version contribute to hip pain in patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) or dysplasia. However, definitions and measurement methods of femoral version have varied in different studies, resulting in different "normal" values being used by clinicians for what should be the same anatomic measurement. This could result in discrepant or even inappropriate treatment recommendations. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: In patients undergoing hip preservation surgery, (1) what is the range of acetabular and femoral version at presentation, and how much do two commonly used measurement techniques (those of Murphy and Reikerås) differ? (2) How are differences in acetabular and femoral version associated with clinical factors and outcomes scores at the time of presentation? METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of data gathered in a longitudinally maintained database of patients undergoing hip preservation at a tertiary care referral center. Between June 2020 and December 2021, 282 hips in 258 patients were treated for an isolated labral tear (9% [26 hips]), hip dysplasia (21% [59 hips]), FAI (52% [147 hips]), mixed FAI and dysplasia (17% [47 hips]), or pediatric deformity (slipped capital femoral head epiphysis or Perthes disease; 1% [3 hips]) with hip arthroscopy (71% [200 hips]), periacetabular osteotomy (26% [74 hips]), surgical hip dislocation (2.5% [7 hips]), or femoral derotation osteotomy (0.5% [1 hip]). We considered those with complete radiographic data (CT including the pelvis and distal femur) and patient-reported outcome scores as potentially eligible. Exclusion criteria were age younger than 18 or older than 55 years (5 hips, 3 patients), signs of hip osteoarthritis (Tönnis grade ≥ 2; 0), pediatric deformity (slipped capital femoral head epiphysis or Perthes disease; 3 hips, 3 patients), previous femoral or acetabular osteotomy (2 hips, 2 patients), avascular necrosis of the femoral head (0), history of neuromuscular disorder (Ehlers-Danlos syndrome; 3 hips, 3 patients) or rheumatoid disease (ankylosing spondylitis; 1 hip, 1 patient), and when CT did not include the knees (19 hips, 19 patients). Based on these criteria, 249 hips in 227 patients were included. Of patients with bilateral symptomatic hips, one side was randomly selected for inclusion, leaving 227 hips in 227 patients for further analysis. The patients' median age (range) was 34 years (19 to 55 years), the median BMI (range) was 27 kg/m2 (16 to 55 kg/m2), and 63% (144) were female; they were treated with hip arthroscopy (in 74% [168]) or periacetabular osteotomy (in 23% [52]). Patients underwent a CT scan to measure acetabular version and femoral version using the Murphy (low < 10°; normal: 10° to 25°; high > 25°) or Reikerås (low < 5°; normal: 5° to 20°; high > 20°) technique. The McKibbin index was calculated (low: < 20°; normal: 20° to 50°; high > 50°). Based on the central acetabular version and femoral version as measured by Murphy, hips were grouped according to their rotational profile into four groups: unstable rotational profile: high (high acetabular version with high femoral version) or moderate (high acetabular version with normal femoral version or normal acetabular version with high femoral version); normal rotational profile (normal acetabular version with femoral version); compensatory rotational profile (low acetabular version with high femoral version or high acetabular version with low femoral version); and impingement rotational profile (low acetabular version with low femoral version): high (low acetabular version with low femoral version) or moderate (low acetabular version with normal femoral version or normal acetabular version with low femoral version). Radiographic assessments were manually performed on digitized images by two orthopaedic residents, and 25% of randomly selected measurements were repeated by the senior author, a fellowship-trained hip preservation and arthroplasty surgeon. Interobserver and intraobserver reliabilities were calculated using the correlation coefficient with a two-way mixed model, showing excellent agreement for Murphy technique measurements (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.908 [95% confidence interval 0.80 to 0.97]) and Reikerås technique measurements (ICC 0.938 [95% CI 0.81 to 0.97]). Patient-reported measures were recorded using the International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-33) (0 to 100; worse to best). RESULTS: The mean acetabular version was 18° ± 6°, and mean femoral version was 24° ± 12° using the Murphy technique and 12° ± 11° with the Reikerås method. Eighty percent (181 of 227) of hips had normal acetabular version, 42% (96 of 227) to 63% (142 to 227) had normal femoral version per Murphy and Reikerås, respectively, and 67% (152 to 227) had a normal McKibbin index. Patients with an impingement profile (low acetabular version or femoral version) were older (39 ± 9 years) than patients with an unstable (high acetabular version or femoral version; 33 ± 9 years; p = 0.004), normal (33 ± 9 years; p = 0.02), or compensatory (high acetabular version with low femoral version or vice versa; 33 ± 7 years; p = 0.08) rotational profile. Using the Murphy technique, femoral version was 12° greater than with the Reikerås method (R2 0.85; p < 0.001). There were no differences in iHOT-33 score between different groups (impingement: 32 ± 17 versus normal 35 ± 21 versus compensated: 34 ± 20 versus unstable: 31 ± 17; p = 0.40). CONCLUSION: Variability in femoral version is twice as large as acetabular version. Patients with an impingement rotational profile were older than patients with a normal, compensatory, or unstable profile, indicating there are other variables not yet fully accounted for that lead to earlier pain and presentation in these groups. Important differences exist between measurement methods. This study shows that different measurement methods for femoral anteversion result in different numbers; if other authors compare their results to those of other studies, they should use equations such as the one suggested in this study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, prognostic study.

Change in cup orientation from supine to standing posture: a prospective cohort study of 419 total hip arthroplasties.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Arthroplasty surgeons traditionally assess cup orientation after total hip arthroplasty (THA) on supine radiographs. Contemporary hip-spine analyses provide information on standing, functional cup orientation. This study aims to (i) characterize cup orientations when supine and standing; (ii) determine orientation differences between postures; and (iii) identify factors associated with magnitude of orientation differences. METHODS: This is a 2-center, multi-surgeon, prospective, consecutive cohort study. 419 primary THAs were included (57% women; mean age: 64 years, standard deviation [SD] 11). All patients underwent supine and standing antero-posterior pelvic and lateral spinopelvic radiographs. Cup orientation and spinopelvic parameters were measured. Target cup orientation was defined as inclination/anteversion of 40°/20° ± 10°. A change in orientation (Δinclination/Δanteversion) between postures > 5° was defined as clinically significant. Variability was defined as 2 x SD. RESULTS: Inclination increased from 40° (supine) to 42° (standing) corresponding to a Δinclination of 2° (95% confidence interval [CI] 2-3). Anteversion increased from 25° (supine) to 30° (standing) corresponding to a Δanteversion of 5° (CI 5-6). When supine, 69% (CI 65-74) of THAs were within target, but only 44% (CI 39-49) were within target when standing, resulting in a further 26% (CI 21-30) being out of target when standing. From supine to standing, a clinically significant change in anteversion (> 5°) was seen in 47% (CI 42-52) of cases. Δanteversion was higher in women than in men (6°, CI 5-7 vs 5°, CI 4-5) corresponding to a difference of 1° (CI 1-2), which was dependent on tilt change, standing cup anteversion, age, and standing pelvic tilt. CONCLUSION: Cup inclination and version increase upon standing but significant variability exists due to patient factors.

Fellowship Training in Arthroplasty Improves Treatment Success of Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention for Periprosthetic Knee Infections.

Background: Debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) is a well-accepted surgical strategy for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). DAIR in TKA may be incorrectly thought of as a "simple" procedure not requiring formal specialized training in arthroplasty. Currently, there are no studies comparing the risk of treatment failure based on surgeon fellowship training. Methods: A retrospective review was performed of consecutive patients who underwent DAIR for TKA PJI at our institution. Two cohorts were created based on whether DAIR was performed by an arthroplasty fellowship-trained (FT) surgeon or nonarthroplasty fellowship-trained (NoFT) surgeon. Primary outcome was treatment failure following DAIR at a minimum of 1 year postoperatively. Treatment failure was based on the Tier 1 International Consensus Meeting definition of infection control. Secondary outcomes were also recorded including death during the totality of PJI treatment. Results: A total of 112 patients were identified (FT = 68, NoFT = 44). At a mean follow-up of 7.3 years [standard deviation = 3.9], 73 patients (59.8%) failed treatment. Fellowship training in arthroplasty significantly improved treatment success rates (FT, 35/68 [51.5%]; NoFT, 10/44 [22.7%]; odds ratio 2.5 [95% confidence interval 1.1 to 5.9; P = .002]). Survivorship also differed significantly between the cohorts; at timepoints of 1.5 months, 5 months, 30 months, and 180 months, survivorship of the FT cohort was 79.4%, 67.6%, 54.4%, and 50.7%, respectively, compared with a survivorship of 65.9%, 52.3%, 25%, and 22.7% in the NoFT cohort (P = .002). Conclusions: TKA PJI treated with DAIR should not be considered a simple procedure. Improved treatment success may be associated with subspecialty fellowship training in arthroplasty. Level of Evidence: IV.

Impact of Offset and Leg Length on Functional Outcomes Post-Total Hip Arthroplasty: How Accurate Should Coronal Reconstruction Be?

BACKGROUND: Accurate hip reconstruction is associated with improved biomechanical behavior following total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, whether this is associated with improved patient-reported outcomes (PROs) is unknown. HYPOTHESIS/PURPOSE: This study aimed to: 1) describe the ability to reconstruct coronal geometry during THA without advanced technology; 2) assess whether restoration of global offset (GO) and leg length (LL) is associated with improved PROs; and 3) investigate whether increased femoral offset (FO) to compensate for reduced acetabular offset (AO) influences PROs. METHOD: This was a prospective, multicenter, consecutive cohort study of 500 patients treated with primary THA without robotics or navigation. The Oxford Hip score (OHS) was obtained preoperatively and at 1-year follow-up. Supine anteroposterior pelvic radiographs were analyzed to determine AO, FO, GO, and LL relative to the native contralateral side. Contour plots for ΔOHS based on ΔLL and ΔGO were created, and ΔOHS was calculated within and outside various ranges (±2.5, ±5, or ±10 mm). RESULTS: In the operated hip, mean FO increased by 3 ± 6 mm (range, -16 to 27), while AO decreased by 2 ± 4 mm (range, -17 to 10). The contour graph for ±2.5 mm zones showed the best outcomes (ΔOHS >25) with GO and LL centered on 0 ± 2.5 mm (P < .01). However, only 10% achieved such reconstruction. When GO and LL differences were within ±10 mm, ΔOHS was superior when both AO and FO were within ±5 mm (mean: 24 ± 10; range, -5 to 40) compared with when FO was above 5 mm to compensate for a reduction in AO (mean: 22 ± 11; range, -10 to 46; P = .040). CONCLUSIONS: The PROs were associated with biomechanical reconstruction, and the best clinical improvement can be expected when GO and LL differences are both within 2.5 mm. Maintenance of AO is important, as compensation by increasing FO is associated with inferior OHS.

National Institute of Health and Care Excellence Guidelines for Displaced Intracapsular Hip Fractures: Examining Satisfaction With the Guidelines and Effects on Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The objectives of the study were to: (1) evaluate satisfaction with the new 2023 National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) criteria for selecting total hip arthroplasty (THA) over hemiarthroplasty and surgical recommendations for treatment of displaced intracapsular hip fractures; (2) describe why THA is performed when NICE criteria are not met; and (3) determine whether satisfaction with these guidelines is associated with improved outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of patients who had a displaced intracapsular hip fracture treated with THA at a single tertiary academic center between 2010 and 2022 was performed. Preoperative patient characteristics were reviewed to determine if the indication for THA met NICE criteria. Operative details, perioperative complications, reoperation, and revision arthroplasty within 12 months of surgery were recorded. RESULTS: Data from 196 patients (63% women; age 67 ± 10 years) were used. There were 161 THAs (82.1%) that satisfied NICE criteria. The 2 most common reasons for performing a THA when NICE criteria were not met (n = 35) included preoperative radiographic osteoarthritis (Tönnis grade ≥ 2; 48.6%) and decreased patient age (< 65 years; 31.5%). Satisfaction with the NICE criteria was associated with fewer perioperative complications (0.6 versus 37.1%; P < .001), reoperations (0.6 versus 31.4%; P < .001), and revisions (0.6 versus 28.6%; P < .001). The most common reason for revision was periprosthetic fracture, possibly secondary to the use of uncemented femoral stems (171 of 196, 87.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Satisfaction with the new NICE criteria is associated with improved perioperative outcomes. Further studies are necessary to determine if preexisting hip osteoarthritis and younger age merit consideration in patient selection.

Lower Rates of Reoperation Following Partial or Complete Revision Arthroplasty Compared to Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention for Early Postoperative and Acute Hematogenous Periprosthetic Hip Infection.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to: 1) compare treatment outcomes between debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) and partial or complete revision arthroplasty (RA) for early postoperative and acute hematogenous total hip arthroplasty periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) and 2) identify factors associated with treatment outcome. METHODS: The study consisted of a retrospective cohort of patients who underwent surgery for PJI between 2004 and 2021. There were 76 patients (74.5%) who underwent DAIR and 26 patients (25.5%) who underwent RA. Treatment success was defined as treatment eradication at a minimum of a 2-year follow up. Bivariate regression analysis was used to assess the effect of different factors on treatment outcomes. Kaplan-Meier survivorship was performed to compare survivorship between cohorts. RESULTS: At a mean follow-up of 8.2 years (range, 2.2 to 16.4), significantly more DAIR failed treatment (DAIR, 50 [65.8%]; 10 [38.5%]; P = .015). The 8-year Kaplan-Meier survivorship was 35.1% [95% confidence interval (CI), 24.3 to 45.9] for patients treated with DAIR and 61.5% [95% CI, 42.9 to 80.1] for those treated with RA (log rank = 0.039). Bivariate regression analysis showed performing a RA was associated with a higher likelihood of treatment success (odds ratio 4.499, 95% CI 1.600 to 12.647, P = .004), whereas a higher body mass index was associated with treatment failure (odds ratio 0.934, 95% CI 0.878 to 0.994, P = .032). CONCLUSIONS: To reduce the rate of recalcitrant infection following early postoperative or acute hematogenous total hip arthroplasty PJI, RA may be of benefit over DAIR. This is especially relevant in the early postoperative period, when components can be readily exchanged.

How Do Spinopelvic Characteristics Change Post-Total Hip Arthroplasty? A Longitudinal Assessment Raising Awareness of the Postoperative Period.

BACKGROUND: Spinopelvic characteristics, including sacral slope (SS), are commonly evaluated in different positions pre-total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study aimed to: 1) investigate the change in spinopelvic parameters at 7 days (early) and 1-year post-THA; and 2) identify patient characteristics associated with a change in SS of more than 7° post-THA. METHODS: We prospectively studied 250 patients who underwent unilateral THA [132 women, age 66 years (range, 32 to 88)] and underwent biplanar images preoperatively and at 7 days and 1-year post-THA. Parameters measured included pelvic incidence, standing lumbar lordosis, SS, and proximal femoral angle (PFA). A SS change ≥ 7° was considered the threshold as it would result in more than a 5° change in cup orientation. RESULTS: Early post-THA SSstanding remained within ± 6º from preoperative measurements in 75% of patients, reduced by ≥ 7° in 9%, and increased by ≥ 7° in 16%. Those that showed a reduction in SS had the lowest PFA and the highest SS pre-THA (P = .028, .107, and < 0.001, respectively). From 7 days until the 1-year mark, pelvic tilt increased, SS reduced (mean: -4º, range: -29 to 17º, P < .001), and patients stood with greater hip extension ΔPFAstanding (mean 7°, range: -34 to 37°, P < .001). At 1 year, SSseated had remained within ± 6º, relative to the pre-THA value, in 49% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Standing spinopelvic characteristics, especially SSstanding, remain within ±6° in three-quarters of patients both early- and at 1-year post-THA. In the remaining cases, pelvic tilt changes significantly. In 9% of cases, SS reduces ≥ 7° early THA, probably due to the alleviation of fixed-flexion contractures. The SSseated changes by ≥ ± 7° in almost 50% of cases in this study, and its clinical value as a preoperative planning tool should be questioned. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, diagnostic study.

Prevalence of anemia and association with outcome in joint arthroplasty - is there a difference between primary and revision cases?

PURPOSE: Anemia has been shown to be a modifiable pre-operative, patient factor associated with outcome following arthroplasty. The aims of this retrospective study were to (1) ascertain the prevalence of preoperative anemia in patients undergoing primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty at a tertiary referral center and (2) to test the association with outcome and whether it differs between primary and revision cases. METHODS: All hip and knee primary and revision arthroplasties performed at a Canadian academic, tertiary-care, arthroplasty center between 2012 and 2017 were included in this study. The study group consisted of 5944 patients, of which 5251 were primary Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasties or Hip Resurfacings and 693 were revision arthroplasties (65% hip revisions/35% knee revisions). Anemia was classified as per WHO definition (hemoglobin < 130 g/L for men and < 120 g/L for women). All anemic patients were grouped into mild, moderate or severe anemia. Length-of-stay, perioperative transfusion-rate, 90-day readmission, overall complication rate and reoperation rates were recorded. The effect of preoperative anemia and the effect of severity of the anemia was evaluated through multivariable regression analysis controlling for relevant covariates. RESULTS: Preoperatively, 15% (786/5251) of the primary patients and 47% (322/693) of the revision arthroplasty patients were anemic preoperatively. Anemic revision patients were 3.1 times more likely (95% CI: 1.47-6.33) to obtain blood transfusions during the hospital stay, compared to a 4.9 times higher risk in primary patients. The odds ratio to sustain any postoperative complication if anemic was 1.5 times higher (95% CI: 0.73-3.16) in revision patients and 1.7 in primary cases. In addition, the 90-day readmission rate among both groups was 1.6 times higher in anemic patients. Furthermore, anemic revision patients had a 5.3 days longer length of stay (95% CI: 2.63-7.91), compared to only 1 additional day in anemic primary patients (95% CI: 0.69-1.34). CONCLUSION: In this study cohort, the prevalence of anemia in patients awaiting revision arthroplasty was 3 times higher (46.6%) than in primary arthroplasty patients (18.7%). Preoperative anemia was associated with similarly, inferior outcomes in both groups. To reduce postoperative complications and the "burden" associated with anemia, these findings strongly recommend optimizing the preoperative hemoglobin in all arthroplasty patients. However, revision patients are affected more frequently, and particular attention must therefore be taken to this growing group in the future. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

A quasi-experimental evaluation of the association between implementation of Quality-Based Procedures funding for hip fractures and improvements in processes and outcomes for hip fracture patients in Ontario: an interrupted time series analysis.

PURPOSE: In 2013, Ontario introduced a patient-based funding model for hip fracture care (Quality-Based Procedures [QBP]). The association of QBP implementation with changes in processes and outcomes has not been evaluated. METHODS: We conducted a quasi-experimental study using linked health data for adult hip fractures as an interrupted time series. The pre-QBP period was from 2008 to 2012 and the post-QBP period was from 2014 to 2018; 2013 was excluded as a wash-in period. We used segmented regression analyses to estimate the association of QBP implementation with changes in processes (surgery in less than two days from admission, use of echocardiography, use of nerve blocks, and provision of geriatric care) and clinical outcomes (90-day mortality, 90-day readmissions, length of stay, and days alive at home). We estimated the immediate (level) change, trend (slope) postimplementation, and total counterfactual differences. Sensitivity analyses included case-mix adjustment and stratification by hospital type and procedure. RESULTS: We identified 45,500 patients in the pre-QBP period and 41,256 patients in the post-QBP period. There was a significant total counterfactual increase in the use of nerve blocks (11.1%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 6.2 to 16.0) and a decrease in the use of echocardiography (-2.5%; 95% CI, -3.7 to -1.3) after QBP implementation. The implementation of QBP was not associated with a clinically or statistically meaningful change in 90-day mortality, 90-day readmission, length of stay, or number of days alive at home. CONCLUSION: Evaluation of the QBP program is crucial to inform ongoing and future changes to policy and funding for hip fracture care. The introduction of the QBP Hip Fracture program, supported by evidence-based recommendations, was associated with improved application of some evidence-based processes of care but no changes in clinical outcomes. There is a need for ongoing development and evaluation of funding models to identify optimal strategies to improve the value and outcomes of hip fracture care. STUDY REGISTRATION: Open Science Framework ( https://osf.io/2938h/ ); first posted 13 June 2022.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: En 2013, l'Ontario a mis en place un modèle de financement axé sur les patient·es pour les soins suivant une fracture de la hanche (procédures fondées sur la qualité [PFQ]). L'association entre la mise en œuvre des PFQ et les changements dans les processus et les devenirs n'a pas été évaluée. MéTHODE: Nous avons mené une étude quasi expérimentale en utilisant des données de santé couplées pour les fractures de la hanche chez l'adulte comme une série chronologique interrompue. La période précédant les PFQ s'étendait de 2008 à 2012, et la période subséquente à l'implantation des PFQ allait de 2014 à 2018. L'année 2013 a été exclue en tant que période de rodage. Nous avons utilisé des analyses de régression segmentées pour estimer l'association entre la mise en œuvre des PFQ avec des changements aux processus (chirurgie en moins que deux jours suivant l'admission, utilisation de l'échocardiographie, utilisation de blocs nerveux et prestation de soins gériatriques) et des issues cliniques (mortalité à 90 jours, réadmissions à 90 jours, durée de séjour et jours de vie à domicile). Nous avons estimé le changement immédiat (niveau), la tendance (pente) après la mise en œuvre et les différences contrefactuelles totales. Les analyses de sensibilité comprenaient l'ajustement et la stratification de la combinaison de cas par type d'hôpital et par procédure. RéSULTATS: Nous avons identifié 45 500 patient·es dans la période pré-PFQ et 41 256 patient·es dans la période post-PFQ. Il y a eu une augmentation contrefactuelle totale significative de l'utilisation de blocs nerveux (11,1 %; intervalle de confiance [IC] à 95 %, 6,2 à 16,0) et une diminution de l'utilisation de l'échocardiographie (−2,5 %; IC 95 %, −3,7 à −1,3) après la mise en œuvre des PFQ. La mise en œuvre des PFQ n'a pas été associée à un changement cliniquement ou statistiquement significatif de la mortalité à 90 jours, de la réadmission à 90 jours, de la durée de séjour ou du nombre de jours de vie à domicile. CONCLUSION: L'évaluation du programme de PFQ est cruciale pour guider les changements actuels et futurs aux politiques et au financement des soins suivant une fracture de la hanche. La mise en place du programme de PFQ pour les fractures de la hanche, appuyée par des recommandations fondées sur des données probantes, a été associée à une meilleure application de certains processus de soins fondés sur des données probantes, mais à aucun changement dans les devenirs cliniques. Il est nécessaire d'élaborer et d'évaluer continuellement des modèles de financement afin de déterminer les stratégies optimales pour améliorer la valeur et les devenirs des soins suivant une fracture de la hanche. ENREGISTREMENT DE L'éTUDE: Open Science Framework ( https://osf.io/2938h/ ); première publication le 13 juin 2022.

Which Acetabular Measurements Most Accurately Differentiate Between Patients and Controls? A Comparative Study.

BACKGROUND: Acetabular morphology is an important determinant of hip biomechanics. To identify features of acetabular morphology that may be associated with the development of hip symptoms while accounting for spinopelvic characteristics, one needs to determine acetabular characteristics in a group of individuals older than 45 years without symptoms or signs of osteoarthritis. Previous studies have used patients with unknown physical status to define morphological thresholds to guide management. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) To determine acetabular morphological characteristics in males and females between 45 and 60 years old with a high Oxford hip score (OHS) and no signs of osteoarthritis; (2) to compare these characteristics with those of symptomatic hip patients treated with hip arthroscopy or periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) for various kinds of hip pathology (dysplasia, retroversion, and cam femoroacetabular impingement); and (3) to assess which radiographic or CT parameters most accurately differentiate between patients who had symptomatic hips and those who did not, and thus, define thresholds that can guide management. METHODS: Between January 2018 and December 2018, 1358 patients underwent an abdominopelvic CT scan in our institution for nonorthopaedic conditions. Of those, we considered 5% (73) of patients as potentially eligible as controls based on the absence of major hip osteoarthritis, trauma, or deformity. Patients were excluded if their OHS was 43 or less (2% [ 28 ]), if they had a PROMIS less than 50 (1% [ 18 ]), or their Tönnis score was higher than 1 (0.4% [ 6 ]). Another eight patients were excluded because of insufficient datasets. After randomly selecting one side for each control, 40 hips were left for analysis (age 55 ± 5 years; 48% [19 of 40] were in females). In this comparative study, this asymptomatic group was compared with a group of patients treated with hip arthroscopy or PAO. Between January 2013 and December 2020, 221 hips underwent hip preservation surgery. Of those, eight were excluded because of previous pelvic surgery, and 102 because of insufficient CT scans. One side was randomly selected in patients who underwent bilateral procedure, leaving 48% (107 of 221) of hips for analysis (age 31 ± 8 years; 54% [58 of 107] were in females). Detailed radiographic and CT assessments (including segmentation) were performed to determine acetabular (depth, cartilage coverage, subtended angles, anteversion, and inclination) and spinopelvic (pelvic tilt and incidence) parameters. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis was used to assess diagnostic accuracy and determine which morphological parameters (and their threshold) differentiate most accurately between symptomatic patients and asymptomatic controls. RESULTS: Acetabular morphology in asymptomatic hips was characterized by a mean depth of 22 ± 2 mm, with an articular cartilage surface of 2619 ± 415 mm 2 , covering 70% ± 6% of the articular surface, a mean acetabular inclination of 48° ± 6°, and a minimal difference between anatomical (24° ± 7°) and functional (22° ± 6°) anteversion. Patients with symptomatic hips generally had less acetabular depth (20 ± 4 mm versus 22 ± 2 mm, mean difference 3 mm [95% CI 1 to 4]; p < 0.001). Hips with dysplasia (67% ± 5% versus 70% ± 6%, mean difference 6% [95% CI 0% to 12%]; p = 0.03) or retroversion (67% ± 5% versus 70% ± 6%, mean difference 6% [95% CI 1% to 12%]; p = 0.04) had a slightly lower relative cartilage area compared with asymptomatic hips. There was no difference in acetabular inclination (48° ± 6° versus 47° ± 7°, mean difference 0.5° [95% CI -2° to 3°]; p = 0.35), but asymptomatic hips had higher anatomic anteversion (24° ± 7° versus 19° ± 8°, mean difference 6° [95% CI 3° to 9°]; p < 0.001) and functional anteversion (22° ± 6° versus 13°± 9°, mean difference 9° [95% CI 6° to 12°]; p < 0.001). Subtended angles were higher in asymptomatic at 105° (124° ± 7° versus 114° ± 12°, mean difference 11° [95% CI 3° to 17°]; p < 0.001), 135° (122° ± 9° versus 111° ± 12°, mean difference 10° [95% CI 2° to 15°]; p < 0.001), and 165° (112° ± 9° versus 102° ± 11°, mean difference 10° [95% CI 2° to 14°]; p < 0.001) around the acetabular clockface. Symptomatic hips had a lower pelvic tilt (8° ± 8° versus 11° ± 5°, mean difference 3° [95% CI 1° to 5°]; p = 0.007). The posterior wall index had the highest discriminatory ability of all measured parameters, with a cutoff value of less than 0.9 (area under the curve [AUC] 0.84 [95% CI 0.76 to 0.91]) for a symptomatic acetabulum (sensitivity 72%, specificity 78%). Diagnostically useful parameters on CT scan to differentiate between symptomatic and asymptomatic hips were acetabular depth less than 22 mm (AUC 0.74 [95% CI 0.66 to 0.83]) and functional anteversion less than 19° (AUC 0.79 [95% CI 0.72 to 0.87]). Subtended angles with the highest accuracy to differentiate between symptomatic and asymptomatic hips were those at 105° (AUC 0.76 [95% CI 0.65 to 0.88]), 135° (AUC 0.78 [95% CI 0.70 to 0.86]), and 165° (AUC 0.77 [95% CI 0.69 to 0.85]) of the acetabular clockface. CONCLUSION: An anatomical and functional acetabular anteversion of 24° and 22°, with a pelvic tilt of 10°, increases the acetabular opening and allows for more impingement-free flexion while providing sufficient posterosuperior coverage for loading. Hips with lower anteversion or a larger difference between anatomic and functional anteversion were more likely to be symptomatic. The importance of sufficient posterior coverage was also illustrated by the posterior wall indices and subtended angles at 105°, 135°, and 165° of the acetabular clockface having a high discriminatory ability to differentiate between symptomatic and asymptomatic hips. Future research should confirm whether integrating these parameters when selecting patients for hip preservation procedures can improve postoperative outcomes.Level of Evidence Level III, prognostic study.

What patient parameters influence lumbar stiffness in patients with hip pathology?

Lumbar stiffness leads to greater hip dependence to achieve sagittal motion and increases instability after total hip arthroplasty (THA). We aimed to determine parameters that influence lumbar stiffness among patients with hip pathology. We hypothesized that modifiable (degenerative changes, spinal canal stenosis, facet orientation) and nonmodifiable factors (muscle condition) would be associated with lumbar spine stiffness. In this retrospective case-cohort study from a tertiary referral center, consecutive patients presenting at a hip specialist clinic underwent standing and deep-seated radiographic assessment to measure lumbar lordosis (∆LL) (stiffness: ∆LL < 20°), hip flexion (∆PFA: pelvic femoral angle), and degree of degenerative-disc-disease (DDD) (facet osteoarthritis, disc height, endplate proliferative changes). Of these, 65 patients were selected with previous lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging, allowing to determine lumbar facet orientation, spinal canal stenosis (Schizas classification), and flexor- and extensor-muscle atrophy (Goutallier classification). Mean ∆LL was 45° (range: 11°-72°) and four patients (6%) exhibited spine stiffness. Patients with multilevel DDD (n = 22) had less ∆LL than those with no/single level (n = 43) DDD (34° [range: 11°-53°] vs. 51° [21°-72°]; p < 0.001). Number of DDD levels correlated strongly with ∆LL (ρ = -0.642; p < 0.001). Spinal stiffness was only seen in patients with ≥4 DDD levels. There was no correlation between ∆LL and facet orientation (p > 0.05). ∆LL correlated strongly with extensor atrophy at L3-L4 (ρ = -0.473), L4-L5 (ρ = -0.520), and L5-S1 (ρ = -0.473) and poorly with flexors at L4-L5 (ρ = -0.134) and L5-S1 (ρ = -0.227). Lumbar stiffness is dependent on modifiable (muscle atrophy) and nonmodifiable (extend of DDD) factors. This can guide nonoperative management of hip pathology, emphasizing the relevance of core muscle rehabilitation to improve posture and stiffness. Identification ≥4 DDD levels should alert surgeons of increased THA instability risk. Level of evidence: level IV, cohort series.

Periprosthetic fracture following anterior approach or dislocation after posterior approach: which one is the lesser evil?

INTRODUCTION: The most common approaches in total hip arthroplasty (THA) have different complication profiles; anterior-approach (AA-THA) has an increased risk of periprosthetic fractures (PPF); posterior-approach (PA-THA) is associated with higher dislocation risk. However, the relative severity of one versus the other is unknown. This study aims to compare outcome of patients who suffered PPF after AA-THA with those that sustained dislocation after PA-THA. METHODS: This is a retrospective, single-center, multi-surgeon, consecutive case-series of primary THA patients. In a cohort of 9867 patients who underwent THA, 79 fulfilled the approach-specific, post-operative complication criteria, of which 44 were PPF after AA-THA and 35 with dislocation after PA-THA (age 67.9 years (range: 38.0-88.1), 58.2% women). Outcome included complication- and revision- rates, and patient-reported outcomes including Oxford Hip Score (OHS). RESULTS: At 5.8 years follow-up (range: 2.0-18.5), reoperation was more common in the dislocation after PA-THA group (23/35 vs. 20/44; p = 0.072). Change of surgical approach occurred in 15/20 of patients with PPF after AA-THA, but none in those with dislocation after PA-THA. Following re-operation, complication rate was greater in the PPF group (9/20 vs. 4/23; p = 0.049). At latest follow-up, OHS were superior in the PPF after AA-THA group [42.6 (range: 25.0-48.0) vs. 36.6 (range: 21.0-47.0); p = 0.006]. CONCLUSION: Dislocation following PA-THA is more likely to require revision. However, PPF following AA-THA requires more often a different surgical approach and is at higher risk of complications. Despite the increased surgical burden post-operative PROMs are better in the peri-prosthetic fracture group, especially in cases not requiring reoperation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, case-control study.

How to Screen for Lumbar Spine Stiffness in Patients Awaiting Total Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to (1) define the prevalence of spinopelvic abnormalities among patients who have hip osteoarthritis (OA) and controls (asymptomatic volunteers) and (2) identify factors that reliably predict the presence of lumbar spine stiffness. METHODS: This is a prospective, cross-sectional, case-cohort study of patients who have end-stage primary hip OA, who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). Patients were compared with a cohort of asymptomatic volunteers, matched for age, sex, and body mass index (BMI), serving as a control group. Spinopelvic pathologies were defined as: lumbar spine flatback deformity (difference of 10 or more degrees for pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis angle), a standing sagittal pelvic tilt of 19° or more and lumbar spine stiffness (lumbar flexion of less than 20° between both postures). RESULTS: The prevalence of spinopelvic pathologies was similar between patients and controls (flatback deformity: 16% versus 10%, P = .209; standing pelvic tilt >19°: 17% versus 24%, P = .218; lumbar spine stiffness: 6% versus 5%, P = .827). Age over 65 years-old and standing lumbar lordosis angle less than 45° were associated with high sensitivity and specificity for identifying lumbar spine stiffness (age >65 years: 82% and 66%; standing lumbar lordosis angle <45°: 85% and 73%). CONCLUSION: The presence of end-stage hip osteoarthritis was not associated with increased prevalence of adverse spinopelvic characteristics compared to matched, asymptomatic volunteers. Age and LLstanding are the strongest predictors of lumbar spine flexion and can guide clinical practice on when to obtain additional radiographs for patients who have hip OA before arthroplasty to identify at-risk patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II (prospective, cohort study).

Early- to mid-term outcome of a short, cementless, titanium, flat, tapered stem for primary total hip arthroplasty: an independent series.

INTRODUCTION: This study aims to: (1) describe perioperative complications amongst patients who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) using a short cementless, titanium, flat, tapered stem; (2) estimate this stem's early- to mid-term survival; (3) identify factors associated with revision arthroplasty; and (4) describe femoral remodelling at minimum 6 years postoperatively. METHODS: A retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent THA using a Taperloc Microplasty stem (Zimmer-Biomet, Warsaw, Indiana, USA) with minimum 2-year follow-up was performed. Surgeries were performed by 1 of 6, non-designer, arthroplasty surgeons between 2014 and 2018. Outcomes included perioperative complications including revision arthroplasty, and survival. Cox analysis was used to analyse the effect of different factors on risk of revision arthroplasty. Radiographs with 6-year follow-up served to describe femoral remodelling. RESULTS: In 1205 patients, followed for 5.1 ± 1.4 years, the incidence of perioperative complication was 5.2% for which 29 patients (2.4%) required revision arthroplasty. The 5- and 7-year survival rates were 97.8% (95% CI, 96.9-98.5) and 97.0% (95% CI, 95.6-98.0), respectively. The only factor associated with revision arthroplasty was proximal femur morphology, as per Dorr classification (HR 1.24 [95%CI, 1.09-1.41]; p = 0.005). During radiographic assessment, 12% of patients showed ⩾25% of relative change in cortical thickness in Gruen zones 3 or 5. We observed calcar remodelling in 50% of radiographs while 10% showed presence of a pedestal sign. CONCLUSIONS: The 7-year survivorship of the Taperloc Microplasty stem is within National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines. Patients ⩽65 years with osteoarthritis and Dorr A/B femoral morphology may be ideal candidates for THA with this stem. Femoral remodelling is common and not associated with adverse outcome.

Prevalence of Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebral Anomalies Among Healthy Volunteers and Patients with Hip Pathology: Association with Spinopelvic Characteristics.

A lumbosacral transitional vertebra (LSTV) has been reported to be prevalent among patients with hip dysplasia. The aims of this study were to determine the (1) prevalence of an LSTV in young patients presenting with hip pain and a group of asymptomatic volunteers, (2) effect of an LSTV on spinopelvic characteristics, and (3) presence of low back pain among patients with an LSTV. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 102 patients with hip pathology and 51 asymptomatic volunteers (mean age, 33.9 ± 7.3 years; mean body mass index, 26.0 ± 5.0 kg/m2; 57.5% female). Participants underwent radiographic assessment of the lumbar spine and pelvis in standing and deep-seated positions. LSTV occurrence was classified according to the Castellvi system. Spinopelvic characteristics included lumbar lordosis (including segmental lumbar angles), pelvic tilt, and hip flexion (pelvic-femoral angle). Differences between standing and deep-seated values were calculated. Low back pain was assessed using the Oswestry Disability Index. Results: The prevalence of LSTV type ≥II was 8.5%, with no difference between patients and volunteers (p = 0.386). Individuals with an LSTV had a greater standing L1-L5 angle (mean, 51.6° ± 11.7° versus 38.9° ± 9.3°; p < 0.001). The overall spinal flexion (change in L1-S1 angle between the standing and deep-seated positions) in individuals with an LSTV was similar to that in individuals without an LSTV; restricted L5-S1 mobility was compensated for at L1-L2 (10.2° ± 5.8° in those with versus 8.4° ± 4.1° in those without an LSTV; p = 0.070). No significant difference in the presence of low back pain was found (p = 0.250). Conclusions: An LSTV was found in 8.5% of young adults, with no difference between patients with hip pathology and controls. Individuals with an LSTV have greater standing lumbar lordosis, with altered mechanics at the cephalad adjacent level, which may predispose these individuals to degenerative changes at this level. Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Delayed mobilization following admission for hip fracture is associated with increased morbidity and length of hospital stay.

BACKGROUND: Current national guidelines on caring for hip fractures recommend early mobilization. However, this recommendation does not account for time spent immobilized waiting for surgery. We sought to determine timing of mobilization following hip fracture, beginning at hospital admission, and evaluate its association with medical complications and length of hospital stay (LOS). METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of prospectively collected data for 470 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for a hip fracture between September 2019 and August 2020 at an academic, tertiary-referral hospital. Outcomes of interest included time from hospital admission to mobilization, complication rate and LOS. We used a binary regression analysis to determine the effect of different surgical and patient factors on the risk of a postoperative medical complication. RESULTS: The mean time from admission to mobilization was 2.8 ± 2.3 days (range 3 h-14 d). There were 125 (26.6%) patients who experienced at least 1 complication. The odds of developing a complication began to increase steadily once a patient waited more than 3 days from admission to mobilization (odds ratio 2.15, 95% confidence interval 1.42-3.25). Multivariate regression analysis showed that prefracture frailty (ß = 0.276, p = 0.05), and timing from hospital admission to mobilization (ß = 0.156, p < 0.001) and from surgery to mobilization (ß = 1.195, p < 0.001) were associated with complications. The mean LOS was 12.2 ± 10.7 days (range 1-90 d). Prolonged wait to mobilization was associated with longer LOS (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Comprehensive guidelines on timing of mobilization following hip fracture should account for cumulative time spent immobilized.

Acetabular Sector Angles in Asymptomatic and Dysplastic Hips: Defining Dysplasia and Thresholds to Guide Management.

BACKGROUND: Radiographic evaluation plays an important role in detecting and grading hip dysplasia. Acetabular sector angles (ASAs) measure the degree of femoral head coverage provided by the acetabulum on computed tomographic (CT) scans. In this study, we aimed to determine ASA values at different axial levels in a control cohort with asymptomatic, high-functioning hips without underlying hip pathology and a study group with symptomatic, dysplastic hips that underwent periacetabular osteotomy (PAO), thereby defining the ASA thresholds for hip dysplasia. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study evaluating a control group of 51 patients (102 hips) and a study group of 66 patients (72 hips). The control group was high-functioning and asymptomatic, with an Oxford Hip Score of >43, did not have osteoarthritis (Tönnis grade ≤1), underwent a pelvic CT scan, had a mean age (and standard deviation) of 52.1 ± 5.5 years, and was 52.9% female. The study group had symptomatic hip dysplasia treated with PAO, had a mean age of 29.5 ± 7.3 years, and 83.3% was female. Anterior ASA (AASA) and posterior ASA (PASA) were measured at 3 axial CT levels to determine equatorial, intermediate, and proximal ASA. The thresholds for dysplasia were determined using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, including the area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS: Patients with dysplasia had significantly smaller ASAs compared with the control group; the differences were most pronounced for proximal AASAs and proximal and intermediate PASAs. The control group had a mean proximal PASA of 162° ± 17°, yielding a threshold for dysplasia of 137° (AUC, 0.908). The mean intermediate PASA for the control group was 117° ± 11°, yielding a threshold of 107° (AUC, 0.904). The threshold for anterior dysplasia was 133° for proximal AASA (AUC, 0.859) and 57° for equatorial AASA (AUC, 0.868). The threshold for posterior dysplasia was 102° for intermediate PASA (AUC, 0.933). CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of ASA is a reliable tool to identify focal acetabular deficiency with high accuracy, aiding diagnosis and management. A proximal PASA of <137° or an intermediate PASA of <107° should alert clinicians to the presence of dysplasia. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Spinopelvic challenges in primary total hip arthroplasty.

There is no universal safe zone for cup orientation. Patients with spinal arthrodesis or a degenerative lumbar spine are at increased risk of dislocation. The relative contributions of the hip (femur and acetabulum) and of the spine (lumbar spine) in body motion must be considered together. The pelvis links the two and influences both acetabular orientation (i.e. hip flexion/extension) and sagittal balance/lumbar lordosis (i.e. spine flexion/extension). Examination of the spino-pelvic motion can be done through clinical examination and standard radiographs or stereographic imaging. A single, lateral, standing spinopelvic radiograph would be able to providemost relevant information required for screening and pre-operative planning. A significant variability in static and dynamic spinopelvic characteristics exists amongst healthy volunteers without known spinal or hip pathology. The stiff, arthritic, hip leads to greater changes in pelvic tilt (changes are almost doubled), with associated obligatory change in lumbar lordosis to maintain upright posture (lumbar lordosis is reduced to counterbalance for the reduction in sacral slope). Following total hip arthroplasty and restoration of hip flexion, spinopelvic characteristics tend to change/normalize (to age-matched healthy volunteers). The static spinopelvic parameters that are directly associated with increased risk of dislocation are lumbo-pelvic mismatch (pelvic incidence - lumbar lordosis angle >10°), high pelvic tilt (>19°), and low sacral slope when standing. A high combined sagittal index (CSI) when standing (>245°) is associated with increased risk of anterior instability, whilst low CSI when standing (<205°) is associated with increased risk of posterior instability. Aiming to achieve an optimum CSI when standing within 205-245° (with narrower target for those with spinal disease) whilst ensuring the coronal targets of cup orientation targets are achieved (inclination/version of 40/20 ±10°) is our preferred method.