Prospective Assessment of an Automated Intraprocedural 12-Lead ECG-Based System for Localization of Early Left Ventricular Activation.

BACKGROUND: To facilitate ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT), an automated localization system to identify the site of origin of left ventricular activation in real time using the 12-lead ECG was developed. The objective of this study was to prospectively assess its accuracy. METHODS: The automated site of origin localization system consists of 3 steps: (1) localization of ventricular segment based on population templates, (2) population-based localization within a segment, and (3) patient-specific site localization. Localization error was assessed by the distance between the known reference site and the estimated site. RESULTS: In 19 patients undergoing 21 catheter ablation procedures of scar-related VT, site of origin localization accuracy was estimated using 552 left ventricular endocardial pacing sites pooled together and 25 VT-exit sites identified by contact mapping. For the 25 VT-exit sites, localization error of the population-based localization steps was within 10 mm. Patient-specific site localization achieved accuracy of within 3.5 mm after including up to 11 pacing (training) sites. Using 3 remotes (67.8±17.0 mm from the reference VT-exit site), and then 5 close pacing sites, resulted in localization error of 7.2±4.1 mm for the 25 identified VT-exit sites. In 2 emulated clinical procedure with 2 induced VTs, the site of origin localization system achieved accuracy within 4 mm. CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective validation study, the automated localization system achieved estimated accuracy within 10 mm and could thus provide clinical utility.

The Effect of Cardiac Rehabilitation and a Specialized Clinic on Outcomes of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) intervention programs are currently not part of management in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). We sought to determine the effect of CR compared with a specialized AF clinic (AFC) and usual care on outcomes in patients with AF. METHODS: This was a single-centre retrospective cohort study that was carried out using 3 databases: the Hearts in Motion database (2010-2014), prospectively collected data in an AFC (2011-2014), and a retrospective chart review for patients in usual care (2009-2012). Three care pathways were compared: (1) CR; (2) AFC; and (3) usual specialist-based care. The main outcome was AF-related emergency department visits and cardiovascular hospitalizations. RESULTS: Of 566 patients with newly diagnosed AF, 133 (23.5%) patients underwent CR, 197 patients (34.8%) attended the AFC, whereas the remaining 236 (41.7%) were followed in a usual specialist-based care clinic. At 1 year, AF-related emergency department visits and cardiovascular hospitalization rates occurred in 7.5% in the CR group, 16.8% in the AFC group, and 29.2% in usual care. After a propensity matched analysis, usual care was associated with the highest rate of the main outcome (odds ratio, 4.91; 95% confidence interval, 2.09-11.53) compared with CR, as did the AFC compared with CR (odds ratio, 2.75; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-6.6). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with AF, CR was associated with a lower risk of AF-related outcomes. These findings support further study of the use of CR in the management of these patients to determine the optimal model of care for AF patients.

Effect of coronary revascularization on long-term clinical outcomes in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and recurrent ventricular arrhythmia.

BACKGROUND: Patients with ventricular tachycardia (VT) postmyocardial infarction (MI) are a higher risk group with significant morbidity and mortality. We examined the impact of prior coronary revascularization on clinical outcomes in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and VT. METHODS: The VANISH trial randomized 259 patients with prior MI and antiarrhythmic drug-refractory VT to receive escalated medical therapy or catheter ablation. Clinical outcomes were compared according to whether patients have undergone prior revascularization procedures. The primary outcome was a composite of death, appropriate implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) shock, or VT storm. The secondary outcomes included elements of the primary outcome, hospitalization, and any ventricular arrhythmia. RESULTS: 190 patients (73%) had prior coronary revascularization. Revascularization group had more men (97% vs 83%; P  =  0.0003) and patients in that group were older (mean age 69.3 ± 7.6 vs 66.7 ± 9.2; P  =  0.04), had more renal insufficiency (22.6% vs 8.7%; P  =  0.01), and were more likely to have an implanted cardiac resynchronization device (23% vs 10%, P  =  0.03) as compared with the nonrevascularized patients. There were no significant differences in baseline medication use. There was a trend toward fewer hospitalizations in the revascularization group (64% vs 77%; P  =  0.07); there were no differences in the individual outcomes of mortality, VT storm, ICD shocks, recurrent MI, or cardiac failure. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of patients with an ischemic cause for VT, a history of prior coronary revascularization was not associated with a reduction in ventricular arrhythmia or mortality.