Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 193(1): 55-60, 2009 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19542395

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Although ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) are popular and widely used in Europe and Asia, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has not approved a microbubble agent for radiology imaging in the United States. Herein, we discuss the evidence for and the obstacles to using UCAs for contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). CONCLUSION: Despite the obstacles to the use of UCAs for CEUS including regulatory and practice patterns, the evidence indicates that radiologists and patients will be missing an effectual imaging option if we do not encourage the use of CEUS and strongly support the approval of UCAs by the FDA. The evidence outweighs the obstacles: CEUS is cost-effective; can be performed at the bedside; uses no ionizing radiation; has no nephrotoxicity; and, most importantly, can provide accurate diagnostic information comparable to CT and MRI.


Assuntos
Meios de Contraste/efeitos adversos , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Nefropatias/induzido quimicamente , Nefropatias/prevenção & controle , Ultrassonografia/efeitos adversos , Ultrassonografia/métodos , Humanos , Medição de Risco , Ultrassonografia/tendências
4.
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...