Twenty-Year Experience with Rigid Intramedullary Nailing of Femoral Shaft Fractures in Skeletally Immature Patients.

BACKGROUND: Debate exists over the safety of rigid intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures in skeletally immature patients. The goal of this study was to describe functional outcomes and complication rates of rigid intramedullary nailing in pediatric patients. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of femoral shaft fractures in skeletally immature patients treated with trochanteric rigid intramedullary nailing from 1987 to 2009. Radiographs made at initial injury, immediately postoperatively, and at the latest follow-up were reviewed. Patients were administered the Nonarthritic Hip Score and a survey. RESULTS: The study population of 241 patients with 246 fractures was primarily male (75%) with a mean age of 12.9 years (range, eight to seventeen years). The majority of fractures were closed (92%) and associated injuries were common (45%). The mean operative time was 119 minutes, and the mean estimated blood loss was 202 mL. The mean clinical follow-up time was 16.2 months (range, three to seventy-nine months), and there were ninety-three patients with a minimum two-year clinical and radiographic follow-up. An increase of articulotrochanteric distance of >5 mm was noted in 15.1% (fourteen of ninety-three patients) at a minimum two-year follow-up; however, clinically relevant growth disturbance was only observed in two patients (2.2%) with the development of asymptomatic coxa valga. There was no femoral head osteonecrosis. Among the 246 fractures, twenty-four complications (9.8%) occurred. At the time of the latest follow-up, 1.7% (four of 241 patients) reported pain. The average Nonarthritic Hip Score was 92.4 points (range, 51 to 100 points), and 100% of patients reported satisfaction with their treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Rigid intramedullary nailing is an effective technique for treatment of femoral shaft fractures in pediatric patients with an acceptable rate of complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Rigid Intramedullary Nailing of Femoral Shaft Fractures in Skeletally Immature Patients Using a Lateral Trochanteric Entry Portal.

INTRODUCTION: We describe rigid intramedullary nailing using a trochanteric entry for internal fixation of femoral shaft fractures in older children and adolescents. STEP 1 PREPARATION PRIOR TO INCISION: Appropriate preparation prior to the operation is key to minimizing intraoperative and postoperative complications. STEP 2 PERFORM INCISION AND EXPOSURE: A well-positioned incision will facilitate and reduce difficulty with ideal guidewire placement. STEP 3 PLACE AND OVERREAM THE GUIDE PIN: Ensure that the guide pin is properly positioned on the greater trochanter, while avoiding the piriformis fossa. STEP 4 PLACE THE GUIDEWIRE AND REDUCE THE FRACTURE: Prepare the definitive guidewire. Insert the guidewire into the proximal fragment via the trochanteric portal. While maintaining the fracture reduction, advance the guidewire into the distal fragment. STEP 5 MEASURE NAIL LENGTH AND BEGIN OVERREAMING: Pay careful attention to the amount of reaming as well as distraction across the fracture site to provide the best fit for the nail. STEP 6 INSERT THE NAIL: Be sure to maintain the reduction while advancing the nail across the fracture site. Reconfirm that traction has been reduced to avoid distraction at the fracture site. STEP 7 INSERT PROXIMAL AND DISTAL INTERLOCKS: Use the interlocking screws to secure the proper rotational alignment. STEP 8 MAKE FINAL IMAGES AND CLOSE THE WOUND: Confirm the reduction and adequate fixation before closure. RESULTS: In our original study, a cohort of 246 femoral shaft fractures among 241 skeletally immature patients treated with trochanteric entry rigid intramedullary nailing was retrospectively reviewed.IndicationsContraindicationsPitfalls & Challenges.

Complications and outcomes of diaphyseal forearm fracture intramedullary nailing: a comparison of pediatric and adolescent age groups.

BACKGROUND: Flexible intramedullary nailing (IMN) has become a popular technique for the management of unstable or open forearm fractures. Recent publications have suggested an increased incidence of delayed union and poor outcomes in older children and adolescents. The objective of this study was to review forearm fractures treated with IMN, comparing the rate of complications and outcomes between the 2 age groups. Our hypothesis was that IMN is an effective technique with a similar rate of complications in both age groups. METHODS: An Institutional Review Board-approved retrospective review was conducted of pediatric forearm fractures treated from 1998 to 2008 at a single institution. Over the study time period, 4161 pediatric forearm fractures were managed nonoperatively (92%) and 353 were treated operatively with plate, cross-pin, or intramedullary fixation (8%). Patients with inadequate follow-up, cross-pin, or plate fixation were excluded. Medical records were reviewed for indications and complications. Complications were graded with a modification of the Clavien-Dindo classification. Outcomes were judged by a new grading system. RESULTS: A total of 205 forearm fractures treated with IMN in 203 patients were identified. The mean age was 9.7 years (range, 1.7 to 16.2 y) and mean follow-up was 42 weeks. Operative indications were failure of closed treatment in 165 (80%) and open fracture in 40 (20%). Mean time from injury to IMN was 5.9 days (range, 0 to 25 d). Single bone IMN was performed in 40 of 185 both bone fractures (26%); there were 20 single-bone forearm fractures treated with IMN. Open reduction was required in 61/165 (37%) of closed fractures. Asymptomatic delayed union (grade 1 complication) was observed in 9 fractures (4%). More severe complications were noted in 17% (grade 2 to 4 complications). Postoperative compartment syndrome occurred in 3 isolated forearm fractures with a significant younger mean age (6.0 vs. 10 y, P=0.031). Overall, complications were significantly more frequent in children older than 10 years of age (25/101) as compared with younger children (13/104, P=0.031). In particular, delayed union was more common in children over the age of 10 years (9/101 vs. 1/104, OR=9.99, P=0.009). Outcomes were good or excellent in 91% of fractures. There was no statistical association of patient age with a fair or poor outcome. CONCLUSIONS: IMN is an effective technique for pediatric forearm fractures with good to excellent outcomes in 91%. Complications are not infrequent with this technique, with complications of grade 2 to 4 severity in 17%. There was a 2-fold increase in the rate of complications in children over the age of 10 years. Compartment syndrome was more common in younger children. Patients and families should be counseled about the risks preoperatively.

Transarticular spread of Ewing sarcoma mimicking septic arthritis.

Transarticular spread of tumor is rare; it has only been reported in the sacroiliac joint, intervertebral disk spaces, and facet joints. The anatomic and kinetic characteristics of the sacroiliac joint, as well as the changes the joint undergoes during a lifetime, make it particularly vulnerable to transarticular tumor invasion. Although extremely rare, Ewing sarcoma can extend through the sacroiliac joint and be virtually indistinguishable radiologically from septic arthritis. Furthermore, the clinical presentation of a child with Ewing sarcoma can be similar to that of a child with osteomyelitis. Laboratory values are quite nonspecific and are not always helpful in differentiating between the entities. Therefore, the possibility of sacroiliac joint transarticular Ewing sarcoma should be considered in a child presenting with hip pain, despite clinical, radiological and laboratory findings suggesting an infectious process.