Burden of Medically Attended Diarrhea and Outpatient Clostridioides difficile Infection Among Persons in 2 Large Integrated Healthcare Settings, 2016-2021.

Background: Identification of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) in the community setting is increasing. We describe testing for CDI among patients with medically attended diarrhea (MAD) in the outpatient setting, and the incidence of outpatient CDI. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study among members ≥18 years of age from Kaiser Permanente Southern California and Kaiser Permanente Northwest from 1 January 2016 through 31 December 2021. MAD was identified by outpatient diarrheal International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision diagnosis codes, and CDI through positive laboratory results. Outpatient CDI was defined by no hospitalization ≤7 days after specimen collection. Incidence rates (IRs) of outpatient CDI were stratified by select demographic and clinical variables. Outpatient CDI burden 12 months following index date was measured by CDI-associated healthcare visits, and CDI testing and treatment. Results: We identified 777 533 MAD episodes; 12.1% (93 964/777 533) were tested for CDI. Of those tested, 10.8% (10 110/93 964) were positive. Outpatient CDI IR was 51.0 (95% confidence interval [CI], 49.8-52.2) per 100 000 person-years, decreasing from 58.2 (95% CI, 55.7-60.7) in 2016 to 45.7 (95% CI, 43.7-47.8) in 2021. Approximately 44% (n = 4200) received an antibiotic 30 days prior to index date and 84.1% (n = 8006) CDIs were "community-associated" (no hospitalizations 12 weeks prior to index date). Of outpatient CDIs, 6.7% (n = 526) had a CDI-associated hospitalization ≤12 months. Conclusions: There was a high incidence of outpatient CDI despite infrequent CDI testing among patients with MAD. The majority of those with outpatient CDI had no recent antibiotic use and no recent hospitalization. Further studies are needed to understand the source and management of medically attended outpatient CDI.

Trends in firearm injury in a southern California health care system from 2010 to 2020.

BACKGROUND: Firearm injury is a significant public health concern in the United States. METHODS: Data on fatal and nonfatal firearm injuries were obtained from a cohort of N = 7,473,650 members of Kaiser Permanente Southern California, a large integrated healthcare system between 2010 and 2020. Age-adjusted rates of combined fatal and nonfatal firearm injury per 100,000 members were calculated by year, with the 2010 US census as the reference population. Trends were evaluated using Poisson or negative binomial regression. RESULTS: There was an increasing trend in overall firearm injuries between 2010 and 2020 among adults in this large integrated healthcare system (p < .0001), primarily driven by non-self-inflicted firearm injuries (p < .0001). Self-inflicted injuries decreased during this time (p = .01). Injuries among youth showed no significant change. CONCLUSION: There was an increasing trend in firearm injuries between 2010 and 2020 among adults in this large integrated healthcare system, primarily driven by non-self-inflicted firearm injuries; however, self-inflicted injuries decreased during this time. Injuries among youth showed no significant change.

Transgender Care Experiences, Barriers, and Recommendations for Improvement in a Large Integrated Health Care System in the United States.

Purpose: Transgender individuals who pursue gender affirmation medical procedures often need to navigate a complex health system and interact with multiple health care providers in primary and specialty care. We sought to better understand patient, provider, and system level barriers to transgender care in a large integrated health care system in California. Methods: Three 90-min focus groups were conducted with 13 transgender individuals who received specialty care between April and August 2018 in Kaiser Permanente Southern California. Results: Participants cited common adversities such as misgendering and system-wide insensitivity during health care encounters and low levels of understanding of their transgender experience among primary care providers. Provider-patient relationship improvements were recommended for pre- and postsurgical care and service-provider sensitivity training. Suggestions include better care coordination, reducing redundancy in clearance for specialty care services, and enhancing patient support for navigation of gender affirmation services. Participants requested careful consideration when implementing systemwide routine processes such as using pronouns and names when calling patients in for visits or describing procedures on service invoices. Conclusions: Education and training programs for improving transgender care competency and enhancing care coordination between primary care and specialty care for transgender patients are warranted. Including transgender voices with lived-experience as active stakeholders in ongoing efforts such as community advisory boards to identify care gaps may facilitate patient-centered and culturally sensitive transgender care and increased patient satisfaction. Policy Implications: There is a need for systematic training for transgender care competent providers and enhancement of care coordination between primary care and specialty care.

Suicide-related care among patients who have experienced an opioid-involved overdose.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to describe suicide prevention care for individuals prescribed opioids or with opioid use disorder (OUD) and identify opportunities for improving this care. METHODS: Adult patients (n = 65) from four health systems with an opioid-involved overdose and clinicians (n = 21) who had contact with similar patients completed 30-60-min semi-structured interviews. A community advisory board contributed to development of all procedures, and interpretation and summary of findings. RESULTS: Patients were mostly female (59%), White (63%) and non-Hispanic (77%); 52 were prescribed opioids, 49% had diagnosed OUD, and 42% experienced an intentional opioid-involved overdose. Findings included: 1) when prescribed an opioid or treated for OUD, suicide risks were typically not discussed; 2) 35% of those with an intentional opioid-involved overdose and over 80% with an unintentional overdose reported no discussion of suicidal ideation when treated for the overdose; and 3) suicide-related follow-up care was uncommon among those with unintentional overdoses despite suicidal ideation being reported by >20%. Clinicians reported that when prescribing opioids or treating OUD, post-overdose suicide-related screening or counseling was not done routinely. CONCLUSIONS: There were several opportunities to tailor suicide prevention care for patients who were treated for opioid-involved overdoses within health systems.

Chronic and Sustained High-Dose Opioid Use in an Integrated Health System.

INTRODUCTION: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain released in 2016 had led to decreases in opioid prescribing. This study sought to examine chronic and sustained high-dose prescription opioid use in an integrated health system. METHODS: A serial cross-sectional study was conducted in 2021 to estimate the annual age-adjusted prevalence and incidence of chronic and high-dose opioid use among demographically diverse noncancer adults in an integrated health system in Southern California during 2013-2020. Interrupted time-series analysis with segmented regression was conducted to estimate changes in the trends in annual rates before (2013-2015) and after (2017-2020) the 2016 guideline, treating 2016 as a wash-out period. RESULTS: Prevalence and incidence of chronic use and sustained high-dose use had started to decrease after a health system intervention program before the 2016 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guideline release and continued to decline after the guideline. Among those with sustained high-dose use, there was a substantial decrease in persons with an average daily dosage ≥90 morphine milligram equivalent and concurrent benzodiazepine use. An accelerated decrease in prevalent chronic use after the guideline was observed (slope change: -11.1 [95% CI= -20.3, -1.9] users/10,000 person-years, p=0.03). The incidence of chronic use and sustained high-dose use continued to decrease after the guideline release but at a slower pace. CONCLUSIONS: Implementing evidence-based prescribing guidelines was associated with a decrease in chronic and sustained high-dose prescription opioid use.

Factors Associated With Firearm Injury Among Pediatric Members of a Large Integrated Healthcare System.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Few studies have tested multiple socio-ecological risk factors assocated with firearm injury among pediatric populations and distinguished self-inflicted from non-self-inflicted injury. To address this gap, the current study examined demographic, individual psychosocial, and neighborhood variables as risk factors for firearm injury among a large cohort of children and adolescents. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study. Data were obtained from the electronic health records of a large integrated healthcare system. The cohort included children <18 years with at least one clinical encounter between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2018. Poisson regression was used to examine demographic (age, gender, race and ethnicity, Medicaid status), psychosocial (depression, substance use disorder, medical comorbidities), and neighborhood education variables as potential risk factors for non-self-inflicted and self-inflicted firearm injuries. RESULTS: For non-self-inflicted injury, the highest relative risk was found for children age 12-17 years old compared to 0-5 year olds (RR = 37.57); other risk factors included male gender, Black and Hispanic race and ethnicity (compared to White race), being a Medicaid recipient, lower neighborhood education, and substance use disorder diagnosis. For self-inflicted injury, only age 12-17 years old and male gender were associated with increased risk. CONCLUSIONS: These results reinforce the established higher risk for firearm injury among adolescent males, highlight differences between self-inflicted and non-self-inflicted injuries, and the need to consider demographic, psychosocial, and neighborhood variables as risk factors to inform interventions aimed to reduce firearm injuries among children and adolescents.

Sex Differences in Comorbid Mental and Substance Use Disorders Among Primary Care Patients With Opioid Use Disorder.

OBJECTIVE: The authors sought to characterize the 3-year prevalence of mental disorders and nonnicotine substance use disorders among male and female primary care patients with documented opioid use disorder across large U.S. health systems. METHODS: This retrospective study used 2014-2016 data from patients ages ≥16 years in six health systems. Diagnoses were obtained from electronic health records or claims data; opioid use disorder treatment with buprenorphine or injectable extended-release naltrexone was determined through prescription and procedure data. Adjusted prevalence of comorbid conditions among patients with opioid use disorder (with or without treatment), stratified by sex, was estimated by fitting logistic regression models for each condition and applying marginal standardization. RESULTS: Females (53.2%, N=7,431) and males (46.8%, N=6,548) had a similar prevalence of opioid use disorder. Comorbid mental disorders among those with opioid use disorder were more prevalent among females (86.4% vs. 74.3%, respectively), whereas comorbid other substance use disorders (excluding nicotine) were more common among males (51.9% vs. 60.9%, respectively). These differences held for those receiving medication treatment for opioid use disorder, with mental disorders being more common among treated females (83% vs. 71%) and other substance use disorders more common among treated males (68% vs. 63%). Among patients with a single mental health condition comorbid with opioid use disorder, females were less likely than males to receive medication treatment for opioid use disorder (15% vs. 20%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The high rate of comorbid conditions among patients with opioid use disorder indicates a strong need to supply primary care providers with adequate resources for integrated opioid use disorder treatment.

Sexually Transmitted Infections Among Men and Transgender Women Using HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis in a Large Integrated Health System-A Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are common in people using pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). We examined risk and factors associated with STIs in a cohort of PrEP users in an integrated health system in the United States. SETTING: The Kaiser Permanente Southern California is a large integrated health system that provides comprehensive medical services to approximately 4.7 million demographically diverse members. METHODS: We identified men and transgender women initiating PrEP between January 1, 2014, and June 1, 2018, and followed through December 31, 2018. Demographic and clinical factors potentially associated with the risk of bacterial STIs during PrEP use were evaluated using Poisson regression models. RESULTS: Among 5042 individuals tested for STIs with 7198 person-years of follow-up, 1709 (33.9%) had at least one new STI. The estimated incidence of STIs was 48.3 per 100 person-years, and the most common STI was rectal chlamydia. Most repeat STIs (61.4%) occurred <180 days apart. In a multivariable analysis, an history of STIs in the prior 6 months through 7 days after the PrEP initiation was the most prominent risk factor of STIs during PrEP use (adjusted risk ratio: 1.78, 95% confidence intervals: 1.65 to 1.93). Other risk factors included younger age (<35 years), being Hispanic, and having a history of alcohol use disorder or drug use disorder. CONCLUSIONS: Quarterly STI testing and targeted intervention to mitigate STI risk are warranted for young and racial minority PrEP users, particularly for those with prior history of STIs and substance use disorders.

Identifying Suicidal Ideation and Attempt From Clinical Notes Within a Large Integrated Health Care System.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to develop a natural language processing algorithm to identify suicidal ideation/attempt from free-text clinical notes. METHODS: Clinical notes containing prespecified keywords related to suicidal ideation/attempts from 2010 to 2018 were extracted from our organization's electronic health record system. A random sample of 864 clinical notes was selected and equally divided into 4 subsets. These subsets were reviewed and classified as 1 of the following 3 suicidal ideation/attempt categories (current, historical, and no) by experienced research chart abstractors. The first 3 data sets were used to develop the rule-based computerized algorithm sequentially and the fourth data set was used to evaluate the algorithm's performance. The validated algorithm was then applied to the entire study sample of clinical notes. RESULTS: The computerized algorithm correctly identified 23 of the 26 confirmed current suicidal ideation/attempts and all 10 confirmed historical suicidal ideation/attempts in the validation data set. It produced an 88.5% sensitivity and a 100.0% positive predictive value for current suicidal ideation/attempts, and a 100.0% sensitivity and positive predictive value for historical suicidal ideation/attempts. After applying the computerized algorithm to the entire set of study notes, we identified a total of 1,050,287 current ideation/attempt events and 293,037 historical ideation/attempt events documented in clinical notes. Those for which current ideation/attempt events were documented were more likely to be female (59.5%), 25-44 years old (28.3%), and White (43.4%). CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated that a computerized algorithm can effectively identify suicidal ideation/attempts from clinical notes. This algorithm can be utilized in support of suicide prevention research programs and patient care quality improvement initiatives.

Barriers and Opportunities to Improve the Implementation of Patient Screening and Linkage to Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis in Primary Care.

Although pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is highly effective at preventing HIV infection, only around 25% of at-risk individuals in the United States have accessed a prescription. One way to increase PrEP uptake is through the sexual health screening of patients and linkage to PrEP in primary care settings. The objective of this analysis was to assess the barriers and implementation strategies during a screening and linkage to PrEP pilot intervention. Primary care patients were screened for PrEP indication during routine primary care visits. Of the 1,225 individuals screened, 1.8% (n=22) were eligible for PrEP and from those, 77.3% (n=17) attended the specialist appointment and were prescribed PrEP. Primary care patients (n=30) and providers (n=8) then participated in semi-structured interviews assessing their experience with the pilot intervention. Using an applied thematic analytic approach, patients and providers identified barriers and related improvement strategies that could be classified into four main categories: 1) Financial Barriers: Individual- vs. Clinic-level Considerations 2) The Role of Stigma, Discomfort, and Cultural Factors 3) Logistical Hurdles and Streamlining the Intervention, and 4) The Lack of PrEP Knowledge and the Need for Education. Findings support the accepatability and feasibility of screening for PrEP in primary care along with appropriate implementation strategies. This study suggests that because of the high volume of patients seen in primary care, sexual health screenings and linkage to PrEP interventions have the potential to reduce new incident HIV infections among diverse sexual minority men.

Referral Linkage to Preexposure Prophylaxis Care and Persistence on Preexposure Prophylaxis in an Integrated Health Care System.

BACKGROUND: Successful linkage to preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and retention in care are important for HIV prevention. We examined gaps in PrEP care following referral and factors associated with PrEP linkage and persistence in an integrated health care system in the United States. METHODS: We identified individuals referred for PrEP from 2014 to 2017 at the Kaiser Permanente Southern California using electronic health records and assessed linkage to care, PrEP prescription orders and fills, and PrEP persistence (medication possession ratio ≥80%) in the year after the first fill. We evaluated demographic and clinical factors potentially associated with PrEP linkage and persistence using a series of multivariable modified Poisson regression models. RESULTS: Of 2995 referred individuals, 74.9% were linked to PrEP care. Nearly all those linked to care were prescribed PrEP and filled a prescription, but only 47.4% of those who filled a prescription were persistent on PrEP. Individuals aged <25 years (vs ≥25 years), female subjects (vs males), and individuals with high-deductible insurance (vs no high deductible) were less likely to be linked to care. Individuals aged <25 years and Hispanics (vs non-Hispanic whites) were less likely to be persistent. Those with alcohol use disorder were more likely to be linked to PrEP care but less likely to be persistent. New HIV diagnoses occurred in 38 individuals, and only 1 had PrEP in possession at diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: We observed PrEP care gaps and disparities among individuals referred for PrEP. Patient-centered interventions are needed in primary care to address barriers to successful PrEP linkage and persistence.

Project SLIP: Implementation of a PrEP Screening and Linkage Intervention in Primary Care.

Nearly a decade after becoming formally available in the U.S., HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) remains underutilized by populations at risk for HIV acquisition. The next generation of PrEP research is pivoting toward implementation research in order to identify the most impactful avenues for scaling up PrEP uptake. Rapid identification of patients who may be at risk for HIV in primary care settings and the ability to provide brief consultation and prescription or referral for PrEP could help to increase PrEP uptake. The current study aimed to develop and pilot-test a PrEP screening instrument that could be integrated into the workflow of busy primary care clinics to help facilitate PrEP uptake among at-risk men. During the study, PrEP screening occurred for 12 months in two primary care clinics nested within a large integrated healthcare delivery system in Southern California. An interrupted time series analysis found a significant increase in PrEP referrals overall during the screening intervention period as compared to the preceding 12 months. Findings suggest that brief HIV risk screening in primary care is acceptable, feasible, and shows preliminary effects in increasing PrEP referral rates for Black and Hispanic/Latinx men.

RESUMEN: Casi una década después de estar disponible formalmente en los EE.UU., la profilaxis previa a la exposición al VIH (PrEP) sigue siendo subutilizada por las poblaciones en riesgo de contraer VIH. La próxima generación de investigación de PrEP está girando hacia la investigación de implementación con el fin de identificar las vías de mayor impacto para ampliar el consumo de PrEP. La identificación rápida de los pacientes que pueden estar en riesgo de contraer VIH en entornos de atención primaria y la capacidad de proporcionar una consulta breve y prescripción o referencia para PrEP podría ayudar a aumentar el consumo de PrEP. El estudio actual tuvo como objetivo desarrollar y probar un instrumento de detección de PrEP que podría integrarse en el flujo de trabajo de las clínicas de atención primarias concurridas para ayudar a facilitar el consumo de PrEP entre los hombres en riesgo. Durante el estudio, la detección de PrEP se realizó durante 12 meses en dos clínicas de atención primaria ubicadas dentro de un gran sistema integrado de prestación de atención médica en el sur de California. Un análisis de series de tiempo interrumpido encontró un aumento significativo en las referencias de PrEP en general durante el periodo de intervención de detección en comparación con los 12 meses anteriores. Los hallazgos sugieren que la detección breve del riesgo de VIH en la atención primara es aceptable, factible y muestra efectos preliminares en el aumento de las tasas de referencia de PrEP para hombres negros e hispanos/latinos.

Impact of an electronic medical record reminder on hepatitis B vaccine initiation and completion rates among insured adults with diabetes mellitus.

OBJECTIVE: The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommends Hepatitis B (HepB) vaccine for previously unvaccinated adults <60 years with diabetes mellitus. This observational retrospective cohort study assessed the impact of implementing electronic provider reminders on HepB vaccine initiation and 3-dose series completion rates among insured adults with diabetes aged 19-59 years old. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Difference-in-difference (DID) analyses compared changes in vaccine initiation and completion rates (ratio of the rate ratio [RRR] and 95% confidence interval [CI]) during 12 months pre- and post-implementation between intervention and control sites. We examined trends in vaccine initiation and completion rates by plotting monthly rates during the study period. We also calculated the overall HepB vaccine coverage rates with 95% CI among all adults with diabetes aged 19-59 years old at the start and end date of the study period. RESULTS: Baseline HepB vaccine initiation and completion rates were similar at both the intervention and control sites. Gender, age, and race/ethnicity distributions within both sites were similar during the 12 months pre- and post-implementation. DID analyses demonstrated statistically significant differences in the changes of the annual vaccine initiation rates (RRR: 70.7, 95% CI: 62.8-79.6) and the third dose completion rates (RRR = 18.7, 95% CI: 14.2-24.8) between the two sites. The coverage increased significantly at the intervention site while it remained low at the control site. CONCLUSIONS: Use of provider reminders is highly effective in increasing both HepB vaccine initiation and series completion rates among adults with diabetes.

Trends in Lipid Screening Among Adults in an Integrated Health Care Delivery System, 2009-2015.

BACKGROUND: Lipid screening determines eligibility for statins and other cardiovascular risk reduction interventions. OBJECTIVE: To examine trends in lipid screening among adults aged ≥20 years in a large, multiethnic, integrated health care delivery system in southern California. METHODS: Temporal trends in lipid screening were examined from 2009 to 2015 with an index date of September 30 of each year. Lipid screening was defined as the proportion of eligible members each year who (a) had ever been screened among those aged 20-39 years and (b) had been screened in the previous 6 years for those aged ≥ 40 years. Trends were analyzed by age, gender, and the presence of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or diabetes without ASCVD status. RESULTS: More than 2 million individuals were included each year: 5%-6% had ASCVD (includes those with diabetes), 7%-8% had diabetes without ASCVD, and 87% had neither condition. Among the entire population, lipid screening increased from 79.8% in 2009 to 82.6% in 2015 (P < 0.0001). Among those with ASCVD or diabetes, lipid screening was 99% across all years. Among those without ASCVD or DM, screening increased from 76.9% in 2009 to 80.0% in 2015 (P < 0.0001), with higher screening among women compared with men and lower screening among individuals younger than 55 years. CONCLUSIONS: Consistently high rates of lipid screening were observed among individuals with ASCVD or diabetes. In individuals without these conditions, screening increased over time. However, there is room to further increase screening rates in adults younger than 55 years. DISCLOSURES: This manuscript and research work was supported by a contractual agreement between the Southern California Permanente Medical Group and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals and Sanofi U.S. Researchers from Regeneron and Sanofi collaborated on the study design, interpretation of data, and writing of the manuscript. Ling Grant, Harrison, Chang, Hsu, Cheetham, Wei, and Reynolds are employed by Kaiser Permanente Southern California. Scott is employed by Southern California Permanente Medical Group. Boklage is employed by Regeneron, and Romo-LeTourneau is employed by Sanofi. Preliminary results from this study were presented at the American Heart Association Scientific Sessions; November 12-16, 2016; New Orleans, LA.

Trends in Statin Use 2009-2015 in a Large Integrated Health System: Pre- and Post-2013 ACC/AHA Guideline on Treatment of Blood Cholesterol.

PURPOSE: Implementation of the 2013 ACC/AHA cholesterol treatment guideline is likely to vary by statin benefit group. The aim of this study was to document trends in statin use before and after introduction of the ACC/AHA guideline. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study with annual cohorts from 2009 to 2015 among members of Kaiser Permanente Southern California aged ≥ 21 years. Members were categorized into four mutually exclusive statin benefit groups: atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), LDL-C ≥ 190 mg/dL in the last year, diabetes (aged 40-75 years), and 10-year ASCVD risk ≥ 7.5% (aged 40-75 years). RESULTS: The cohorts ranged from 1,993,755 members in 2009 to 2,440,429 in 2015. Approximately 5% of patients had ASCVD, 1% had LDL-C ≥ 190 mg/dL, 6% had diabetes, and 10% had a 10-year ASCVD risk ≥ 7.5% each year. Trends in statin use were stable for adults with ASCVD (2009 78%; 2015 80%), recent LDL-C ≥ 190 mg/dL (2009 45%; 2015 44%), and diabetes (2009 74%; 2015 73%), but increased for patients with 10-year ASCVD risk ≥ 7.5% (2009 36%; 2015 47%). High-intensity statin use also increased 142% and 54% among patients with LDL-C ≥ 190 mg/dL and those with ASCVD ≤ 75 years of age, respectively. Moderate-to-high intensity statin utilization increased over 50% among those with a 10-year ASCVD risk ≥ 7.5%. CONCLUSIONS: Statin use increased substantially among patients with 10-year ASCVD risk ≥ 7.5% and use of appropriate statin dosage increased in each of the four statin benefit groups between 2009 and 2015; however, there is room for improvement.

Acceptability of Virtual Prenatal Visits for Women with Gestational Diabetes.

INTRODUCTION: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is one of the most common complications of pregnancy. Current approaches to GDM management and education are labor intensive and costly. Telemedicine offers a potential solution to reduce the time and cost burden of prenatal care for women with GDM. METHODS: We assessed the acceptability of a telemedicine intervention to transmit patients' weight, blood pressure, and blood glucose measurements from wireless devices to health care providers, and to alternate "virtual office visits" with office-based prenatal visits. We administered surveys to 70 Kaiser Permanente Southern California members with GDM to assess preferences for modalities of GDM care delivery and to understand perceptions of telemedicine. We subsequently conducted 10 qualitative interviews among women with GDM to elicit perceptions about confidence and comfort with receiving care telephonically and safety concerns. Data were coded and categorized using analytic induction. RESULTS: Training on these devices would increase participants' confidence in using the equipment. Continuity of care was perceived as an important factor in facilitating confidence with near universal preference for having virtual visits with the same clinician. Most participants were not concerned with the safety of their baby or themselves during the weeks without an office visit. One participant expressed an unwillingness to participate in the intervention because of a perceived association between having a high-risk pregnancy and an increased risk of pregnancy loss. CONCLUSIONS: As telemedicine becomes increasingly common in health care, feedback from end users will be essential in tailoring, communicating about, and supporting the uptake and success of such programs.