Collection of peripheral blood stem cells following administration of paclitaxel, cyclophosphamide, and filgrastim in patients with breast and ovarian cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the toxicities and efficacy of paclitaxel, cyclophosphamide (Cy), and recombinant human granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (filgrastim) administered for mobilization and collection of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) in patients with breast and ovarian cancer. METHODS: One hundred and forty-one patients with breast (n = 115) or ovarian cancer (n = 26) received paclitaxel 170 mg/m2 and Cy 2 gm/m2 (n = 42) or paclitaxel 200 mg/m2, Cy 3 gm/m2 (n = 99), and filgrastim (6 micrograms/kg/day) followed by collection of PBSC by apheresis. RESULTS: The 2 dose levels of paclitaxel and Cy tested were well tolerated. The median yield of CD34+ cells from all patients was 6.53 x 10(6)/kg (range, 0.11-51.76) collected with a median of 2 aphereses (range, 1-8). The target dose of 2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg was achieved in 85% of patients. The mean daily collection of CD34+ cells was 5.46 x 10(6)/kg for patients receiving 200 mg/m2 of paclitaxel and 3 gm/m2 of Cy as compared to 2.77 for patients receiving the lower doses (p = 0.0005). Increasing the dose of paclitaxel and Cy did not significantly increase the fraction of patients achieving a target dose of 2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg (87% vs 81%, p = 0.367) but did increase the fraction achieving a target of 5.0 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg (73% vs 45%, p = 0.002). The mean daily collection of CD34+ cells for patients who had received only 1 prior chemotherapy regimen was 6.59 x 10(6)/kg as compared to 3.47 for patients who had received more than 1 prior chemotherapy regimen (p < 0.0001). Prior radiation therapy (p = 0.003) and patient performance status (p = 0.047) were adverse risk factors for achieving a target dose of > or = 2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of paclitaxel, Cy, and filgrastim can be administered with acceptable toxicity, allowing collection of adequate quantities of PBSC from the majority of patients with breast and ovarian cancer. Increasing the doses of paclitaxel and Cy increased the number of CD34+ cells collected and decreased the number of apheresis procedures necessary to collect target cell doses. However, increasing drug doses did not increase the fraction of patients yielding the minimum CD34+ target dose of 2.5 x 10(6)/kg. Collection of PBSC early in the disease course is the best strategy to assure optimal CD34+ cell doses in all patients.

Results of a compassionate-use program using intravenous ondansetron to prevent nausea and vomiting in patients receiving emetogenic cancer chemotherapy.

This study reports the effectiveness and side effects of intravenous ondansetron as a single-agent antiemetic therapy for patients receiving emetogenic cancer chemotherapy under a compassionate-use program for patients not enrolled in controlled clinical trials. Patients were > or = 7 years old and had uncontrolled nausea and vomiting or intolerable side effects with standard antiemetics administered with previous cancer chemotherapy. All patients received ondansetron 0.15 mg/kg every 4 hours x 3 daily doses beginning 30 minutes prior to emetogenic chemotherapy. Patients could receive ondansetron for up to 5 consecutive days of chemotherapy. One hundred ninety patients received ondansetron during chemotherapy treatments that were similar to previous cycles of chemotherapy during which the patients had received standard antiemetics (identical chemotherapy or differing only by addition/deletion of chemotherapy agents of low emetogenicity). Chemotherapy regimens included cisplatin (n = 99; 52%), doxorubicin (without cisplatin, n = 52; 27%), and other drugs (n = 39; 21%). Patient experiences with nausea and vomiting and side effects with ondansetron and with previous standard antiemetics were rated on a scale of 1 to 10 (1, did not experience; 10, as bad as could be). On the nausea and vomiting scale, 74% of patients improved on ondansetron relative to standard antiemetics. Mean nausea and vomiting scales were 3.9 for ondansetron and 7.7 for standard antiemetics (P < .001). On the side effects scale, 62% of patients improved with ondansetron. Mean side effect scores were 1.8 for ondansetron and 4.5 for standard antiemetics (P < .001). One hundred nine patients assessed the effect of nausea and vomiting on their quality of life by means of the Functional Living Index-Emesis. On a 100-point scale (100=best quality of life), quality of life scores were 65.5 for ondansetron and 39.5 for standard antiemetics (P < .01). Functional Living Index-Emesis scores were higher for 76% of patients during ondansetron treatment as compared with previous chemotherapy with standard antiemetic regimens. Twenty-eight patients (15%) were withdrawn from the study because of nausea and vomiting. Forty-four patients (23%) experienced other adverse effects (headache, 17 patients; diarrhea, eight patients; all other events occurred in two or fewer patients). Only six patients were withdrawn due to adverse effects. In conclusion, ondansetron therapy resulted in significantly improved control of nausea and vomiting, fewer side effects, and better quality of life than standard antiemetic therapy in the same patients receiving similar chemotherapy regimens.

Late postsplenectomy recurrence of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura responding to removal of accessory spleen.

The present report describes a patient who experienced recurrence of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura 10 years after the initial episode. The patient had been successfully treated with steroids and splenectomy and had complete clinical and hematologic remission. Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura recurred 10 years later and did not respond to steroids and plasmapheresis. The presence of an accessory spleen was demonstrated by technetium scanning. Surgical removal of the accessory spleen resulted again in prompt and complete recovery.

Etoposide and cisplatin salvage chemotherapy for small cell lung cancer.

Thirty patients with previously treated small cell lung cancer received salvage combination chemotherapy with etoposide and cisplatin. Two complete and six partial responses were observed, for a major response rate of 27%. Responses occurred promptly and sustained palliation was achieved among responders. Myelosuppression was the major dose-limiting toxic effect. A schedule of etoposide (115 mg/m2 iv on Days 1-3) and cisplatin (25 mg/m2 iv on Days 1-3 every 28 days) is recommended for further clinical trials.