Comparison of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Inhaled Technosphere Insulin and Subcutaneous Insulin Lispro in the Treatment of Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus.

BACKGROUND: This study was performed to satisfy a US Food and Drug Administration post-marketing requirement to compare the dose responses for Technosphere® Insulin (TI; MannKind Corporation, Westlake Village, CA, USA) and subcutaneous insulin lispro (LIS) across a wide range of doses. OBJECTIVES: This single-center, open-label, randomized, cross-over study defined the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic curves for inhaled TI vs subcutaneous LIS in persons with type 1 diabetes mellitus. METHODS: Each volunteer received six treatments while undergoing euglycemic clamps: three doses of TI (10, 30 and 120 U) and LIS (8, 30, and 90 U). Primary endpoint was area under the glucose infusion rate vs time curve from start of treatment administration to end of clamp. Key secondary endpoints included readouts of insulin exposure and timing of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profiles. RESULTS: Insulin exposure was more than dose proportional, increasing with dose1.08 for LIS and dose1.35 for TI. Time to reach 10% of the maximum glucose infusion rate was 7 to 15 min for TI vs 21 to 38 min for LIS. End of effect was dose dependent for both treatments, ranging from 2 to 6 h (TI) and 5 to 10 h (LIS). Glucose infusion rate exhibited saturation for both treatments. Technosphere Insulin produced a lesser total effect per unit insulin than LIS due to its faster absorption and correspondingly shorter duration of exposure. The difference was large enough to require significantly different doses to achieve the same total effect. CONCLUSIONS: Technosphere Insulin has a considerably faster onset and shorter duration of action than LIS. Consequently, the overall effect of TI is smaller than that of LIS and unit-for-unit dose conversion is not appropriate. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02470637; 12 June, 2015.

RESULTS OF A 24-WEEK TRIAL OF TECHNOSPHERE INSULIN VERSUS INSULIN ASPART IN TYPE 2 DIABETES.

OBJECTIVE: To compare glycemic efficacy of Technosphere insulin (TI) versus that of insulin aspart (IA), each added to basal insulin, in type 2 diabetes. METHODS: This randomized, 24-week trial included subjects aged from 18 to 80 years who were treated with subcutaneous insulin for 3 months and had glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) levels of 7.0% to 11.5%. After receiving stabilized insulin glargine doses during a 4-week lead in, the subjects were randomized to TI or IA. The primary end point was an HbA1C change from baseline, with the differences analyzed by equivalence analyses. RESULTS: In the overall cohort (N = 309; males, 23.3%), mean (SD) age was 58.5 (8.4) years, body mass index was 30.8 (4.7) kg/m2, weight was 82.2 (13.6) kg, and duration of diabetes was 12.2 (7.1) years. An intention-to-treat cohort had 150 subjects randomized to TI (mean [SD] HbA1C: 8.9% [1.1%]) and 154 randomized to IA (mean [SD] HbA1C: 9.0% [1.3%]). At 24 weeks, mean (SD) HbA1C value declined to 7.9% (1.3%) and 7.7% (1.1%) in the TI and IA cohorts, respectively. A treatment difference of 0.26% was not statistically significant, but the predefined equivalency margin was not met. Subjects receiving TI lost 0.78 kg compared to baseline; subjects receiving IA gained 0.23 kg (P =.0007). The incidence of mild/moderate hypoglycemia was lower for the TI cohort, though not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Both TI and IA resulted in significant and clinically meaningful HbA1C reductions. TI also resulted in significant and clinically meaningful weight reductions. These data support the use of inhaled insulin as a treatment option for individuals with type 2 diabetes.

Understanding inhaled Technosphere Insulin: Results of an early randomized trial in type 1 diabetes mellitus.

BACKGROUND: Technosphere Insulin (TI) is an inhaled insulin. Studies comparing TI with short-acting insulin analogues provide important insights on efficacy, dosing, and time course of action. METHODS: Planned enrollment of 230 subjects was limited to 138 due to premature study discontinuation. The primary efficacy endpoint was a noninferiority of glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) of 0.4% for TI compared with insulin lispro (LIS) in a 16-week phase 3 randomized clinical trial in type 1 diabetes mellitus. RESULTS: HbA1c values were similar in the TI and LIS groups at the beginning of the trial (7.8% and 7.6%, respectively) and at trial endpoint (7.7% and 7.6%, respectively). Least squares mean changes from baseline were similar between study groups. Glucose values after a standard meal were significantly lower with TI in the first 90 minutes post meal compared with LIS. Mild or moderate hypoglycemia event rates were also significantly lower with TI compared with LIS (5.97 vs 8.01, respectively; P = .0269). Cough was the most commonly reported adverse event with TI. Pulmonary function as measured by forced expiratory volume in 1 second was not different between groups at baseline, 16 weeks, or 4 weeks off study drug. CONCLUSIONS: HbA1c was unchanged and overall glucose control was comparable between groups. Treatment with TI resulted in improved post-meal glucose and a lower risk of hypoglycemia compared with LIS.

Improving Efficacy of Inhaled Technosphere Insulin (Afrezza) by Postmeal Dosing: In-silico Clinical Trial with the University of Virginia/Padova Type 1 Diabetes Simulator.

BACKGROUND: Technosphere(®) insulin (TI), an inhaled human insulin with a fast onset of action, provides a novel option for the control of prandial glucose. We used the University of Virginia (UVA)/Padova simulator to explore in-silico the potential benefit of different dosing regimens on postprandial glucose (PPG) control to support the design of further clinical trials. Tested dosing regimens included at-meal or postmeal dosing, or dosing before and after a meal (split dosing). METHODS: Various dosing regimens of TI were compared among one another and to insulin lispro in 100 virtual type-1 patients. Individual doses were identified for each regimen following different titration rules. The resulting postprandial glucose profiles were analyzed to quantify efficacy and the risk for hypoglycemic events. RESULTS: This approach allowed us to assess the benefit/risk for each TI dosing regimen and to compare results with simulations of insulin lispro. We identified a new titration rule for TI that could significantly improve the efficacy of treatment with TI. CONCLUSION: In-silico clinical trials comparing the treatment effect of different dosing regimens with TI and of insulin lispro suggest that postmeal dosing or split dosing of TI, in combination with an appropriate titration rule, can achieve a superior postprandial glucose control while providing a lower risk for hypoglycemic events than conventional treatment with subcutaneously administered rapid-acting insulin products.

Heat-Stable Dry Powder Oxytocin Formulations for Delivery by Oral Inhalation.

In this work, heat stable dry powders of oxytocin (OT) suitable for delivery by oral inhalation were prepared. The OT dry powders were prepared by spray drying using excipients chosen to promote OT stability including trehalose, isoleucine, polyvinylpyrrolidone, citrate (sodium citrate and citric acid), and zinc salts (zinc chloride and zinc citrate). Characterization by laser diffraction indicated that the OT dry powders had a median particle size of 2 µm, making them suitable for delivery by inhalation. Aerodynamic performance upon discharge from proprietary dry powder inhalers was evaluated by Andersen cascade impaction (ACI) and in an anatomically correct airway (ACA) model, and confirmed that the powders had excellent aerodynamic performance, with respirable fractions up to 77% (ACI, 30 L/min). Physicochemical characterization demonstrated that the powders were amorphous (X-ray diffraction) with high glass transition temperature (modulated differential scanning calorimetry, MDSC), suggesting the potential for stabilization of the OT in a glassy amorphous matrix. OT assay and impurity profile were conducted by reverse phase HPLC and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) after storage up to 32 weeks at 40°C/75%RH. Analysis demonstrated that OT dry powders containing a mixture of citrate and zinc salts retained more than 90% of initial assay after 32 weeks storage and showed significant reduction in dimers and trisulfide formation (up to threefold reduction compared to control).

Incorporation of inhaled insulin into the FDA accepted University of Virginia/Padova Type 1 Diabetes Simulator.

The University of Virginia/Padova Type 1 Diabetes (T1DM) Simulator has been extensively used in artificial pancreas research mostly for testing and design of control algorithms. However, it also offers the possibility of testing new insulin analogs and alternative routes of delivery given that subcutaneous insulin administration present significant delays & variability. Inhaled insulin appears an important candidate to improve post-prandial glucose control given its rapid appearance in plasma. In this contribution, we present the results of incorporating a pharmacokinetic model of inhaled Technosphere(®) Insulin (TI) into the T1DM simulator. In particular, we successfully reproduced in silico the post-prandial glucose control observed in T1DM subjects treated with TI given at meal time, and the post-prandial glucose dynamics in response to different timing of TI dose.

Device factors affecting pulmonary delivery of dry powders.

The use of orally inhaled dry powder technologies is one way of delivering medicines to the lung for treating local conditions or for achieving systemic effect. These involve dry powder formulations containing an active pharmaceutical ingredient together with inhaler devices. These powder/device systems enable patients to inhale and aerosolize the medicine into suitably sized particles that deposit in the lung. Several inhaler centric aspects of these delivery systems are presented and discussed in context of new product development. Case examples are provided to highlight several inhaler aspects and to guide development of powder/inhaler systems.

Peptide therapeutics: it's all in the delivery.

Recent work has demonstrated that the route of administration affects the pharmacokinetics and biological activity of peptides. For example, the physiological profile of insulin consists of basal and prandial components with a small-scale oscillatory element. Insulin is used more efficiently when the pharmacokinetic profile mimics features of physiological release. Noninvasive administration of insulin by oral, transdermal, nasal and pulmonary routes resembles the relatively sharp peak and short duration of exposure of prandial release. The route of administration per se, can affect the response by avoiding first-pass metabolism or perhaps altering the timing in which the peptide reaches different sets of receptors. GLP-I delivered by injection and inhalation produces different side effect profiles. Nonclinical studies on two potential treatments for obesity, oxyntomodulin and PYY 3-36, are also presented to illustrate the relationship between exposure and effect as functions of route of administration.

Preparation of macromolecule-containing dry powders for pulmonary delivery.

Drug delivery by inhalation is routine for the treatment of local pulmonary conditions like asthma, cystic fibrosis, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Only recently, though, has the inhalation route been considered for administering drugs for systemic diseases. The pulmonary route is attractive for several reasons. It is non-invasive, it avoids first-pass metabolism, and it allows drug absorption from a large, highly vascularized surface area. However, consistent delivery to the deep lung requires drug particles within a very narrow size range. Several particle engineering approaches have been used to produce dry powders that will reach the alveolar space. Some of these methods, such as spray drying from solution, the formation of drug-containing liposomes, and the controlled crystallization of particles, are described here.

Technosphere insulin: defining the role of Technosphere particles at the cellular level.

BACKGROUND: Technosphere Insulin (TI) is a novel inhalation powder for the treatment of diabetes mellitus. Technosphere Insulin delivers insulin with an ultra rapid pharmacokinetic profile that is distinctly different from all other insulin products but similar to natural insulin release. Such rapid absorption is often associated with penetration enhancers that disrupt cellular integrity. METHODS: Technosphere Insulin was compared to a panel of known penetration enhancers in vitro using the Calu-3 lung cell line to investigate the effects of TI on insulin transport. RESULTS: Measures of tight junction integrity such as transepithelial electrical resistance, Lucifer yellow permeability, and F-actin staining patterns were all unaffected by TI. Cell viability and plasma membrane integrity were also not affected by TI. In contrast, cells treated with comparable (or lower) concentrations of penetration enhancers showed elevated Lucifer yellow permeability, disruption of the F-actin network, reduced cell viability, and compromised plasma membranes. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that TI is not cytotoxic in an in vitro human lung cell model and does not function as a penetration enhancer. Furthermore, TI does not appear to affect the transport of insulin across cellular barriers.