Staging of colon and rectal cancer: from endoscopy to molecular markers.

The primary management of colorectal cancer begins with preoperative diagnosis and the ability to stage the extent of the tumor burden clinically. Endoscopic approaches have been pivotal in this management strategy, and have given rise to endoscopic techniques allowing for primary resection and treatment of metastases. This advance has allowed for the continued development of pathologic staging as used in the tumor node metastasis (TNM) system. The next major milestone in the staging of large bowel cancer will be to blend current anatomic staging strategies with specific molecular markers that will refine subsets appropriate for targeted therapy.

Optimal teaching environment for laparoscopic ventral herniorrhaphy.

The introduction of laparoscopic techniques after residency training has created a new paradigm dependent on laparoscopic workshops. This study tested the benefit of an animate course and evaluated the role of proctoring in learning to perform laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR). Surgeons who had taken a 1-day LVHR course (n = 59) were polled to determine previous experience with laparoscopic procedures and experience with LVHR after the course. Forty-eight (81%) surgeons completing the course responded. Thirty-two (67%) surgeons had performed 179 LVHRS (mean 5.6) since the course. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups performing and not performing LVHR regarding academic/private practice (P=0.8) or opportunities to perform a ventral herniorrhaphy (P = 0.6). Fifteen (31%) surgeons were precepted in their hospital operating room by the lead author. Thirteen (87%) of precepted surgeons had performed a LVHR compared with 19 (58%) of the 33 surgeons taking the course without a precepted intervention (P = 0.05). Surgeons with experience performing laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair, Nissen fundoplication, and common bile duct exploration were more likely to perform LVHR (P=0.0001). Surgeons performing only laparoscopic cholecystectomy tended to be less likely to perform LVHR, nearing statistical significance (P=0.08). Surgeons with prior advanced laparoscopic surgery experience are thus more likely to perform LVHR after participating in a 1-day course. Surgeons precepted in their hospital operating room were also more likely to perform LVHR. Participation in an animate laboratory and a precepted experience can impact the future performance of advanced laparoscopic surgery.

Endoluminal resection of gastric intestinal stromal tumors (GIST).

Endoluminal surgery, the combination of flexible endoscopy and percutaneous transgastric laparoscopy, has expanded the role of minimally invasive surgery in treating foregut diseases. This imaginative technique blends the skills of endoscopist and laparoscopist. The stomach is well-suited for this technique as it is an expandable, large volume organ readily accessible to a flexible endoscope, and the relative ease of placing endoscopically or laparoscopically-guided percutaneous, transgastric ports provides access for laparoscopic instrumentation. The resection of gastric stromal tumors provides one of the few opportunities to integrate flexible endoscopy and laparoscopy. Proper training in the appropriate indications to utilize endoluminal techniques and familiarity with the multiple modifications from the original intragastric techniques described nearly a decade ago will allow surgeons to approach small, predominately endoluminal gastric stromal tumors with low malignant potential located in the cardia, along the posterior gastric wall, near the gastroesophageal junction or proximal to the pylorus.

Initial results with an electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer.

BACKGROUND: An electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer (EBVS; Ligasure, Valleylab, Boulder, CO, USA) was developed as an alternative to suture ligatures, hemoclips, staplers, and ultrasonic coagulators for ligating vessels and tissue bundles. The EBVS seals vessels up to 7 mm in diameter by denaturing collagen and elastin within the vessel wall and surrounding connective tissue. This study is the first to determine the clinical efficacy and safety of this instrument and delineate its potential timesavings in both experimental (animal) and clinical scenarios. METHODS: A prospective review of the author's clinical experience with the EBVS in laparoscopic and open operations from October 1998 to March 2000 was performed. In addition, five Yorkshire domestic pigs underwent 150-cm small intestine resections (n = 10) using the EBVS (n = 5) and suture ligatures (n = 5). Measurements included time to complete intestinal resection, the number of applications per minute for each method, and the presence of postapplication bleeding. Statistical analysis was performed using Student's t-test. RESULTS: The EBVS was used in 98 cases (46 laparoscopic and 52 open) with a mean of 43 applications (range, 10-150 applications) per case. The operations included 53 colon and/or small bowel resections (54.1%), 24 fundoplications (24.5%), 12 gastric resections (12.2%), 3 splenectomies, 2 pancreatectomies, 1 adrenalectomy, 1 bilateral salpingo-oopherectomy, 1 pancreatic cyst-jejunostomy, and 1 vagotomy with gastrojejunostomy. In all these cases, the EBVS was intended to be the only means of vessel ligation. An alternative ligation technique was required for bleeding in only 13 (0.3%) of more than 4,200 applications of the EBVS. No postoperative hemorrhagic complications occurred. There was an estimated mean reduction in operative time of 39 min per open procedure, and a mean prolongation in operative time of 8 min per laparoscopic procedure when the EBVS was used in lieu of suture ligatures, hemoclips, staplers, or ultrasonic coagulators. In the animal model, the mean time for completion of the intestinal resection was 251.9 s for the EBVS and 702.0 s for ligatures (p < 0.001). The mean number of applications per minute was 7.6 for the EBVS and 1.8 for ligatures (p < 0.001). No postapplication bleeding was seen. CONCLUSIONS: Initial clinical results from the use of EBVS in laparoscopic and open procedures demonstrate it to be safe and effective, reducing operative time in open procedures. Suture ligatures, ties, hemoclips, and other ligating techniques were used rarely (0.3%) after an application of the EBVS. In an experimental animal model, the EBVS was significantly faster and more efficient (more applications per minute) than ligatures for intestinal resection.

Optimal teaching environment for laparoscopic splenectomy.

BACKGROUND: Traditional surgical teaching depends on graduated acquisition of skill learned in residency. The introduction of minimal access techniques after residency training has created a new paradigm dependent on animate course experiences and limited preceptor training. The outcome of performance of a new skill "learned" in these settings has not been assessed. The purpose of this study was to test the benefit of an animate course compared with a precepted operating room experience in learning to perform a laparoscopic splenectomy. METHODS: All attending surgeons who had taken a 1-day course to learn laparoscopic splenectomy (n = 37) and those who had undergone an intraoperative preceptorship (in their hospital) by the lead author (n = 15) were polled to ascertain their previous experience with laparoscopy and with laparoscopic splenectomy since the intervention. The course included lectures, operative videos, and an animal lab. Statistical differences were measured using a t test. RESULTS: Thirty-two of the 37 (86.5%) taking the course and all 15 of the precepted surgeons responded. There was no difference between the groups regarding prior laparoscopic experience (P = 0.73), laparoscopic training during residency (P = 0.74), academic or private practice (P = 0.48), or follow-up since the intervention (P = 0.36). The participants graded the courses (1 to 5, 5 = excellent) at an average of 4.72. Fourteen of 15 precepted surgeons have performed laparoscopic splenectomy as compared with 2 of 32 taking courses (nonprecepted surgeons; P <0.0001). The number of laparoscopic splenectomies performed totaled 112 for precepted surgeons and 4 for nonprecepted surgeons (P = 0.0003). The nonprecepted surgeons performed significantly more open splenectomies than laparoscopic (95 versus 13 respectively, P = 0.02). Reasons quoted not to proceed with laparoscopic splenectomy included waiting for the perfect patient, concern of hilar management, and splenic size. CONCLUSION: Surgeons precepted in their own operating room performed a laparoscopic splenectomy more readily than those gaining experience from a course only (93% versus 6%, respectively) despite no difference in their preintervention experience and having the opportunity to do so. The expectation of the eventual performance of advanced laparoscopic techniques depends on a precepted experience.