Psychological Screening, Standards and Spinal Cord Injury: Introducing Change in NHS England Commissioned Services.

Psychologist resourcing across the United Kingdom (UK) spinal cord injury centres (SCICs) varies considerably, which has detrimentally impacted standardising service provision for people with spinal cord injuries/disorders (PwSCI/D) compared with other nations. This paper presents the outcome of a project involving the Spinal Cord Injury Psychology Advisory Group (SCIPAG) and NHS England Clinical Reference Group/SCI transformation groups to agree upon screening and standards and shares data from the National Spinal Injuries Centre (NSIC) and the Yorkshire and Midlands Regional SCICs. Inpatients completed the GAD-7, the PHQ-9, and the short form of the Appraisals of DisAbility: Primary and Secondary Scale (ADAPSSsf), assessing adjustment. A total of 646 participants were included, with 43% scoring above the clinical threshold on at least one of the measures on admission. A subset of 272 participants also completed discharge measures and 42% remained above the threshold on discharge, demonstrating sustained psychological need. This paper provides support for services to move to a screen-and-assessment model supplemented by referral options for those with changing needs or who present with difficulties outside the remit of screening. The findings also support the efficacy of universal screening across the system and consideration of screening and standards for psychological care by the wider psychology community.

Anxiety in Response to Sustaining Spinal Cord Injuries and Disorders: When Should Clinicians Be Concerned?

OBJECTIVE: To recommend a cut-off score for the brief 2-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-2) measure for persons with spinal cord injuries/disorders (PwSCI/D) and to estimate anxiety occurrence within this population using the full 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7). DESIGN: Multicenter retrospective analyses. SETTING: One inpatient rehabilitation center and 2 community sites for PwSCI/D. PARTICIPANTS: PwSCI/D 18 years or older (N=909) were included for analysis using retrospectively collected GAD-2 and GAD-7 data. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Occurrence of anxiety symptoms were compared using cut-off scores of ≥8 and ≥10 on the GAD-7. A cut-off score recommendation for the GAD-2 was determined using ROC curve, and sensitivity and specificity analyses. RESULTS: Occurrence of anxiety symptoms was 21% using a GAD-7 cut-off of ≥8 and 15% using a cut-off of ≥10. Analyses indicated optimal sensitivity for a GAD-2 score of ≥2 when a GAD-7 cut-off of ≥8 was used. CONCLUSIONS: Anxiety occurrence is elevated among PwSCI/D compared with the general population. For PwSCI/D, it is recommended that a cut-off score of ≥2 is used for the GAD-2 to maximize sensitivity and that a threshold of ≥8 is used for the GAD-7 to ensure the maximum number of individuals presenting with symptoms of anxiety are recognized for diagnostic interview. Study limitations are discussed.

The influence of psychological need on rehabilitation outcomes for people with spinal cord injury.

STUDY DESIGN: Single-centre, retrospective study of people with a spinal cord injury or disorder (PwSCI/D) and identified psychological need. OBJECTIVES: To examine the effect of psychological need on rehabilitation outcomes. SETTING: National Spinal Injuries Centre (NSIC), Stoke Mandeville Hospital, Buckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust, United Kingdom. METHODS: Self-reported data from the Stoke Mandeville Spinal Needs Assessment Checklist (SMS-NAC) were used to examine identified psychological need (characterised by referral for psychological treatment, or scoring above clinical threshold in admission psychometric measures) on SCI rehabilitation outcome domains. Participants were grouped according to whether they were referred, not referred, scored above or below clinical threshold. RESULTS: 234 participants were included (Mean age at injury (years) = 53, 70% Male, 29% tetraplegia, 38% paraplegia, 33% ASIA D). There was a significant improvement in outcome scores from admission to discharge across all domains irrespective of participant group, however individuals with identified psychological need scored lower across all rehabilitation domains than those without. While individuals with psychological need demonstrated longer rehabilitation stays, more frequent and longer discharge delays, they also showed comparatively greater rehabilitation improvements. Psychological screening measures were more effective at detecting psychological need than individuals identified via referral, and participants scoring above clinical threshold had poorest overall rehabilitation outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with psychological need have greater rehabilitation need and may require longer rehabilitation and benefit from additional discharge planning. Early, proactive psychometric screening can better facilitate improvements for delivering rehabilitation. Future research should consider specific contributing factors to psychological need, such as pre-existing mental health conditions or socio-demographic influences.

Building and Sustaining Inpatient-Clinician Collaboration in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation: A Case Example Using the Stoke Mandeville Spinal Needs Assessment Checklist (SMS-NAC) and Goal Planning Programme.

Goal planning is core for the delivery of the biopsychosocial model of rehabilitation and is commonly practiced in spinal cord injury (SCI) and other physical health settings. Despite a strong theoretical basis from several branches of psychology, evidence regarding specific practice, interventions and impact has yet to be established, with no universal standards in this area. Study One outlines the standards used at the National Spinal Injuries Centre (NSIC), Stoke Mandeville Hospital since the inception of the SMS-NAC and goal planning programme in 1989. The results outline the impact of a quality improvement project undertaken since 2016 and track the interventions used to improve inpatient care. Study Two reports on an international survey of rehabilitation measure usage and goal planning practice with inpatient adult and children and young people (CYP) with SCI. Respondents replied that inpatient presence at goal planning meetings only took place in 75% (adult) and 76% (CYP) of services, with more services indicating 4 or more members of the multidisciplinary team being present (85% and 90%, respectively). This paper demonstrates the gains that can be made when a structured quality improvement methodology is used and highlights the need for standards regarding goal planning in SCI rehabilitation to be developed.