Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Pediatr Surg Int ; 40(1): 159, 2024 Jun 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38900155

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The "Golden Hour" of transportation to a hospital has long been accepted as a central principal of trauma care. However, this has not been studied in pediatric populations. We assessed for non-linearity of the relationship between prehospital time and mortality in pediatric trauma patients, redefining the threshold at which reducing this time led to more favorable outcomes. METHODS: We performed an analysis of the 2017-2018 American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program, including trauma patients age < 18 years. We examined the association between prehospital time and odds of in-hospital mortality using linear, polynomial, and restricted cubic spline (RCS) models, ultimately selecting the non-linear RCS model as the best fit. RESULTS: 60,670 patients were included in the study, of whom 1525 died and 3074 experienced complications. Prolonged prehospital time was associated with lower mortality and fewer complications. Both models demonstrated that mortality risk was lowest at 45-60 min, after which time was no longer associated with reduced probability of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The demonstration of a non-linear relationship between pre-hospital time and patient mortality is a novel finding. We highlight the need to improve prehospital treatment and access to pediatric trauma centers while aiming for hospital transportation within 45 min.


Assuntos
Mortalidade Hospitalar , Ferimentos e Lesões , Humanos , Criança , Feminino , Masculino , Ferimentos e Lesões/mortalidade , Ferimentos e Lesões/terapia , Adolescente , Pré-Escolar , Estudos Retrospectivos , Lactente , Fatores de Tempo , Centros de Traumatologia , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/métodos , Tempo para o Tratamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Melhoria de Qualidade
2.
Am Surg ; : 31348241256081, 2024 May 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38775201

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Congenital heart disease (CHD) is one the most common congenital anomalies, with a prevalence of 8-10 cases per 1000 live births in the United States. Congenital heart disease has been recognized as a risk factor for poor perioperative and postoperative outcomes in non-cardiac surgery. We aimed to determine if documentation of CHD-related diagnosis codes was associated with similar risks for trauma surgery. METHODS: Data were acquired from the 2010-2019 American College of Surgeons' Trauma Quality Programs Participant Use Files. This study included trauma patients of all ages with one or more surgical procedures and at least one documented non-trauma (comorbidity) International Classification of Diseases code. Patients were stratified based on presence of CHD-related comorbidity codes vs any other comorbidity. Outcomes included mortality, hospital length of stay (LOS), discharge disposition, and in-hospital complications. RESULTS: Using 1:1 propensity score matching, we matched 215 cases with CHD-related comorbid diagnoses to non-CHD controls. Compared to patients with other comorbidities, patients with CHD-related comorbidites were less likely to be discharged home to self-care (odds ratio: 0.44, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.25, 078 P = .005) and tended to have prolonged hospital LOS (incidence rate ratio [IRR]: 1.06, 95% CI: 1.001, 1.13, P = .046). CONCLUSIONS: We present the first quantitative multicenter analysis correlating documentation of comorbid CHD-related diagnoses with higher risk of adverse outcomes after trauma surgery. These results support the need to routinely acknowledge and document CHD as comorbidity in trauma admissions that could lead to surgical intervention and for trauma centers to prepare for patients with a possible CHD comorbidity.

3.
J Rural Health ; 39(2): 383-391, 2023 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36076339

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Pediatric farm-related injuries are rare but tend to be severe relative to other types of pediatric injury and may result in worse clinical outcomes. However, the comparison of farm and nonfarm injuries is confounded by different injury mechanisms, patient characteristics, and treating facilities. Therefore, we used propensity score matching to compare outcomes of pediatric farm and nonfarm injuries in the United States. METHODS: Data were obtained from the 2017-2019 Trauma Quality Program database. Farm as compared to nonfarm injury was defined as the location of an injury and served as the independent variable analyzed in this study. The outcome variables analyzed were in-hospital mortality, hospital length of stay (LOS), and admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). RESULTS: We identified 2,040 farm injuries and 201,865 nonfarm injuries meeting inclusion criteria. In this cohort, the mortality rate was 1%, median LOS was 2 days, and 14% of patients were admitted to the ICU. In the propensity-matched analysis (including 2,039 farm cases matched to 2,039 nonfarm controls), farm as compared to nonfarm injuries were associated with 5% longer LOS (95% CI: 1%, 8%; P = .01), but not mortality or ICU admission. CONCLUSIONS: In a propensity-matched analysis, pediatric farm injuries resulted in prolonged hospital stay compared to nonfarm injuries. Identifying patient- and health care system-level factors contributing to prolonged LOS may help optimize the care of children injured on farms.


Assuntos
Hospitalização , Ferimentos e Lesões , Humanos , Criança , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Fazendas , Tempo de Internação , Estudos Retrospectivos , Ferimentos e Lesões/epidemiologia
4.
Am Surg ; 89(11): 4508-4520, 2023 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35977917

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Pediatric trauma outcomes can vary across facilities, yet evidence on the relationship between facility bed size and pediatric trauma outcomes has been mixed. We aimed to identify how facility bed size might modify the impact of patient-level risk factors on mortality in pediatric trauma. We hypothesized that patient-level risk factors would have a stronger association with mortality at smaller trauma centers, and a weaker association with mortality at larger centers. METHODS: We used deidentified data obtained from the 2017-2018 Trauma Quality Programs registry, including patients ages 0-18 years of age who were admitted to the hospital. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Facility bed size was dichotomized as large (>600 beds) vs small/medium (≤600 beds). Sensitivity analyses used 200 and 400 beds as alternative cutoffs. Interaction between facility bed size and patient characteristics was assessed using unadjusted logistic regression, with statistically significant interactions entered in a final, fully adjusted model. RESULTS: The analysis included 171 810 patients (mean age 10 ± 5 years; 65%/35% male/female), including 28% treated in a large hospital and 1.2% who died during the hospitalization. Controlling for trauma center level (or subsetting to pediatric trauma centers only), larger bed size did not reduce mortality risk associated with patient characteristics such as injury mechanism, injury severity, or patient demographics. CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to our hypothesis, greater facility bed size was not associated with reduced mortality risk associated with patient characteristics. Future studies are needed to identify hospital practices or characteristics that can attenuate the excess risk of known patient-level risk factors.


Assuntos
Hospitalização , Ferimentos e Lesões , Humanos , Criança , Masculino , Feminino , Pré-Escolar , Adolescente , Fatores de Risco , Modelos Logísticos , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Hospitais , Centros de Traumatologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Ferimentos e Lesões/terapia , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento
5.
Am Surg ; : 31348221148361, 2022 Dec 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36583224

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: On March 14, 2020, schools across North Carolina (NC) closed in response to Covid-19, forcing completion of the school year at home. Most pediatric trauma occurs at home with a higher prevalence when children are out of school. We queried the state trauma database to assess if the 2020 "shelter in place" was associated with an increase in pediatric trauma statewide. METHODS: The NC trauma database was queried for injuries in children (age < 18 yrs) from 13 March-1 August 2020, and the corresponding months of 2018 and 2019. The number and type of injuries were compared. We also queried the NC death certificate and child welfare databases. Data were analyzed by standard statistical methods using chi-squared or Kruskal-Wallis test. RESULTS: Total pediatric trauma cases were lower during 2020 (71.6 per 100,000) compared to 2018 (92.4 per 100,000) and 2019 (80 per 100,000) (P < .001); however, average injury severity score (ISS) was higher (P = .001). A significant increase in firearm injuries were seen in 2020 (P = .016), with an increase in mortality (P = .08) and ISS (P = .013). The rate of child abuse trauma decreased in 2020 (P = .005) as did the number of child abuse and neglect reports (P < .001). There were also significant decreases in trauma due to sports, burns, falls, and motor vehicle accidents. CONCLUSION: While overall pediatric trauma decreased during the Covid-19 pandemic, there was an alarming increase in penetrating injuries in children. Child abuse trauma and reports decreased, which is concerning for lower identification of abuse.

6.
J Surg Res ; 276: 136-142, 2022 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35339781

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Pediatric trauma patients who lack insurance coverage may have less access to transport other than emergency medical services (EMS) or face financial barriers that prevent utilization of these services. We analyzed the association between health insurance coverage and EMS transport while controlling for injury and patient characteristics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: De-identified Trauma Quality Programs registry data were queried for pediatric trauma patients age <18 y. The primary outcome was arrival by EMS (excluding interfacility transfer) versus private transport or walk-in, and the primary exposure was insurance coverage (any versus none). After exact matching on injury and facility characteristics, propensity matching was used to balance demographic covariates and comorbidities between insured and uninsured patients. RESULTS: Of the 130,246 patients analyzed, 9501 (7%) did not have insurance coverage. After matching 9494 uninsured cases to 9494 insured controls, fixed-effects logistic regression found that uninsured patients had 18% greater odds of using EMS transport, compared to insured patients (odds ratio: 1.18; 95% confidence interval: 1.11, 1.26; P < 0.001). Results were similar when comparing uninsured patients to privately insured or publicly insured patients only. CONCLUSIONS: Uninsured pediatric trauma patients have a higher likelihood of using EMS transport compared to insured patients with similar demographic and clinical characteristics, including the exact same score of injury severity. Lack of access to private transport may drive higher EMS utilization in uninsured patients with minor injuries and contribute to higher costs of pediatric trauma care borne by institutions and families.


Assuntos
Serviços Médicos de Emergência , Pessoas sem Cobertura de Seguro de Saúde , Criança , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Cobertura do Seguro , Seguro Saúde , Razão de Chances , Sistema de Registros , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...