Selective Targeting of Myoblast Fusogenic Signaling and Differentiation-Arrest Antagonizes Rhabdomyosarcoma Cells.

Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is an aggressive soft tissue malignancy comprised histologically of skeletal muscle lineage precursors that fail to exit the cell cycle and fuse into differentiated syncytial muscle-for which the underlying pathogenetic mechanisms remain unclear. In contrast to myogenic transcription factor signaling, the molecular machinery that orchestrates the discrete process of myoblast fusion in mammals is poorly understood and unexplored in RMS. The fusogenic machinery in Drosophila, however, is understood in much greater detail, where myoblasts are divided into two distinct pools, founder cells (FC) and fusion competent myoblasts (fcm). Fusion is heterotypic and only occurs between FCs and fcms. Here, we interrogated a comprehensive RNA-sequencing database and found that human RMS diffusely demonstrates an FC lineage gene signature, revealing that RMS is a disease of FC lineage rhabdomyoblasts. We next exploited our Drosophila RMS-related model to isolate druggable FC-specific fusogenic elements underlying RMS, which uncovered the EGFR pathway. Using RMS cells, we showed that EGFR inhibitors successfully antagonized RMS RD cells, whereas other cell lines were resistant. EGFR inhibitor-sensitive cells exhibited decreased activation of the EGFR intracellular effector Akt, whereas Akt activity remained unchanged in inhibitor-resistant cells. We then demonstrated that Akt inhibition antagonizes RMS-including RMS resistant to EGFR inhibition-and that sustained activity of the Akt1 isoform preferentially blocks rhabdomyoblast differentiation potential in cell culture and in vivo. These findings point towards selective targeting of fusion- and differentiation-arrest via Akt as a broad RMS therapeutic vulnerability. SIGNIFICANCE: EGFR and its downstream signaling mediator AKT1 play a role in the fusion and differentiation processes of rhabdomyosarcoma cells, representing a therapeutic vulnerability of rhabdomyosarcoma.

α4-integrin deficiency in B cells does not affect disease in a T-cell-mediated EAE disease model.

Objective: The goal of this study was to investigate the role of CD 19+ B cells within the brain and spinal cord during CNS autoimmunity in a peptide-induced, primarily T-cell-mediated experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) model of MS. We hypothesized that CD19+ B cells outside the CNS drive inflammation in EAE. Methods: We generated CD19.Cre+/- α4-integrinfl/fl mice. EAE was induced by active immunization with myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein peptide (MOGp35-55). Multiparameter flow cytometry was used to phenotype leukocyte subsets in primary and secondary lymphoid organs and the CNS. Serum cytokine levels and Ig levels were assessed by bead array. B-cell adoptive transfer was used to determine the compartment-specific pathogenic role of antigen-specific and non-antigen-specific B cells. Results: A genetic ablation of α4-integrin in CD19+/- B cells significantly reduced the number of CD19+ B cells in the CNS but does not affect EAE disease activity in active MOGp35-55-induced disease. The composition of B-cell subsets in the brain, primary lymphoid organs, and secondary lymphoid organs of CD19.Cre+/- α4-integrinfl/fl mice was unchanged during MOGp35-55-induced EAE. Adoptive transfer of purified CD19+ B cells from CD19.Cre+/- α4-integrinfl/fl mice or C57BL/6 wild-type (WT) control mice immunized with recombinant rMOG1-125 or ovalbumin323-339 into MOGp35-55-immunized CD19.Cre+/- α4-integrinfl/fl mice caused worse clinical EAE than was observed in MOGp35-55-immunized C57BL/6 WT control mice that did not receive adoptively transferred CD19+ B cells. Conclusions: Observations made in CD19.Cre+/- α4-integrinfl/fl mice in active MOGp35-55-induced EAE suggest a compartment-specific pathogenic role of CD19+ B cells mostly outside of the CNS that is not necessarily antigen specific.