Case report medical eponyms: an applied clinical informatics opportunity.

Medical eponyms are medical words derived from people's names. Eponyms, especially similar sounding eponyms, may be confusing to people trying to use them because the terms themselves do not contain physiologically descriptive words about the condition they refer to. Through the use of electronic health records (EHRs), embedded applied clinical informatics tools including synonyms and pick lists that include physiologically descriptive terms associated with any eponym appearing in the EHR can significantly enhance the correct use of medical eponyms. Here we describe a case example of two similar sounding medical eponyms--Wegener's disease and Wegner's disease-- which were confused in our EHR. We describe our solution to address this specific example and our suggestions and accomplishments developing more generalized approaches to dealing with medical eponyms in EHRs. Integrating brief physiologically descriptive terms with medical eponyms provides an applied clinical informatics opportunity to improve patient care.

Nursing home residents' preferences for life-sustaining treatments.

OBJECTIVES: To determine life-sustaining treatment preferences among nursing home residents, whether information regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) affected these preferences, and with whom treatment preferences had been discussed, and to identify factors associated with CPR preferences. DESIGN: In-person survey. SETTING: Forty-nine randomly selected nursing homes. SUBJECTS: Four hundred twenty-one randomly selected nursing home residents capable of making decisions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Preferences regarding CPR, hospitalization, and enteral tube feedings, and individual factors associated with CPR preferences. RESULTS: Of 1458 randomly selected nursing home residents assessed for the ability to participate in the study, 552 residents (38%) were eligible to participate and 421 agreed to be interviewed. Sixty percent of participants able to participate in the decision reported that they would elect CPR, 89% would choose hospitalization if seriously ill, and 33% would elect enteral tube feedings if no longer able to eat because of permanent brain damage. Individual factors associated with preferences for CPR included the following: African-American ethnicity, high self-reported physical mobility, belief that most important medical care decisions should be made by the doctor, moderate-to-severe impairment in daily decision-making skills, and not having a spouse. Fourteen percent changed their preference from preferring CPR to not preferring CPR after receiving additional information about CPR procedures. Twelve percent reported having discussed preferences with health care providers, and 31% discussed preferences with family members. CONCLUSIONS: More than half of nursing home residents capable of making decisions preferred the use of CPR. Few had discussed their preferences with health care providers. Individual preferences should be assessed when considering the use of life-sustaining treatments.

Pruritus: a practical approach.

Pruritus is usually caused by a primary disorder of the skin, but can also be caused by a systemic disease (Table 1). Some dermatologic conditions that cause pruritus can be inconspicuous or nonspecific (Table 2), while others are usually apparent on physical examination (Table 3). Classification of pruritus as localized (Fig. 1) vs. generalized (Fig. 3) can be helpful in arriving at a correct diagnosis. The history and physical examination are the most important diagnostic tools, though laboratory testing for systemic disease may be necessary. In refractory cases, one should consider occult systemic disease (such as malignancy), psychiatric disease (especially depression), and HIV infection. Subsequent referral to a dermatologist may be indicted. When treatment of the underlying cause of pruritus is not possible, antihistamines and topical agents (menthol, phenol, and/or pramoxine) can be helpful.

The Patient Self-Determination Act and the future of advance directives.

Living wills and other advance directives currently play a limited role in medical decision making. A new federal law, the Patient Self-Determination Act, will require health care providers in hospitals, nursing homes, and other facilities to inquire about the presence of advance directives, to record patient preferences in the medical record, and to develop institutional policies regarding the implementation of these directives. Unfortunately, the law does little to promote discussion or preparation of advance directives before hospitalization. Additional efforts to promote the use of advance directives can take place in the outpatient medical care system, in attorneys' offices, or through health insurers. Because most people have not yet prepared an advance directive, we suggest that institutions develop treatment policies for situations in which the wishes of patients who lack decisional capacity are not known. These policies should be designed to promote the patients' best interests, as defined by the consensus of the institutions' staff and members of the surrounding community.

Biochemical markers of compliance in the Physicians' Health Study.

The Physicians' Health Study is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial using a 2 x 2 factorial design to test the effects of low-dose aspirin on risk of cardiovascular disease and beta-carotene supplementation on the incidence of cancer. To evaluate self-reported compliance with assigned treatment, we measured serum thromboxane B2, which is decreased after aspirin use, and plasma beta-carotene in samples of study participants drawn from three geographic locations in three different time periods. Thromboxane B2 levels were markedly lower in those assigned to aspirin (median = 63.5 pg/mL) than in those given aspirin placebo (median = 3,600 pg/mL, P less than .0001). Similarly, those assigned to beta-carotene had significantly higher levels (median = 1,176 ng/mL) than those given placebo (median = 306 ng/mL, P less than .0001). In addition, there was a highly significant positive correlation between levels of these biochemical markers and the self-reports of compliance (r = 0.65 for thromboxane B2 and r = 0.69 for beta-carotene, P less than .0001). These findings support the validity of the self-reported compliance in the Physicians' Health Study.