Exposure study on susceptible people - SPES: An integrative biomonitoring approach.

BACKGROUND: The evaluation of environmental exposure risk requires a global analysis of pollution phenomena, including biological effects and potentially correlated clinical outcomes in susceptible populations. Although human biomonitoring plays a fundamental role in assessing the degree of contamination, it is not effective alone in identifying a direct link between exposure, biomolecular effects and outcomes on target organisms. While toxicogenomics and epidemiology are mainly focused on the investigation of molecular reactions and clinical outcomes, the monitoring of environmental matrices works independently to characterize the territorial distribution of toxic compounds, without proving any correlated health risk for residents. OBJECTIVES: We propose a new biomonitoring model based on a whole systemic analytical evaluation of environmental context. The paradigm of the method consists of identifying the sources of pollution, the migration pathways of those pollutants and their effects on target organisms. By means of this innovative, holistic epidemiological approach, we included healthy human subjects in a cohort to identify potential risks of exposure and predict possible correlated clinical outcomes. 4205 residents of the Campania region were enrolled in the "SPES" biomonitoring study, which especially focused on the areas dubbed "Land of Fires" in the recent decades. DISCUSSION: The analysis of environmental exposure risk suffers the lack of data integration from various science fields, and this comes down to a limited point of view and a limited knowledge of phenomena. In implementing our model, we first constructed an analytical picture of the Real-world situation. We next conducted a comparative risk assessment, in order to identify possible correlations between pollution and health within a holistic view. CONCLUSION: This type of research activities aims to support the implementation of public health interventions and to become a reference model in the evaluation of the risk of exposure to environmental pollutants.

Risks Related To Fluoroscopy Radiation Associated With Electrophysiology Procedures.

The benefits of cardiac imaging are immense, and modern cardiac electrophysiology (EP) requires the extensive and versatile use of a variety of cardiac imaging and radiology-based techniques. In the cardiac electrophysiology lab, doses can range around a reference effective dose (ED) of 15 milliSievert corresponding to 750 chest x-rays for a cardiac radiofrequency ablation, ranging from less than 2 to > 60 mSv. The reference dose for a regular pacemaker or ICD implant is 4 mSv (range 1.4-17) and for a CRT implant is 22 mSv (range 2.2-95). Doses on the order of magnitude of 10-100 milliSievert (mSv) correspond to a low (albeit definite, not negligible) additional lifetime risk of fatal and non-fatal cancer from between 1 in 1000 (10 mSv) to 1 in 100 (100 mSv). The increasing use and complexity of cardiac electrophysiology techniques have not been matched by increasing awareness and knowledge by prescribers and practitioners. The protection of doctors is just as important as protection of patients. Most experienced (and most exposed) interventional cardiologists and electrophysiologists have an exposure per annum of around 5 mSv, two to three times higher than diagnostic radiologists, with a typical cumulative lifetime attributable risk on the order of magnitude of 1 cancer (fatal and non-fatal) per 100 exposed subjects. Operator dose per procedure correlates somewhat with the patient dose, but may be typically 1000 times lower depending upon the shielding employed (one unit of incidence scatter dose for the operator when 1000 units of incident dose are given to the patient). However, adequate radiation protection training and diligent protection can reduce this radiation exposure by 90%. The priority given to radioprotection in every cardiology department is an effective strategy for primary prevention of cancer, a strong indicator of the quality of the cardiology division, and the most effective shielding for enhancing the safety of patients, doctors, and staff.

Identification of platelet hyper-reactivity measured with a portable device immediately after percutaneous coronary intervention predicts in stent thrombosis.

INTRODUCTION: Platelet hyper-reactivity, despite a standard anti-thrombotic therapy, is a recognized risk factor for recurrent myocardial ischemia and in-stent thrombosis following PCI. We have investigated whether this detrimental condition, measured by collagen-epinephrine closure times (CEPI-CT) with the Platelet Function Analyzer (PFA-100) device could predict IST defined as the composite of cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CEPI-CT was measured in 256 consecutive patients with stable angina (n=103) or ACS (n=153) 30+/-8 h after PCI (T 0) and 1 month later (T1). All patients were followed up for a mean period of 9 months. Platelet hyperactivity was defined as a CEPI-CT<190 s. RESULTS: Baseline CEPI-CT<190 s was associated with a higher rate of death or MI (LogRank chi2=4.23, p=0.039) as compared with CEPI-CT>190 s (4.6% vs. 0.7%). Multivariable analysis after adjustment for other risk factors confirmed that baseline CEPI-CT<190 s was an independent correlate for death or MI (Hazard ratio 6.981, p=0.008). At T1 there was a significant prolongation of CEPI-CT (p=0.03) from 208+/-64 s to 240+/-59 s but T1 did not predict any event. CONCLUSIONS: A CEPI-CT<190 s measured within the first 24 h following PCI predicts IST defined as the occurrence of death or MI.