Geographic analysis of military health system (MHS) buprenorphine prescribers and patients.

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the prevalence of opioid use disorder (OUD) in the military health system (MHS), geographically map OUD patients and providers, and offer policy recommendations to help increase buprenorphine waiver prescribing. DESIGN: This study was a retrospective review of data from the MHS records. Deidentified records of MHS OUD patients receiving buprenorphine were utilized. Secondary data with nonpersonally identifiable information (PII) were used for pulling records of buprenorphine prescribing providers within the direct care system (MHS providers) and providers from the purchased care system (civilian facilities accepting TRICARE beneficiaries). SETTING: This study reviewed records of individuals within the MHS, in the United States, and its territories. PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS: Patients within the MHS system with a diagnosis of OUD. Providers, within the MHS or purchased care, who had prescribed buprenorphine were selected. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURED: The number of OUD patients in the MHS and providers caring for these OUD patients. In addition, geographical maps illustrating the dispersion of OUD patients, and prescribers were created. RESULTS: The vast majority of MHS OUD patients receive their care from purchased care. Between 2015 and 2018, there has been a shift in the number OUD diagnosed patients by region, and the number of OUD prescribers. CONCLUSION: The MHS population, particularly active duty, is a transient population. As such, it is not a surprise that the population of OUD patients or prescribers varied by region during that time period. Furthermore, results demonstrate that there is a need to increase the number of buprenorphine-waivered prescribers within the MHS. Changes in policy may encourage more providers to obtain the waiver or increase patient load.

Demographic, Behavioral, and Proximal Risk Factors for Gambling Disorder in the US Military.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To estimate the diagnostic prevalence and incidence of gambling disorder among United States service members and to identify associated risk factors, including demographics, history of mental illness or substance misuse, and proximity to legalized gambling vicinities. METHODS: Gambling disorder cases comprised active component Service members who received a pathological or problem gambling diagnosis between October 1, 2005 and September 30, 2015. There were 901 cases (392 incidents) during the study period. Controls were matched on the case military entrance date (N = 43,564). Geospatial distance between gambling venue and military treatment facilities were calculated, then multivariable logistic regression and survival analyses were conducted. RESULTS: The 10-year prevalence of gambling disorder was 6.6 per 100,000. Men were 3.5 times more likely than women to receive a gambling disorder diagnosis. Other risk factors included age over 24, Asian or Black race, formerly married, and enlisted rank. The odds of gambling disorder increased with duration and proximity to gambling venues, ranging from 2.0 to 3.9. Service members with prior substance misuse or mental health conditions were 3.9 times and 6.3 times more likely to receive a disordered gambling diagnosis than those without substance misuse or mental illness history, respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE: The results of this study reveal that proximity to gambling venues and slot machines on bases, as well as a history of substance misuse or mental disorders, are important risk factors for gambling disorder in the US military. Department of Defense screening policies that focus on high-risk populations are appropriate. (Am J Addict 2021;00:00-00).

Rates of prescription orders for United States active duty service members diagnosed with alcohol use disorder.

Background: Alcohol-use disorders (AUD) pose a significant challenge for the United States (US) military. The US Department of Defense has strongly recommended several medications for use in the treatment of patients with diagnosed AUD. This study assessed the prescription of medications for active duty service members (ADSMs) diagnosed with AUD in the US Military Health System (MHS). Methods: Rates of prescription orders were retrospectively examined from 2010 to 2017 among ADSMs with an incident diagnosis of moderate-to-severe AUD. The rate of prescription orders was defined as the proportion of ADSMs with an ICD-9 or ICD-10 diagnosis code of alcohol dependence who received an order for acamprosate, disulfiram, naltrexone, and/or topiramate at a military treatment facility in the year following their incident diagnosis. Results: ADSMs receiving an order for at least one medication in the year following their incident AUD diagnosis increased from 8.8% in 2010 to 16.2% in 2017 (RR = 1.84, 95% CI, 1.76, 1.93). Oral naltrexone was ordered most frequently among this patient population, while injectable naltrexone, a medication option meant to ease and improve adherence, was ordered for a smaller proportion of patients. Conclusions: Most ADSMs who might benefit from prescriptions for AUD are not receiving them as part of their treatment despite strong clinical evidence and Department of Defense policy support for their use among this cohort.