RESUMO
BACKGROUND: A recent multicenter trial showed a reduction in tricuspid regurgitation (TR) progression when tricuspid annuloplasty was performed at the time of surgery for degenerative mitral regurgitation (MR), but with a 14% permanent pacemaker (PPM) rate. We present real-world outcomes at a high-volume center for degenerative MR surgery with/without tricuspid annuloplasty. METHODS: Patients undergoing first-time degenerative mitral surgery between 2011 and 2021 were identified (n = 1738). After excluding patients undergoing aortic, aortic valve, or tricuspid replacement procedures, patients were stratified into mitral surgery alone (n = 1068) vs mitral surgery plus tricuspid annuloplasty (n = 417). Outcomes, including operative mortality, new PPM implantation, postoperative length of stay, and risk-adjusted overall mortality, were compared. RESULTS: Among 1485 patients in this study, 98% underwent mitral repair. Compared with concomitant tricuspid annuloplasty patients, those undergoing mitral surgery alone were 6 years younger and had lower median The Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of mortality. Among concomitant tricuspid repair patients, 85% (355 of 417) had moderate or less preoperative TR, whereas 15% (61 of 417) had severe TR. Operative mortality was 1.4%. The incidence of new PPM implantation was 0.7% (7 of 1068) in the mitral only group and 5.5% (23 of 417) in the concomitant tricuspid group (P < .001). Although unadjusted cumulative survival was lower in the concomitant tricuspid group, after risk adjustment, concomitant tricuspid surgery was not associated with worse overall mortality (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.53-1.19; P = .27). CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant tricuspid annuloplasty is safe, with no difference in mortality and a <6% PPM rate at a high-volume mitral center. These data provide real-world context for concomitant tricuspid annuloplasty.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Current cardiac surgery risk algorithms and quality measures focus on perioperative outcomes. However, delivering high-value, patient-centered cardiac care will require a better understanding of long-term patient-reported quality of life after surgery. Our objective was to prospectively assess the effect of cardiac surgery on long-term patient-reported outcomes. METHODS: Patients undergoing cardiac surgery at an academic medical center (2016 to 2017) were eligible for enrollment. Patient-reported outcomes were measured using the National Institutes of Health Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively across five domains: mental health, physical health, physical functioning, social satisfaction, and applied cognition. Baseline data and perioperative outcomes were obtained from The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database. The effect of cardiac surgery on long-term patient-reported quality of life was assessed. RESULTS: Ninety-eight patients were enrolled and underwent cardiac surgery, with 92.9% (91 of 98) successful follow-up. The most common operation was coronary artery bypass graft surgery at 63.3% (62 of 98), with 60.2% (59 of 98) undergoing an elective operation. One-year all-cause mortality was 5.1% (5 of 98). Rate of major morbidity was 11.2% (11 of 98). Cardiac surgery significantly improved patient-reported outcomes at 1 year across four domains: mental health (preoperative 47.3 ± 7.7 vs postoperative 51.1 ± 8.9, P < .001), physical health (41.2 ± 8.2 vs 46.3 ± 9.3, P < .001), physical functioning (39.8 ± 8.6 vs 44.8 ± 8.5, P < .001), and social satisfaction (46.8 ± 10.9 vs 50.7 ± 10.8, P = .023). Hospital discharge to a facility did not affect 1-year patient-reported outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac surgery improves long-term patient-reported quality of life. Mental, physical, and social well-being scores were significantly higher 1 year postoperatively. Data collection with the National Institutes of Health Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System provides meaningful, quantifiable results that may improve delivery of patient-centered care.