Advanced myopia, prevalence and incidence analysis.

PURPOSE: Various high-percentage high-incidence medical conditions, acute or chronic, start at a particular age of onset t1 (years), accumulate or progress rapidly, with a system time constant t0 (years), typically from 1 week to 5 years, and then level off at a plateau level [Formula: see text], ultimately affecting 10-95% of the population. This report investigates the prevalence and incidence functions for myopia and high myopia as a function of age. METHODS: Fundamental prevalence versus time and incidence versus time results allow continuous prediction of myopia and high myopia population fractions as a function of age. This is a retrospective study. Nine reports are calculated with N = 444,600 subjects. There were no interventions other than usual regular eye examinations and subsequent indicated refraction change. RESULTS: The main result is continuous prediction of myopia prevalence-time data along with incidence rate data (%/year), age of onset (years), system plateau level, and system time constant (years). These parameters apply to progressive myopia and high myopia (R < -6 D), useful over several decades. CONCLUSIONS: The primary finding of this research is that the prevalence ratio of high myopes (R < -6.0 D) to common myopes is expected to increase from 15% entering college to 45% or more after college and graduate school. These statistics are particularly relevant to the many years of study required by M.D., Ph.D., and M.D./Ph.D. programs.

Electric blanket use and breast cancer on Long Island.

BACKGROUND: Exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMF) has been hypothesized to increase the risk of breast cancer by inhibiting the normal nocturnal rise in melatonin levels. METHODS: Information on electric blanket use was collected in a large, 2-stage, population-based, case-control investigation of breast cancer, The Long Island Breast Cancer Study Project (LIBCSP) and the EMF and Breast Cancer on Long Island Study (EBCLIS). The LIBCSP used a comprehensive questionnaire, including questions about electric appliance use, with responses available on 1354 cases diagnosed between mid-1996 and mid-1997 and 1426 control subjects. EBCLIS enrolled 576 cases and 585 control subjects who had participated in the LIBCSP and who had lived in their current homes for at least 15 years. EBCLIS participants were interviewed to obtain additional information on EMF exposures, including detailed questions on electric blanket use. RESULTS: Analyses of both the EBCLIS and the LIBCSP groups showed no association with breast cancer for ever-use of electric blankets, current or former use, use directly on the body, or use throughout the night in either pre- or postmenopausal women (range of adjusted odds ratios for ever vs. never use: 0.9-1.2). Furthermore, there was no trend in risk with increased duration of use, frequency of use, or other indicators of more intense exposure to EMF. Electric blanket use was not associated with hormone receptor status of the tumor. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this large investigation are consistent with those of most previous studies, and do not support the hypothesis that electric blanket use is associated with increased breast cancer risk.