Evidence-Based Practice for the Use of pH Indicator Paper Strip in Oral Medicine: A Literature Review.

The objective of our article is to review the literature and collect the advice of specialists for the evaluation of the reliabilityand appropriate indications of the use of pH paper in oral medicine practice. The literature pertaining to the use of pH paper in oral medicine practice was reviewed, and appropriate indications were suggested by a French multidisciplinary working group of specialists and validated by a lecture committee. By screening PubMed/MEDLINE from 1911 to March 2024, we found 621 articles. All abstracts were read, 22 articles were selected for full-text reading, and 12 were ultimately included in the review. Three more articles from other sources were included. Thus, 15 articles constituted the literature review; seven papers from PubMed/MEDLINE focusing on how to restore the salivary pH balance in cases of periodontitis and early childhood caries (ECC) completed the review. It is concluded that the lack of sensitivity of pH paper must be underlined. A low pH is a cofactor leading to oral pathologies, and the use of pH paper constitutes an easy diagnostic instrument in patients with pH variations correlated to leukemia, diabetic mellitus, or orofacial radiotherapy. The evaluation of salivary pH using pH paper may be used as a quick chairside test, specifically in cases of ECC and uncontrolled severe periodontitis. Early diagnosis of salivary low pH range in children as well as periodontitis with deep pocket associated with a low pH range in adults should lead to the supply of fluoride and prescript sodium bicarbonate-containing dentifrices, respectively. In children, the use of a chewable toothbrush may help reduce plaque and elevate salivary pH.

Inclusion-body myositis associated with Sjögren's disease: clinical characteristics and comparison with other Sjögren-associated myositis.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the characteristics of patients with Sjögren's disease (SjD) and inclusion-body myositis (IBM), and how they compare to SjD patients with other inflammatory myopathies (IM). METHODS: Patients were retrospectively recruited from 13 French centers and included if they met the ACR/EULAR criteria for SjD and for IM. They were categorized as SjD-IBM if sub-criteria for IBM were met, or as SjD-other IM if not. RESULTS: SjD-IBM patients (n = 22) were mostly females (86%), with a median [Q1; Q3] age of 54 [38.5; 64] years at SjD diagnosis, and 62 [46.5; 70] years at first IBM symptoms. Although most patients displayed glandular and immunological abnormalities, additional extra-glandular manifestations were uncommon, resulting in moderate disease activity at SjD diagnosis (ESSDAI 5.5 [1; 7.8]). Classic IBM features were frequent, such as progressive symptom onset (59%), asymmetrical (27%) and distal (32%) involvements, dysphagia (41%), low CPK (386.5 [221.8; 670.5] UI/l) and CRP (3.0 [3; 8.5] mg/l) levels. Immunosuppressants were reported as efficient in 55% of cases.Compared with SjD-IBM patients, SjD patients with other IM (n = 50) were significantly younger, displayed more frequent additional extra-glandular disease, higher ESSDAI score (11 [3; 30]), shorter delay between SjD diagnosis and myositis onset (0 [-0.5; 26]), more frequent CPK values over 1000 UI/l (36%), and less frequent classic IBM features. CONCLUSION: IBM can occur in SjD patients, with muscle features reminiscent of classic sporadic IBM characteristics, but mostly affecting women. In SjD patients with muscle involvement, extra-glandular manifestations, high ESSDAI score, elevated CPK values, and shorter delay after SjD diagnosis plead against IBM.

Diagnosis and treatment of Tropheryma whipplei infection in patients with inflammatory rheumatic disease: Data from the French Tw-IRD registry.

OBJECTIVES: Tropheryma whipplei infection can manifest as inflammatory joint symptoms, which can lead to misdiagnosis of inflammatory rheumatic disease and the use of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. We investigated the impact of diagnosis and treatment of Tropheryma whipplei infection in patients with inflammatory rheumatic disease. METHODS: We initiated a registry including patients with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs-treated inflammatory rheumatic disease who were subsequently diagnosed with Tropheryma whipplei infection. We collected clinical, biological, treatment data of the inflammatory rheumatic disease, of Tropheryma whipplei infection, and impact of antibiotics on the evolution of inflammatory rheumatic disease. RESULTS: Among 73 inflammatory rheumatic disease patients, disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs initiation triggered extra-articular manifestations in 27% and resulted in stabilisation (51%), worsening (34%), or improvement (15%) of inflammatory rheumatic disease. At the diagnosis of Tropheryma whipplei infection, all patients had rheumatological symptoms (mean age 58 years, median inflammatory rheumatic disease duration 79 months), 84% had extra-rheumatological manifestations, 93% had elevated C-reactive protein, and 86% had hypoalbuminemia. Treatment of Tropheryma whipplei infection consisted mainly of doxycycline plus hydroxychloroquine, leading to remission of Tropheryma whipplei infection in 79% of cases. Antibiotic treatment of Tropheryma whipplei infection was associated with remission of inflammatory rheumatic disease in 93% of cases and enabled disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and glucocorticoid discontinuation in most cases. CONCLUSIONS: Tropheryma whipplei infection should be considered in inflammatory rheumatic disease patients with extra-articular manifestations, elevated C-reactive protein, and/or hypoalbuminemia before disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs initiation or in inflammatory rheumatic disease patients with an inadequate response to one or more disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Positive results of screening and diagnostic tests for Tropheryma whipplei infection involve antibiotic treatment, which is associated with complete recovery of Tropheryma whipplei infection and rapid remission of inflammatory rheumatic disease, allowing disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and glucocorticoid discontinuation.

Cogan syndrome: Characteristics, outcome and treatment in a French nationwide retrospective study and literature review.

BACKGROUND: Cogan syndrome is mainly treated with steroids. We aimed to determine the place of DMARDs and biologic-targeted treatments. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a French nationwide retrospective study of patients with Cogan syndrome (n=40) and a literature review of cases (n=22) and analyzed the efficacy of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) antagonists. RESULTS: We included 62 patients (31 females) (median age 37years [range 2-76]. At diagnosis, 61 patients (98%) had vestibulo-auditory symptoms, particularly bilateral hearing loss in 41% and deafness in 31%. Ocular signs were present in 57 patients (92%), with interstitial keratitis in 31 (51%). The first-line treatment consisted of steroids alone (n=43; 70%) or associated with other immunosuppressive drugs (n=18; 30%). Overall, 13/43 (30%) and 4/18 (22%) patients with steroids alone and with associated immunosuppressive drugs, respectively (p=0.8), showed vestibulo-auditory response; 32/39 (82%) and 15/19 (79%) ocular response; and 23/28 (82%) and 10/14 (71%) general response. Overall 61 patients had used a total of 126 lines of treatment, consisting of steroids alone (n=51 lines), steroids with DMARDs (n=65) and infliximab (n=10). Vestibulo-auditory response was significantly more frequent with infliximab than DMARDs or steroids alone (80% vs 39% and 35%, respectively), whereas ocular, systemic and acute-phase reactant response rates were similar. Infliximab was the only significant predictor of vestibulo-auditory improvement (odds ratio 20.7 [95% confidence interval 1.65; 260], p=0.019). CONCLUSION: Infliximab could lead to vestibulo-auditory response in DMARDS and steroid-refractory Cogan syndrome, but prospective studies are necessary.

Rituximab maintenance therapy for granulomatosis with polyangiitis and microscopic polyangiitis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy compared to the relapse risk and tolerance of systematic rituximab (RTX) infusions as maintenance therapy for patients with granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) or microscopic polyangiitis (MPA), who entered remission taking conventional immunosuppressants or RTX. METHODS: A retrospective study of the main clinical characteristics, outcomes, and RTX tolerance of patients who had received ≥ 2 RTX maintenance infusions in our center, regardless of induction regimen, between 2003 and 2010. RESULTS: We identified 28 patients [4 MPA and 24 GPA; median age 55.5 yrs (range 18-78); 17 (60%) males] who received a median of 4 (range 2-10) RTX maintenance infusions, with median followup of 38 months (range 21-97) since diagnosis or last flare. None experienced a RTX infusion-related adverse event; 15 patients (among the 21 with available data) had hypogammaglobulinemia (predominantly IgM) prior to their last RTX maintenance infusion; 3 had infectious events (1 cutaneous abscess, 1 otitis, 1 fatal H1N1 flu). Two patients suffered pulmonary relapses shortly before a planned RTX maintenance infusion (both had increased antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody levels and 1 had CD19+ lymphocyte reconstitution). CONCLUSION: Rituximab maintenance therapy was well tolerated but did not completely prevent relapses and persistent "grumbling" disease. These preliminary results remain to be confirmed by a randomized controlled trial currently in progress.