Assuntos
Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/diagnóstico , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos , Hipersensibilidade Tardia/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidade Imediata/diagnóstico , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/etiologia , Feminino , Finlândia , Hospitais Universitários , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Testes Cutâneos/métodos , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
We performed a cost-effective evaluation of cyclosporin A versus UVAB phototherapy in the treatment of severe atopic dermatitis. The analysis was based on a one-year open prospective clinical trial conducted in Finland and showed that patients who received intermittent cyclosporin A therapy had on average 191 remission days per year, i.e. where disease activity was reduced by 50% or more. Patients receiving UVAB phototherapy had on average 123 remission days per year. All costs were estimated for the one-year period. Health service utilization of the 2 treatment groups was estimated based on the data gathered during the clinical study. Total costs were USD 5,438 in the cyclosporin A group and USD 5,635 in the UVAB group. Direct health-care costs were USD 4,935 in the cyclosporin A group and USD 3,124 in the UVAB group. The cost of a remission day was USD 28 in the cyclosporin A group and USD 46 in the UVAB group. In terms of direct health-care costs, the cost of a remission day was USD 26 in the cyclosporin A group and USD 25 in the UVAB group. Our results demonstrate that cyclosporin A therapy is similarly cost-effective as UVAB phototherapy in terms of total cost in the treatment of atopic dermatitis unresponsive to topical treatment. In terms of direct health-care costs, i.e. treatment and health services utilization costs, however, UVAB is significantly less costly, but side effects are frequent.
Assuntos
Ciclosporina/economia , Dermatite Atópica/tratamento farmacológico , Dermatite Atópica/radioterapia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Terapia Ultravioleta/economia , Adulto , Idoso , Intervalos de Confiança , Redução de Custos , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Análise Custo-Benefício , Ciclosporina/uso terapêutico , Atenção à Saúde/economia , Atenção à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Dermatite Atópica/diagnóstico , Dermatite Atópica/economia , Feminino , Finlândia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Probabilidade , Medição de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do Tratamento , Terapia Ultravioleta/métodos , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Hemorrhage from the pancreatic duct, i.e. hemosuccus pancreaticus (HP), is a rare cause of gastrointestinal bleeding. This potentially life-threatening complication of chronic pancreatitis may pose a significant diagnostic and therapeutic dilemma, especially in patients with silent forms of the disease. METHODS: We report a case of a 64-year-old man with no history or symptoms but positive findings of chronic calcifying pancreatitis at computed tomography (CT) scan. RESULTS: The patient presented with repeated episodes of gastrointestinal bleeding requiring transfusion and did not, until later in the disease, develop hyperamylasemia and epigastric pain. Repeated endoscopies could not reveal the source of bleeding. The radiological diagnosis and successful transcatheter embolization of a small splenic pseudoaneurysm were performed during an interval when the patient was asymptomatic and showed no signs of bleeding. CONCLUSION: We suggest that when HP is suspected, a contrast-enhanced CT angiography with reconstruction of the arteries should be performed regardless of whether the patient shows signs of active bleeding or not.
Assuntos
Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/diagnóstico , Hemorragia/diagnóstico , Pancreatopatias/diagnóstico , Ductos Pancreáticos , Pancreatite/complicações , Amilases/sangue , Transfusão de Sangue , Doença Crônica , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/etiologia , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/terapia , Hemorragia/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dor , Pancreatopatias/terapia , Pancreatite/diagnóstico , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios XRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The standard polypropylene mesh used in Lichtenstein's operation induces a strong foreign-tissue reaction with potentially harmful effects. A mesh with less polypropylene could possibly be beneficial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Six hundred men with inguinal hernias were randomized to Lichtenstein's operation with Prolene or Vypro II in a single-blinded multicenter trial. The randomization was performed by a computer algorithm in a database through the Internet. All data were entered and directly validated in the database through the Internet. RESULTS: The meshes had comparable results in return to work, return to daily activities, complications, postoperative pain, and quality of life during the first 8 weeks of rehabilitation. CONCLUSIONS: Lichtenstein's operation with either Prolene or Vypro II is safe and well tolerated with an acceptable postoperative rehabilitation time and a high quality of life 2 months after surgery. The study was facilitated by the use of a database through the Internet.
Assuntos
Hérnia Inguinal/cirurgia , Poliglactina 910 , Polipropilenos , Telas Cirúrgicas , Adulto , Idoso , Humanos , Internet , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Qualidade de Vida , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto/métodos , Método Simples-CegoRESUMO
We evaluated the outcome of both realtime teleconsultations and face-to-face consultations in dermatology. Forty-six patients were enrolled in an open controlled study. Twenty-nine patients (60%) answered the questionnaire sent to them after six months. Over the six-month follow-up, similar proportions of the two patient groups had visited a general practitioner or a specialist in the consulting hospital. At follow-up, overall patient satisfaction with the consultation, measured on a linear analogue scale (0-10), had fallen only slightly and to the same extent after both types of consultation, that is by 1.2 (SD 3.7) after realtime teleconsultations and by 1.4 (SD 4.5) after face-to-face consultations. The proportions of patients who would prefer the same mode of consultation for their next appointment had decreased from 83% to 50% in the realtime teleconsultation group and from 83% to 62% in the face-to-face consultation group. However, in neither group was the change significant. The study suggests that patient satisfaction with teleconsultation is well preserved after six months.
Assuntos
Satisfação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Consulta Remota , Dermatopatias/diagnóstico , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estatísticas não ParamétricasRESUMO
Eczema in childhood is almost always atopic eczema, a common disease with huge impact on the quality of life of the child and family. Although atopic eczema constitutes part of the atopic syndrome, avoidance of allergens is never enough for disease control. Treatment of eczema in childhood has the same components as in adults. Emollients constitute the preventive background therapy in all stages of eczema, and topical corticosteroids are still the mainstay of treatment. Infectious exacerbation may require the use of a short course of topical or systemic antimicrobials. UV phototherapy should be considered as an adjunctive treatment to assist topical corticosteroids after an acute exacerbation of the disease. Cyclosporine can also be used in the treatment of childhood eczema in severe cases. Maternal allergen avoidance for disease prevention, oral antihistamines, Chinese herbs, dietary restriction in established atopic eczema, homeopathy, house-dust mite reduction, massage therapy, hypnotherapy, evening primrose oil, emollients, and topical coal tar are other temporarily used treatment modalities, without, however, firm evidence of efficacy from proper controlled trials. Calcineurin inhibitors constitute a new generation of drugs for both adult and childhood eczema already marketed in some countries. It is postulated that they will replace topical corticosteroids as first-line treatment of eczema.