Effects of laparoscopic vs laparotomy treatment of E. coli peritonitis on hemodynamic responses in a porcine model.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic surgery is being used now for increasingly diverse clinical applications, including diagnosis and treatment of appendicitis and bacterial peritonitis. However, some concerns and controversies exist regarding the effectiveness of laparoscopic irrigation of the abdominal cavity compared with that achieved during laparotomy. Of no less importance is concern that establishing a CO(2) pneumoperitoneum in patients with cardiopulmonary insufficiency or endotoxemic shock may compromise hemodynamic function. The objective of this randomized, controlled study was to determine the effects of laparoscopic versus laparotomy intervention on hemodynamic and outcome measurements using a porcine model of Escherichia coli peritonitis. METHODS: For this study, 24 specific pathogen-free Hanford pigs underwent surgical placement of carotid, Swan-Ganz, and peritoneal catheters. After a 24-h recovery period, one subset of pigs (n = 12) received a bolus infusion of 9 x 10(8) CFU/kg E. coli intraperitoneally (septic) and intravenous fluid resuscitation. The remaining 12 pigs were not challenged with E. coli (control). Twenty-four hours later, all 24 pigs underwent either laparoscopic or open peritoneal irrigation with saline, then were reevaluated 48 h after surgical intervention. Standard cardiopulmonary, hematologic, and bacteriologic assessments were obtained both perioperatively and 48 h after surgical intervention. RESULTS: Pigs given E. coli exhibited significantly elevated heart rates and core temperatures and decreased O(2) saturation during the initial 6 h. Within 24 h, these pigs exhibited respiratory alkalosis, altered blood leukocyte profiles, and E. coli-infected peritoneal fluid. Random blood samples from the septic pigs tested negative for E. coli. Mean pulmonary artery and capillary wedge pressures were lower (p < 0.05) in septic than in control pigs before and after surgical intervention. Septic pigs that underwent laparoscopy had significantly lower (p < 0.05) arterial pH and higher arterial pCO(2) levels than septic pigs after laparotomy. Other cardiopulmonary responses were similar irrespective of the surgical modality used. One of six septic pigs from each surgical group still had E. coli growth in its peritoneal fluid 48 h after surgical intervention. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic intervention demonstrated effectiveness equal to that of laparotomy for treating acute E. coli peritonitis in pigs without septic shock.

Entrapment and obstruction of the esophagus from thoracic spine hyperextension-dislocation injury.

We have reported a unique case of esophageal entrapment and obstruction from a thoracic spine hyperextension-dislocation injury after a motor vehicle crash. Because the risk for esophageal injury is not typically associated with thoracic spine injury, a heightened sensitivity for developing symptoms and signs is at least necessary. As with any injury to the gastrointestinal tract, optimal therapy requires resuscitation and prompt operative intervention.

Cardiopulmonary effects of the laparoscopic pneumoperitoneum in a porcine model of adult respiratory distress syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Increasingly, laparoscopy is being used in critically ill patients in whom there is a question of intra-abdominal sepsis. We examine the cardiopulmonary effects of laparoscopy in a porcine model of adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). METHODS: Domestic pigs (n = 12) underwent saline lung lavage and subsequent surgical abdominal exploration using either laparoscopy or conventional laparotomy. Hemodynamic and respiratory measurements were obtained. RESULTS: After pulmonary lavage, the two groups developed similarly diminished arterial pO2 (P <0.001), a worsened pulmonary shunt (P <0.001), and an increased alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient (P <0.001). The pulmonary compliance was significantly decreased in the animals undergoing laparoscopy (versus laparotomy, P <0.05). The mean pulmonary arterial pressure did not differ between the groups. The laparoscopic group had a higher pCO2 (not significant) and was more acidotic (P <0.05) than the laparotomy group. The laparoscopic animals had an increased heart rate (P <0.05), cardiac index (P <0.01), and oxygen delivery (P <0.005) as compared with the laparotomy group. CONCLUSIONS: During laparoscopy, animals with ARDS demonstrate further compromise in pulmonary physiologic parameters but overall cardio-respiratory function is preserved.

Hemodynamic effects of the laparoscopic pneumoperitoneum during sepsis in a porcine endotoxic shock model.

OBJECTIVE: The authors compared the hemodynamic effects of laparoscopic intervention with conventional laparotomy in an endotoxic shock model in the pig. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Laparoscopic techniques are being applied more frequently to severely ill patients to evaluate potential abdominal sources of sepsis. Although hemodynamic effects of laparoscopy are minimal in healthy patients, recent studies have shown more significant changes in patients with chronic cardiopulmonary disease. It is unclear whether these effects are applicable to acutely septic patients. METHODS: Twelve domestic pigs received intravenous lipopolysaccharide (LPS) injection and underwent surgical abdominal exploration using either laparoscopy or conventional laparotomy. For baseline comparison, four pigs underwent exploratory laparoscopy without intravenous LPS injection. Hemodynamic measurements and blood gas analyses were obtained using Swan-Ganz and arterial catheters. RESULTS: After LPS exposure, animals undergoing laparoscopic evaluation were significantly more hypercarbic (p < 0.01) and acidotic (p < 0.01) than those undergoing conventional laparotomy. Their mean pulmonary arterial pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance were greater as well (not significant). The cardiac index (p < 0.05) and stroke volume (p < 0.05) were decreased in the laparoscopic group. Their oxygen delivery was decreased and oxygen consumption increased, although these were not significantly different from those of the laparotomy group. The degree of acidosis was highly correlated with the cardiac index (correlation coefficient, r = 0.82). CONCLUSIONS: Animals exposed to LPS tolerate laparoscopy but with significant hemodynamic compromise. Much of this effect seems to be mediated by a cardiodepressive effect of acidosis. This study suggests that laparoscopic intervention, when used in septic patients, should be used with caution.