Transient elastography improves detection of liver cirrhosis compared to routine screening tests.

AIM: To investigate the diagnostic significance of transient elastography (TE) in a daily routine clinical setting in comparison to clinical signs, laboratory parameters and ultrasound. METHODS: TE, ultrasound, laboratory parameters and cutaneous liver signs were assessed in 291 consecutive patients with chronic liver disease of various aetiologies who underwent liver biopsy in daily routine. RESULTS: Sensitivity of TE for the detection of liver cirrhosis was 90.4%, compared to 80.1% for ultrasound, 58.0% for platelet count and 45.1% for cutaneous liver signs (P < 0.0001 for comparisons with histology). AUROC for TE was 0.760 (95%CI: 0.694-0.825). Combination of TE with ultrasound increased sensitivity to 96.1% and AUROC to 0.825 (95%CI: 0.768-0.882). TE correlated with laboratory parameters of cirrhosis progression like albumin (r = -0.43), prothrombin time (r = -0.44), and bilirubin (r = 0.34; P < 0.001 for each). Particularly, in patients with Child Pugh score A or normal platelet count TE improved sensitivity for the detection of liver cirrhosis compared to ultrasound by 14.1% (P < 0.04) and 16.3% (P < 0.02), respectively. CONCLUSION: Transient elastography is superior to routine diagnostic tests allowing detection of liver cirrhosis in additional 10%-16% of patients with chronic liver disease that would have been missed by clinical examinations.

EUS accurately predicts the need for therapeutic ERCP in patients with a low probability of biliary obstruction.

BACKGROUND: Because of its inherent risks, ERCP should only be performed for purposes of treatment. EUS and MRCP have emerged as diagnostic alternatives before therapeutic ERCP. OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to test the accuracy of EUS in predicting the need for therapeutic ERCP in low-risk patients. DESIGN: Prospective, unblinded, single-center study. SETTING: Academic center of the University of Witten/Herdecke. PATIENTS: Fifty patients with clinical, laboratory, or transabdominal US findings suggestive of biliary obstruction were included. INTERVENTIONS: After clinical assessment and US, all patients underwent EUS. If EUS was conclusive, either ERCP with sphincterotomy (EST) was performed or the patients were followed up for 1 year. If EUS was inconclusive, MRCP was performed, followed by ERCP or a 1-year follow-up. After each diagnostic step, the examiner decided whether any biliary conditon was present and whether therapeutic ERCP was necessary. The decicions were compared with the results of ERCP with EST or the outcome after the 1-year follow-up. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Accuracy of EUS in predicting the need for therapeutic ERCP. RESULTS: Nine patients had ERCP with EST. The final assessment classified 2 of these interventions as having been unnecessary. EUS was conclusive in 49 cases. After EUS, the accuracy of the decision on the presence of a biliary condition increased from 82% to 96% and on the need for therapeutic ERCP from 86% to 96%. LIMITATION: Single-center experience. CONCLUSION: EUS accurately predicts the need for therapeutic ERCP in patients at low risk for biliary obstruction.

EUS elastography of the pancreas: feasibility and pattern description of the normal pancreas, chronic pancreatitis, and focal pancreatic lesions.

BACKGROUND: Initial clinical applications have shown that US elastography might be able to distinguish tissues because of their specific consistency. OBJECTIVE: (1) To investigate the feasibility of EUS elastography of the pancreas and (2) to describe elastographic patterns of the normal pancreas and the pancreas affected by inflammatory or focal disease. DESIGN: Prospective single-center study. SETTING: Academic center of the University of Witten/Herdecke. PATIENTS: Twenty patients with normal pancreas, 20 patients with chronic pancreatitis, and 33 patients with focal pancreatic lesion, histologically later proven in 32 of these 33 cases. INTERVENTIONS: Commercially available US equipment was used. The elasticity of tissue was reconstructed in real time within a sample area and was translated into a color scale imaging relative tissue elasticity within this area. Representative loops of at least 20 seconds were recorded regarding each region of interest. RESULTS: Adequate elastographic recordings could be obtained in all 73 patients. Patients with hypoechoic and intermediately echogenic normal pancreas revealed a relatively homogeneous elastographic pattern. Thirty-one focal lesions, including 30 neoplasms and most of the chronically inflamed pancreata had a honeycomb pattern dominated by hard strands. This pattern showed analogies to the histologic structure of 10 resected tumors. Other patients with chronic pancreatitis and those with hyperechoic healthy pancreas had miscellaneous elastographic appearances. CONCLUSIONS: EUS elastography of the pancreas is feasible and produces plausible results. The examination of homogeneous tissue is impaired by the relative scale used. Chronic pancreatitis and hard tumors cannot be distinguished by elastography, probably because of their similar fibrous structure.

[Menthol in the adjuvant treatment of gallbladder stones fragmented by ESWL as an option for reducing doses of urso- and chenodeoxycholic acid]. / Mentholsubstitution als Option zur Dosisreduktion von Urso- und Chenodeoxycholsäure in der adjuvanten Therapie nach ESWL von Gallenblasensteinen.

BACKGROUND: Assessments of the litholytic activity of terpenes in the conservative treatment of gallstone disease vary. Achievement of a stone-free state through dissolution of residual fragments after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is a suitable model for investigating the litholytic activity of menthol. PATIENTS AND METHODS: After ESWL in patients with symptomatic gallbladder stones, the litholytic efficacy of the standard therapy of 125 mg urso-/chenodeoxycholic acid (UDC/CDC) per 25 kg body weight (UDC + CDC) was compared with that of 62.5 mg UDC/CDC plus 125 mg menthol (M) per 25 kg body weight (M + UDC + CDC). 70 patients were treated with M + UDC + CDC (n = 36) or UDC + CDC (n = 34) in a double-blind design. RESULTS: 19 of 34 patients (55.9%) in the UDC + CDC group became stonefree in an average period of 5.9 months, compared with 17 out of 36 patients (47.2%) in the M + UDC + CDC group in 8.8 months. Although the patients on UDC + CDC became stone-free significantly more quickly (p = max [p1,p2] = 0.4717), there was no relevant statistical difference in the total number of stone-free patients between the two treatment groups. After subtraction of the patients who terminated the study prematurely, significantly larger numbers of stone-free patients under the standard therapy were found at 9 and 12 months (16 : 9 and 19 : 12, respectively), while at the other time points no significant difference was found. Before ESWL, seven of 25 patients in the menthol group had two or more stones, while in the group treated with the standard therapy this was only the case in two patients. Five patients had mild calcification on admission to the study, four of whom received M + UDC + CDC. CONCLUSION: Overall, patients become stone-free more quickly on the standard UDC + CDC therapy. However, after subtraction of the patients who discontinued the study prematurely it can be seen that this results from significantly higher numbers of stone-free patients at 9 and 12 months, so that over the entire observation period-and in consideration of the less favorable stone parameters in the menthol group-there is no substantial statistically relevant difference in the efficacy of the two treatments.

Frequency of bacteremia after linear EUS of the upper GI tract with and without FNA.

BACKGROUND: Few data are available concerning the frequency of bacteremia after diagnostic EUS or EUS-guided FNA. This study was undertaken to provide these data and to determine whether present guidelines for prophylactic administration of antibiotics to prevent endocarditis during upper endoscopy are applicable to EUS and EUS-guided FNA. METHODS: A total of 100 patients who were to undergo diagnostic EUS of the upper-GI tract and 50 who were to have upper-GI EUS-guided FNA were enrolled in this prospective study. Blood cultures were obtained before and within 5 minutes after the conclusion of the procedure. In case of bacterial growth, patients were observed for at least 3 days for signs of infection. RESULTS: After diagnostic EUS, significant bacteremia was found in two patients with esophageal carcinoma (2%: 95% CI[0%, 4.8%]) and after EUS-guided FNA in two patients (4%: 95% CI[0%, 9.6%]). The difference was not statistically significant. None of these patients developed clinical signs of infection. Risk factors predisposing to bacteremia could not be identified. CONCLUSION: The frequency of bacteremia after EUS, with and without FNA, is within the range of that for diagnostic upper endoscopy. Therefore, the same recommendations for prophylactic administration of antibiotics to prevent endocarditis may be applied in patients undergoing EUS and EUS-guided FNA. The role of esophageal cancer as a predisposing factor to EUS-associated infection remains uncertain.