Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Urol Int ; 100(2): 216-221, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29069660

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the TiLOOP® male sling (pfm medical, Cologne, Germany) used in the treatment for male stress urinary incontinence (SUI). MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated a total of 34 patients with a TiLOOP® male sling. Perioperative complication rates were assessed and validated questionnaires were prospectively evaluated to assess quality of life and satisfaction rate. Outcome and complication rates were analysed by using descriptive statistics. Correlation of continence outcome and risk factors was performed with the chi-square test. A p value below 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The majority of patients (70.6%) were diagnosed with mild or moderate male SUI. During surgery, one instance (2.9%) of intraoperative urethral injury was observed. There were no immediate postoperative complications. The mean follow-up time was 44.6 months. An improvement of male SUI was reported by 61.9% of the patients and 38.1% reported no change according the Patient Global Impression of Improvement. The mean perineal pain score was 0.5 according to the international index of pain. CONCLUSIONS: The TiLOOP® is a safe treatment option for male SUI in our cohort with a low complication rate. However, the functional outcome of the TiLOOP® was inferior when compared to the outcome of the AdVance® male sling.


Assuntos
Slings Suburetrais , Incontinência Urinária por Estresse/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos Masculinos/instrumentação , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Satisfação do Paciente , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Desenho de Prótese , Qualidade de Vida , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Inquéritos e Questionários , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Incontinência Urinária por Estresse/diagnóstico , Incontinência Urinária por Estresse/fisiopatologia , Urodinâmica , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos Masculinos/efeitos adversos
2.
Urology ; 103: 179-184, 2017 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28093308

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of the antibiotic coating InhibiZone on the infection and explantation rates of the AMS 800 in comparison to the AMS 800 without InhibiZone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively identified 305 patients with an AMS 800 in a multicenter cohort study. Patients were subsequently divided into InhibiZone and without InhibiZone-coated groups. Infection and explantation rates were analyzed by univariate and consecutively by multivariate logistic regression adjusted to variable risk factors. The infection-free interval was estimated by Kaplan-Meier plot and compared by the log-rank test. A P value below .05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: We identified 47 patients with InhibiZone and 258 without InhibiZone coating. In univariate analysis, we could not identify a significant difference in infection (P = .932) or explantation (P = .715) rates between the groups. In multivariate analysis, impaired wound healing (P = .008) and urethral erosion (P < .001) were independent predictors for infection. The InhibiZone coating neither demonstrated significant influence on the infection rate (P = .534) nor on the explantation rate (P = .214). There was no significant difference in estimated infection-free survival between the groups (P = .265). CONCLUSION: The antibiotic coating of the AMS 800 had no significant impact on infection or explantation rates in our cohort.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Efeitos Adversos de Longa Duração , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese , Esfíncter Urinário Artificial/efeitos adversos , Infecções Urinárias , Idoso , Materiais Revestidos Biocompatíveis/farmacologia , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Efeitos Adversos de Longa Duração/diagnóstico , Efeitos Adversos de Longa Duração/prevenção & controle , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Desenho de Prótese , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/diagnóstico , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/prevenção & controle , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Incontinência Urinária/terapia , Infecções Urinárias/diagnóstico , Infecções Urinárias/etiologia , Infecções Urinárias/prevenção & controle
3.
Urol Int ; 99(1): 14-21, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27598774

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: We analysed the impact of predefined risk factors: age, diabetes, history of pelvic irradiation, prior surgery for stress urinary incontinence (SUI), prior urethral stricture, additional procedure during SUI surgery, duration of incontinence, ASA-classification and cause for incontinence on failure and complications in male SUI surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively identified 506 patients with an artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) and 513 patients with a male sling (MS) in a multicenter cohort study. Complication rates were correlated to the risk factors in univariate analysis. Subsequently, a multivariate logistic regression adjusted to the risk factors was performed. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: A history of pelvic irradiation was an independent risk factor for explantation in AUS (p < 0.001) and MS (p = 0.018). Moreover, prior urethral stricture (p = 0.036) and higher ASA-classification (p = 0.039) were positively correlated with explantation in univariate analysis for AUS. Urethral erosion was correlated with prior urethral stricture (p < 0.001) and a history of pelvic irradiation (p < 0.001) in AUS. Furthermore, infection was correlated with additional procedures during SUI surgery in univariate analysis (p = 0.037) in MS. CONCLUSIONS: We first identified the correlation of higher ASA-classification and explantation in AUS. Nevertheless, only a few novel risk factors had a significant influence on the failure of MS or AUS.


Assuntos
Falha de Prótese , Slings Suburetrais/efeitos adversos , Incontinência Urinária por Estresse/cirurgia , Esfíncter Urinário Artificial/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos Masculinos/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Razão de Chances , Desenho de Prótese , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Falha de Tratamento , Incontinência Urinária por Estresse/diagnóstico , Incontinência Urinária por Estresse/fisiopatologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos Masculinos/instrumentação
4.
Urol Int ; 97(2): 205-11, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27310718

RESUMO

UNLABELLED: Background/Aims/Objectives: To analyze perioperative complication and short-term explantation rates after perineal or penoscrotal single-cuff and double-cuff artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation in a large middle European multi-institutional patient cohort. METHODS: 467 male patients with stress urinary incontinence underwent implantation of a perineal single-cuff (n = 152), penoscrotal single-cuff (n = 99), or perineal double-cuff (n = 216) AUS between 2010 and 2012. Postoperative complications and 6-month explantation rates were assessed. For statistical analysis, Fisher's exact test and Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test, and a multiple logistic regression model were used (p < 0.05). RESULTS: Compared to perineal single-cuff AUS, penoscrotal single-cuff implantation led to significantly increased short-term explantation rates (8.6% (perineal) vs. 19.2% (penoscrotal), p = 0.019). The postoperative infection rate was significantly higher after double-cuff compared to single-cuff implantation (6.0% (single-cuff) vs. 13.9% (double-cuff), p = 0.019). The short-term explantation rate after primary double-cuff placement was 6.5% (p = 0.543 vs. perineal single-cuff). In multivariate analysis, the penoscrotal approach (p = 0.004), intraoperative complications (p = 0.005), postoperative bleeding (p = 0.011), and perioperative infection (p < 0.001) were independent risk factors for short-term explantation. CONCLUSIONS: Providing data from a large contemporary multi-institutional patient cohort from high-volume and low-volume institutions, our results reflect the current standard of care in middle Europe. We indicate that the penoscrotal approach is an independent risk factor for increased short-term explantation rates.


Assuntos
Remoção de Dispositivo/estatística & dados numéricos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Esfíncter Urinário Artificial/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Humanos , Masculino , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Implantação de Prótese/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo
5.
World J Urol ; 34(10): 1457-63, 2016 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26914816

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To analyze efficacy and safety for the ZSI375 artificial urinary sphincter in a multicenter case series. METHODS: Thirteen male patients with stress urinary incontinence underwent implantation of a ZSI375 artificial urinary sphincter device between 2010 and 2012 in three international continence reference centers. Perioperative characteristics and postoperative complications were analyzed using the Clavien-Dindo scale. Re-hospitalization and explantation rates, and functional outcome were assessed. Inner-group and between-group differences were analyzed using Wilcoxon, Mann-Whitney U, and Fisher's exact test whenever indicated. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to assess device survival. A p value below 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: There were no intraoperative complications. Median follow-up was 13.5 months. In this period, four device defects (30.8 %) could be observed, being the main cause for device explantation, followed by device infection (15.4 %), non-resolvable pain (7.7 %), and urethral erosion (7.7 %). There were no Clavien IV or Clavien V complications. Overall explantation rate was 61.5 %. Mean time-to-explantation was 279 ± 308 days. There was no significant influence of previous irradiation and previous invasive incontinence therapy (p = 0.587 and p = 0.685, respectively). Mean daily pad usage decreased from 5.8 ± 1.5 to 2.4 ± 2.1 (p = 0.066). One patient (7.7 %) did not use any pads. Social continence (0-1 pads) was achieved in 15.4 % of the patients. CONCLUSION: This is the most current study that is investigating the outcome after ZSI375 implantation in a multicenter case series. Based on our results, explantation rates after ZSI375 implantation are high and efficacy rates seem lower than previously described. Addressing this high failure rate, the system has undergone a two-step modification in the meantime.


Assuntos
Implantação de Prótese/métodos , Uretra/cirurgia , Incontinência Urinária por Estresse/cirurgia , Esfíncter Urinário Artificial , Micção/fisiologia , Idoso , Humanos , Masculino , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Desenho de Prótese , Resultado do Tratamento , Incontinência Urinária por Estresse/fisiopatologia
6.
Urol Int ; 68(4): 261-4, 2002.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12053029

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: In this pathomorphological study, location, distribution, and degree of arteriosclerotic stenoses in penile arteries from unselected cadavers are investigated. The findings are discussed in the context of penile revascularization and may explain the poor results of this form of surgery in older patients with general arteriosclerosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 120 penile specimens from 120 cadavers were examined histologically after van Gieson staining. Transverse sections were performed at the level of the pubic bone, in the middle of the penis, and at the sulcus coronarius. At these levels the dorsal and deep penile arteries were examined. RESULTS: We found arteriosclerotic stenoses of the penile arteries in 65% of the specimens. Of these stenotic lesions, 20.4% were situated proximally, 37.1% centrally, and 42.5% distally. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with arteriosclerotic stenoses of the penile arteries, microsurgical penile revascularization to the proximal part of the dorsal arteries at the base of the penis seems to be without any relevant long-lasting hemodynamic effect, because the blood flow will be impeded by the peripheral stenoses. This can explain the poor results of revascularization in this group of patients.


Assuntos
Arteriosclerose/patologia , Pênis/irrigação sanguínea , Pênis/patologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Artérias/patologia , Cadáver , Disfunção Erétil/tratamento farmacológico , Disfunção Erétil/patologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...