What is the risk of a shunt malfunction after elective intradural surgery?

OBJECT: Surgery for CSF diversion is the most common procedure performed by pediatric neurosurgeons. The failure rates for shunts remain frustratingly high, resulting in a burden to patients, families, providers, and healthcare systems. The goal of this study was to quantify the risk of a shunt malfunction in patients with an existing shunt who undergo an elective intradural operation. METHODS: All elective intradural surgeries (cranial and spinal) at Le Bonheur Children's Hospital from January 2010 through June 2014 were reviewed to identify those patients who had a functional ventricular shunt at the time of surgery. Patient records were reviewed to collect demographic, surgical, clinical, radiological, and pathologic data, including all details related to any subsequent shunt revision surgery. The primary outcome was all-cause shunt revision (i.e., malfunction or infection) within 90 days of elective intradural surgery. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty elective intradural surgeries were identified in 109 patients during the study period. There were 14 patients (12.8%, 13 male) who experienced 16 shunt malfunctions (10.7%) within 90 days of elective intradural surgery. These 14 patients underwent 13 craniotomies, 2 endoscopic fenestrations for loculated hydrocephalus, and 1 laminectomy for dorsal rhizotomy. Median time to failure was 9 days, with the shunts in half of our patients failing within 5 postoperative days. Those patients with failed shunts were younger (median 4.2 years [range 0.33-26 years] vs median 10 years [range 0.58-34 years]), had a shorter time interval from their previous shunt surgery (median 11 months [range 0-81 months] vs median 20 months [range 0-238 months]), and were more likely to have had intraventricular surgery (80.0% vs. 60.3%). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to quantify the risk of a shunt malfunction after elective intradural surgery. The 90-day all-cause shunt failure rate (per procedure) was 10.7%, with half of the failures occurring within the first 5 postoperative days. Possible risk factors for shunt malfunction after elective intradural surgeries are intraventricular surgical approach, shorter time since last shunt-related surgery, and young age.

Fibrinolysis for intraventricular hemorrhage: an updated meta-analysis and systematic review of the literature.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Intraventricular hemorrhage is associated with high mortality and poor functional outcome. The use of intraventricular fibrinolytic (IVF) therapy as an intervention in intraventricular hemorrhage is an evolving therapy with conflicting reports in the literature. The goal of this study is to investigate the impact of IVF on mortality, functional outcome, ventriculitis, shunt dependence, and rehemorrhage. METHODS: During March and April 2014, a systematic literature search was performed identifying 1359 articles. Of these, 24 met inclusion criteria. A random effects meta-analysis was performed using both pooled and subset analysis based on study type. RESULTS: Our meta-analysis demonstrated that IVF reduced mortality in intraventricular hemorrhage by nearly half (relative risk [RR], 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.42-0.71; P<0.00001), increased the likelihood of good functional outcome by 66% (RR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.27-2.19; P=0.0003), and also decreased the rate of shunt dependence (RR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.42-0.93; P=0.02). IVF was not found to be associated with increased rates of ventriculitis (RR=1.46; 95% CI, 0.77-2.76; P=0.25) or rehemorrhage (RR=1.06; 95% CI, 0.66-1.70; P=0.80). We detected no evidence of publication bias. CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis showed that IVF is safe and could be an effective strategy for the treatment of intraventricular hemorrhage. It may reduce mortality, improve functional outcome, and diminish the need for permanent ventricular shunting, while not increasing the risk of ventriculitis or rehemorrhage.

Neurosurgical checklists: a review.

Morbidity due to avoidable medical errors is a crippling reality intrinsic to health care. In particular, iatrogenic surgical errors lead to significant morbidity, decreased quality of life, and attendant costs. In recent decades there has been an increased focus on health care quality improvement, with a concomitant focus on mitigating avoidable medical errors. The most notable tool developed to this end is the surgical checklist. Checklists have been implemented in various operating rooms internationally, with overwhelmingly positive results. Comparatively, the field of neurosurgery has only minimally addressed the utility of checklists as a health care improvement measure. Literature on the use of checklists in this field has been sparse. Considering the widespread efficacy of this tool in other fields, the authors seek to raise neurosurgical awareness regarding checklists by reviewing the current literature.

Surgical debriefing: a reliable roadmap to completing the patient safety cycle.

Morbidity and mortality due to preventable medical errors are a disastrous reality in medicine. Debriefing, a process that allows individuals to discuss team performance in a constructive, supportive environment, has been linked to improved performance in various medical and surgical fields, including improvements in specific procedures, teamwork and communication, and error identification. However, the neurosurgical literature on this topic is limited. The authors review the debriefing literature in the field of medicine, with a specific emphasis on the operating room, and they report their own institutional experience with a debriefing module, from invention to pilot implementation, at Vanderbilt University Medical Center. The authors share the challenges and lessons learned from their quality improvement project. The field of neurosurgery would undoubtedly benefit from embracing debriefing, as its potential has been established in other medical specialties and can serve as a valuable role in immediately learning from mistakes. The authors hope that their colleagues can learn from this experience and improve their own.